Cargando…

Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies

The major predecessor to Ringen’s and my own efforts to measure democratic quality in terms of the purpose of democracy is Robert Dahl’s seminal book Polyarchy (1971). Measuring the quality of democracy requires two prior judgments: (1) making sure that, in terms of institutional characteristics, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lijphart, Arend
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3003825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21258634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9389-0
_version_ 1782193912862998528
author Lijphart, Arend
author_facet Lijphart, Arend
author_sort Lijphart, Arend
collection PubMed
description The major predecessor to Ringen’s and my own efforts to measure democratic quality in terms of the purpose of democracy is Robert Dahl’s seminal book Polyarchy (1971). Measuring the quality of democracy requires two prior judgments: (1) making sure that, in terms of institutional characteristics, a country is sufficiently democratic, and that, as a minimum, it has universal suffrage, and (2) that its democracy has been uninterrupted for a minimum number of years. To an important extent, higher democratic quality can be attributed to institutional characteristics of consensus democracy, especially proportional representation.
format Text
id pubmed-3003825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30038252011-01-19 Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies Lijphart, Arend Society Symposium: Measuring Democracy The major predecessor to Ringen’s and my own efforts to measure democratic quality in terms of the purpose of democracy is Robert Dahl’s seminal book Polyarchy (1971). Measuring the quality of democracy requires two prior judgments: (1) making sure that, in terms of institutional characteristics, a country is sufficiently democratic, and that, as a minimum, it has universal suffrage, and (2) that its democracy has been uninterrupted for a minimum number of years. To an important extent, higher democratic quality can be attributed to institutional characteristics of consensus democracy, especially proportional representation. Springer-Verlag 2010-11-24 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3003825/ /pubmed/21258634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9389-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Symposium: Measuring Democracy
Lijphart, Arend
Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies
title Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies
title_full Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies
title_fullStr Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies
title_full_unstemmed Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies
title_short Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies
title_sort democratic quality in stable democracies
topic Symposium: Measuring Democracy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3003825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21258634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9389-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lijphartarend democraticqualityinstabledemocracies