Cargando…

Laparoscopic reconstructive urology

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic reconstructive urology is undergoing rapid change. We review the current status of laparoscopic reconstructive urology, with particular respect to pyeloplasty and reconstructive ureteric surgery. METHODS: An extensive Medline search of reconstructive laparoscopic procedures w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Declan, Challacombe, Ben, Rane, Abhay
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3004120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21206661
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.19265
_version_ 1782193953918943232
author Murphy, Declan
Challacombe, Ben
Rane, Abhay
author_facet Murphy, Declan
Challacombe, Ben
Rane, Abhay
author_sort Murphy, Declan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic reconstructive urology is undergoing rapid change. We review the current status of laparoscopic reconstructive urology, with particular respect to pyeloplasty and reconstructive ureteric surgery. METHODS: An extensive Medline search of reconstructive laparoscopic procedures was undertaken. The initial reports and large series reports of a range of procedures was examined and summarised. The most commonly practised procedure within this remit is laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Several series of over 100 patients have been published. Success rates average over 90% for laparoscopic pyeloplasty with a low complication rate. Much less common laparoscopic reconstructive urological procedures include ureteric re-implantation, Boari flap, urinary diversion and transuretero-ureterostomy. The results of these are encouraging. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty may be safely performed by either the transperitoneal or retroperitoneal routes with excellent results. It should be considered the “gold standard” for the management of UPJ obstruction, especially in those patients with significant hydronephrosis, renal impairment or a crossing vessel. Laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation, Boari flap, urinary diversion and transuretero-ureterostomy have been performed by experienced laparoscopic urologists with encouraging results.
format Text
id pubmed-3004120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30041202011-01-04 Laparoscopic reconstructive urology Murphy, Declan Challacombe, Ben Rane, Abhay J Minim Access Surg Review Article OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic reconstructive urology is undergoing rapid change. We review the current status of laparoscopic reconstructive urology, with particular respect to pyeloplasty and reconstructive ureteric surgery. METHODS: An extensive Medline search of reconstructive laparoscopic procedures was undertaken. The initial reports and large series reports of a range of procedures was examined and summarised. The most commonly practised procedure within this remit is laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Several series of over 100 patients have been published. Success rates average over 90% for laparoscopic pyeloplasty with a low complication rate. Much less common laparoscopic reconstructive urological procedures include ureteric re-implantation, Boari flap, urinary diversion and transuretero-ureterostomy. The results of these are encouraging. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty may be safely performed by either the transperitoneal or retroperitoneal routes with excellent results. It should be considered the “gold standard” for the management of UPJ obstruction, especially in those patients with significant hydronephrosis, renal impairment or a crossing vessel. Laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation, Boari flap, urinary diversion and transuretero-ureterostomy have been performed by experienced laparoscopic urologists with encouraging results. Medknow Publications 2005-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3004120/ /pubmed/21206661 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.19265 Text en © Journal of Minimal Access Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Murphy, Declan
Challacombe, Ben
Rane, Abhay
Laparoscopic reconstructive urology
title Laparoscopic reconstructive urology
title_full Laparoscopic reconstructive urology
title_fullStr Laparoscopic reconstructive urology
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic reconstructive urology
title_short Laparoscopic reconstructive urology
title_sort laparoscopic reconstructive urology
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3004120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21206661
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.19265
work_keys_str_mv AT murphydeclan laparoscopicreconstructiveurology
AT challacombeben laparoscopicreconstructiveurology
AT raneabhay laparoscopicreconstructiveurology