Cargando…
Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies
The major predecessor to Ringen’s and my own efforts to measure democratic quality in terms of the purpose of democracy is Robert Dahl’s seminal book Polyarchy (1971). Measuring the quality of democracy requires two prior judgments: (1) making sure that, in terms of institutional characteristics, a...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3003825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21258634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9389-0 |
_version_ | 1782193912862998528 |
---|---|
author | Lijphart, Arend |
author_facet | Lijphart, Arend |
author_sort | Lijphart, Arend |
collection | PubMed |
description | The major predecessor to Ringen’s and my own efforts to measure democratic quality in terms of the purpose of democracy is Robert Dahl’s seminal book Polyarchy (1971). Measuring the quality of democracy requires two prior judgments: (1) making sure that, in terms of institutional characteristics, a country is sufficiently democratic, and that, as a minimum, it has universal suffrage, and (2) that its democracy has been uninterrupted for a minimum number of years. To an important extent, higher democratic quality can be attributed to institutional characteristics of consensus democracy, especially proportional representation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3003825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30038252011-01-19 Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies Lijphart, Arend Society Symposium: Measuring Democracy The major predecessor to Ringen’s and my own efforts to measure democratic quality in terms of the purpose of democracy is Robert Dahl’s seminal book Polyarchy (1971). Measuring the quality of democracy requires two prior judgments: (1) making sure that, in terms of institutional characteristics, a country is sufficiently democratic, and that, as a minimum, it has universal suffrage, and (2) that its democracy has been uninterrupted for a minimum number of years. To an important extent, higher democratic quality can be attributed to institutional characteristics of consensus democracy, especially proportional representation. Springer-Verlag 2010-11-24 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3003825/ /pubmed/21258634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9389-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Symposium: Measuring Democracy Lijphart, Arend Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies |
title | Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies |
title_full | Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies |
title_fullStr | Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies |
title_full_unstemmed | Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies |
title_short | Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies |
title_sort | democratic quality in stable democracies |
topic | Symposium: Measuring Democracy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3003825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21258634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-010-9389-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lijphartarend democraticqualityinstabledemocracies |