Cargando…
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
Of the various options for patients with end stage renal disease, kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for a suitable patient. The kidney for transplantation is retrieved from either a cadaver or a live donor. Living donor nephrectomy has been developed as a method to address the shortf...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3004117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21206658 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.19262 |
_version_ | 1782193953212203008 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Nitin Raina, Pamposh Kumar, Anant |
author_facet | Gupta, Nitin Raina, Pamposh Kumar, Anant |
author_sort | Gupta, Nitin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Of the various options for patients with end stage renal disease, kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for a suitable patient. The kidney for transplantation is retrieved from either a cadaver or a live donor. Living donor nephrectomy has been developed as a method to address the shortfall in cadaveric kidneys available for transplantation. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN), by reducing postoperative pain, shortening convalescence, and improving the cosmetic outcome of the donor nephrectomy, has shown the potential to increase the number of living kidney donations further by removing some of the disincentives inherent to donation itself. The technique of LLDN has undergone evolution at different transplant centers and many modifications have been done to improve donor safety and recipient outcome. Virtually all donors eligible for an open surgical procedure may also undergo the laparoscopic operation. Various earlier contraindications to LDN, such as right donor kidney, multiple vessels, anomalous vasculature and obesity have been overcome with increasing experience. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy can be done transperitoneally or retroperitoneally on either side. The approach is most commonly transperitoneal, which allows adequate working space and easy dissection. A review of literature and our experience with regards to standard approach and the modifications is presented including a cost saving model for the developing countries. An assessment has been made, of the impact of LDN on the outcome of donor and the recipient. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3004117 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30041172011-01-04 Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy Gupta, Nitin Raina, Pamposh Kumar, Anant J Minim Access Surg Review Article Of the various options for patients with end stage renal disease, kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for a suitable patient. The kidney for transplantation is retrieved from either a cadaver or a live donor. Living donor nephrectomy has been developed as a method to address the shortfall in cadaveric kidneys available for transplantation. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN), by reducing postoperative pain, shortening convalescence, and improving the cosmetic outcome of the donor nephrectomy, has shown the potential to increase the number of living kidney donations further by removing some of the disincentives inherent to donation itself. The technique of LLDN has undergone evolution at different transplant centers and many modifications have been done to improve donor safety and recipient outcome. Virtually all donors eligible for an open surgical procedure may also undergo the laparoscopic operation. Various earlier contraindications to LDN, such as right donor kidney, multiple vessels, anomalous vasculature and obesity have been overcome with increasing experience. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy can be done transperitoneally or retroperitoneally on either side. The approach is most commonly transperitoneal, which allows adequate working space and easy dissection. A review of literature and our experience with regards to standard approach and the modifications is presented including a cost saving model for the developing countries. An assessment has been made, of the impact of LDN on the outcome of donor and the recipient. Medknow Publications 2005-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3004117/ /pubmed/21206658 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.19262 Text en © Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Gupta, Nitin Raina, Pamposh Kumar, Anant Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy |
title | Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy |
title_full | Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy |
title_short | Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy |
title_sort | laparoscopic donor nephrectomy |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3004117/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21206658 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.19262 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptanitin laparoscopicdonornephrectomy AT rainapamposh laparoscopicdonornephrectomy AT kumaranant laparoscopicdonornephrectomy |