Cargando…
Rarely selected distractors in high stakes medical multiple-choice examinations and their recognition by item authors: a simulation and survey
BACKGROUND: Many medical exams use 5 options for multiple choice questions (MCQs), although the literature suggests that 3 options are optimal. Previous studies on this topic have often been based on non-medical examinations, so we sought to analyse rarely selected, 'non-functional' distra...
Autores principales: | Rogausch, Anja, Hofer, Rainer, Krebs, René |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3004925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21106066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-85 |
Ejemplares similares
-
How Much g Is in the Distractor? Re-Thinking Item-Analysis of Multiple-Choice Items
por: Forthmann, Boris, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Multiple-Choice Item Distractor Development Using Topic Modeling Approaches
por: Shin, Jinnie, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Relations of the Number of Functioning Distractors With the Item Difficulty Index and the Item Discrimination Power in the Multiple Choice Questions
por: Chauhan, Girish R, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Stakes and expertise modulate conformity in economic choice
por: Greenberg, Jordanne, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The Impact of item flaws, testing at low cognitive level, and low distractor functioning on multiple-choice question quality
por: Ali, Syed Haris, et al.
Publicado: (2015)