Cargando…
Laparoscopic reconstructive urology
OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic reconstructive urology is undergoing rapid change. We review the current status of laparoscopic reconstructive urology, with particular respect to pyeloplasty and reconstructive ureteric surgery. METHODS: An extensive Medline search of reconstructive laparoscopic procedures w...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3004120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21206661 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.19265 |
_version_ | 1782193953918943232 |
---|---|
author | Murphy, Declan Challacombe, Ben Rane, Abhay |
author_facet | Murphy, Declan Challacombe, Ben Rane, Abhay |
author_sort | Murphy, Declan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic reconstructive urology is undergoing rapid change. We review the current status of laparoscopic reconstructive urology, with particular respect to pyeloplasty and reconstructive ureteric surgery. METHODS: An extensive Medline search of reconstructive laparoscopic procedures was undertaken. The initial reports and large series reports of a range of procedures was examined and summarised. The most commonly practised procedure within this remit is laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Several series of over 100 patients have been published. Success rates average over 90% for laparoscopic pyeloplasty with a low complication rate. Much less common laparoscopic reconstructive urological procedures include ureteric re-implantation, Boari flap, urinary diversion and transuretero-ureterostomy. The results of these are encouraging. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty may be safely performed by either the transperitoneal or retroperitoneal routes with excellent results. It should be considered the “gold standard” for the management of UPJ obstruction, especially in those patients with significant hydronephrosis, renal impairment or a crossing vessel. Laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation, Boari flap, urinary diversion and transuretero-ureterostomy have been performed by experienced laparoscopic urologists with encouraging results. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3004120 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30041202011-01-04 Laparoscopic reconstructive urology Murphy, Declan Challacombe, Ben Rane, Abhay J Minim Access Surg Review Article OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic reconstructive urology is undergoing rapid change. We review the current status of laparoscopic reconstructive urology, with particular respect to pyeloplasty and reconstructive ureteric surgery. METHODS: An extensive Medline search of reconstructive laparoscopic procedures was undertaken. The initial reports and large series reports of a range of procedures was examined and summarised. The most commonly practised procedure within this remit is laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Several series of over 100 patients have been published. Success rates average over 90% for laparoscopic pyeloplasty with a low complication rate. Much less common laparoscopic reconstructive urological procedures include ureteric re-implantation, Boari flap, urinary diversion and transuretero-ureterostomy. The results of these are encouraging. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty may be safely performed by either the transperitoneal or retroperitoneal routes with excellent results. It should be considered the “gold standard” for the management of UPJ obstruction, especially in those patients with significant hydronephrosis, renal impairment or a crossing vessel. Laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation, Boari flap, urinary diversion and transuretero-ureterostomy have been performed by experienced laparoscopic urologists with encouraging results. Medknow Publications 2005-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3004120/ /pubmed/21206661 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.19265 Text en © Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Murphy, Declan Challacombe, Ben Rane, Abhay Laparoscopic reconstructive urology |
title | Laparoscopic reconstructive urology |
title_full | Laparoscopic reconstructive urology |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic reconstructive urology |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic reconstructive urology |
title_short | Laparoscopic reconstructive urology |
title_sort | laparoscopic reconstructive urology |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3004120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21206661 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.19265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murphydeclan laparoscopicreconstructiveurology AT challacombeben laparoscopicreconstructiveurology AT raneabhay laparoscopicreconstructiveurology |