Cargando…

A large-scale meta-analysis to refine colorectal cancer risk estimates associated with MUTYH variants

BACKGROUND: Defective DNA repair has a causal role in hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC). Defects in the base excision repair gene MUTYH are responsible for MUTYH-associated polyposis and CRC predisposition as an autosomal recessive trait. Numerous reports have suggested MUTYH mono-allelic variants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Theodoratou, E, Campbell, H, Tenesa, A, Houlston, R, Webb, E, Lubbe, S, Broderick, P, Gallinger, S, Croitoru, E M, Jenkins, M A, Win, A K, Cleary, S P, Koessler, T, Pharoah, P D, Küry, S, Bézieau, S, Buecher, B, Ellis, N A, Peterlongo, P, Offit, K, Aaltonen, L A, Enholm, S, Lindblom, A, Zhou, X-L, Tomlinson, I P, Moreno, V, Blanco, I, Capellà, G, Barnetson, R, Porteous, M E, Dunlop, M G, Farrington, S M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3008602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21063410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605966
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Defective DNA repair has a causal role in hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC). Defects in the base excision repair gene MUTYH are responsible for MUTYH-associated polyposis and CRC predisposition as an autosomal recessive trait. Numerous reports have suggested MUTYH mono-allelic variants to be low penetrance risk alleles. We report a large collaborative meta-analysis to assess and refine CRC risk estimates associated with bi-allelic and mono-allelic MUTYH variants and investigate age and sex influence on risk. METHODS: MUTYH genotype data were included from 20 565 cases and 15 524 controls. Three logistic regression models were tested: a crude model; adjusted for age and sex; adjusted for age, sex and study. RESULTS: All three models produced very similar results. MUTYH bi-allelic carriers demonstrated a 28-fold increase in risk (95% confidence interval (CI): 6.95–115). Significant bi-allelic effects were also observed for G396D and Y179C/G396D compound heterozygotes and a marginal mono-allelic effect for variant Y179C (odds ratio (OR)=1.34; 95% CI: 1.00–1.80). A pooled meta-analysis of all published and unpublished datasets submitted showed bi-allelic effects for MUTYH, G396D and Y179C (OR=10.8, 95% CI: 5.02–23.2; OR=6.47, 95% CI: 2.33–18.0; OR=3.35, 95% CI: 1.14–9.89) and marginal mono-allelic effect for variants MUTYH (OR=1.16, 95% CI: 1.00–1.34) and Y179C alone (OR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.01–1.77). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this large study refines estimates of disease risk associated with mono-allelic and bi-allelic MUTYH carriers.