Cargando…

Smoking prevalence in the European Union: a comparison of national and transnational prevalence survey methods and results

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the European Commission Eurobarometer survey of 27 European Union (EU) member states produces reliable smoking prevalence estimates when compared to national prevalence survey data, and to identify approaches to standardising the measurement of smoking prevalence in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bogdanovica, Ilze, Godfrey, Fiona, McNeill, Ann, Britton, John
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3003865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20966129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2010.036103
_version_ 1782193918112169984
author Bogdanovica, Ilze
Godfrey, Fiona
McNeill, Ann
Britton, John
author_facet Bogdanovica, Ilze
Godfrey, Fiona
McNeill, Ann
Britton, John
author_sort Bogdanovica, Ilze
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the European Commission Eurobarometer survey of 27 European Union (EU) member states produces reliable smoking prevalence estimates when compared to national prevalence survey data, and to identify approaches to standardising the measurement of smoking prevalence in the EU. METHODS: This was a direct comparison of questions, sampling methods and smoking prevalence estimates, between the 2006 Eurobarometer study and contemporaneous national surveys. All 27 EU member states were included. Participants were people surveyed in the 2006 Eurobarometer study and in various national surveys in the closest year to 2006 for which data were available. The main outcome measures were the mean and range of differences in prevalence estimates between the Eurobarometer and national surveys. RESULTS: Most national surveys used similar multistage sampling methods and involved sample sizes of 3000 or more, but the phrasing of the questions used to define smoking, the inclusion or exclusion of occasional smokers, the age ranges of participants and the frequency of national surveys varied substantially between countries. The Eurobarometer study used the same questions in all countries but in sample sizes of 1000, or in 3 countries, 500. Eurobarometer 2006 smoking prevalence estimates were on average 0.37 percentage points higher than those in national surveys, but with a 95% range from −10.49 to +11.23 percentage points. At the extremes, the equivalent national prevalence estimate for Slovakia was 13.0% higher and for the UK 10.0% lower than the Eurobarometer figure. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of the prevalence of smoking, the biggest avoidable public health threat in the European Union, are highly discrepant within countries between national and European Commission survey estimates. Monitoring national smoking prevalence on a regular basis, using standardised methods in representative population samples, is an urgent priority for the EU.
format Text
id pubmed-3003865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30038652010-12-23 Smoking prevalence in the European Union: a comparison of national and transnational prevalence survey methods and results Bogdanovica, Ilze Godfrey, Fiona McNeill, Ann Britton, John Tob Control Research Paper OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the European Commission Eurobarometer survey of 27 European Union (EU) member states produces reliable smoking prevalence estimates when compared to national prevalence survey data, and to identify approaches to standardising the measurement of smoking prevalence in the EU. METHODS: This was a direct comparison of questions, sampling methods and smoking prevalence estimates, between the 2006 Eurobarometer study and contemporaneous national surveys. All 27 EU member states were included. Participants were people surveyed in the 2006 Eurobarometer study and in various national surveys in the closest year to 2006 for which data were available. The main outcome measures were the mean and range of differences in prevalence estimates between the Eurobarometer and national surveys. RESULTS: Most national surveys used similar multistage sampling methods and involved sample sizes of 3000 or more, but the phrasing of the questions used to define smoking, the inclusion or exclusion of occasional smokers, the age ranges of participants and the frequency of national surveys varied substantially between countries. The Eurobarometer study used the same questions in all countries but in sample sizes of 1000, or in 3 countries, 500. Eurobarometer 2006 smoking prevalence estimates were on average 0.37 percentage points higher than those in national surveys, but with a 95% range from −10.49 to +11.23 percentage points. At the extremes, the equivalent national prevalence estimate for Slovakia was 13.0% higher and for the UK 10.0% lower than the Eurobarometer figure. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of the prevalence of smoking, the biggest avoidable public health threat in the European Union, are highly discrepant within countries between national and European Commission survey estimates. Monitoring national smoking prevalence on a regular basis, using standardised methods in representative population samples, is an urgent priority for the EU. BMJ Group 2010-10-21 2011-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3003865/ /pubmed/20966129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2010.036103 Text en © 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Bogdanovica, Ilze
Godfrey, Fiona
McNeill, Ann
Britton, John
Smoking prevalence in the European Union: a comparison of national and transnational prevalence survey methods and results
title Smoking prevalence in the European Union: a comparison of national and transnational prevalence survey methods and results
title_full Smoking prevalence in the European Union: a comparison of national and transnational prevalence survey methods and results
title_fullStr Smoking prevalence in the European Union: a comparison of national and transnational prevalence survey methods and results
title_full_unstemmed Smoking prevalence in the European Union: a comparison of national and transnational prevalence survey methods and results
title_short Smoking prevalence in the European Union: a comparison of national and transnational prevalence survey methods and results
title_sort smoking prevalence in the european union: a comparison of national and transnational prevalence survey methods and results
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3003865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20966129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2010.036103
work_keys_str_mv AT bogdanovicailze smokingprevalenceintheeuropeanunionacomparisonofnationalandtransnationalprevalencesurveymethodsandresults
AT godfreyfiona smokingprevalenceintheeuropeanunionacomparisonofnationalandtransnationalprevalencesurveymethodsandresults
AT mcneillann smokingprevalenceintheeuropeanunionacomparisonofnationalandtransnationalprevalencesurveymethodsandresults
AT brittonjohn smokingprevalenceintheeuropeanunionacomparisonofnationalandtransnationalprevalencesurveymethodsandresults