Cargando…
Short clones or long clones? A simulation study on the use of paired reads in metagenomics
BACKGROUND: Metagenomics is the study of environmental samples using sequencing. Rapid advances in sequencing technology are fueling a vast increase in the number and scope of metagenomics projects. Most metagenome sequencing projects so far have been based on Sanger or Roche-454 sequencing, as only...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3009484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20122183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S1-S12 |
_version_ | 1782194688909901824 |
---|---|
author | Mitra, Suparna Schubach, Max Huson, Daniel H |
author_facet | Mitra, Suparna Schubach, Max Huson, Daniel H |
author_sort | Mitra, Suparna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Metagenomics is the study of environmental samples using sequencing. Rapid advances in sequencing technology are fueling a vast increase in the number and scope of metagenomics projects. Most metagenome sequencing projects so far have been based on Sanger or Roche-454 sequencing, as only these technologies provide long enough reads, while Illumina sequencing has not been considered suitable for metagenomic studies due to a short read length of only 35 bp. However, now that reads of length 75 bp can be sequenced in pairs, Illumina sequencing has become a viable option for metagenome studies. RESULTS: This paper addresses the problem of taxonomical analysis of paired reads. We describe a new feature of our metagenome analysis software MEGAN that allows one to process sequencing reads in pairs and makes assignments of such reads based on the combined bit scores of their matches to reference sequences. Using this new software in a simulation study, we investigate the use of Illumina paired-sequencing in taxonomical analysis and compare the performance of single reads, short clones and long clones. In addition, we also compare against simulated Roche-454 sequencing runs. CONCLUSION: This work shows that paired reads perform better than single reads, as expected, but also, perhaps slightly less obviously, that long clones allow more specific assignments than short ones. A new version of the program MEGAN that explicitly takes paired reads into account is available from our website. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3009484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30094842010-12-23 Short clones or long clones? A simulation study on the use of paired reads in metagenomics Mitra, Suparna Schubach, Max Huson, Daniel H BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: Metagenomics is the study of environmental samples using sequencing. Rapid advances in sequencing technology are fueling a vast increase in the number and scope of metagenomics projects. Most metagenome sequencing projects so far have been based on Sanger or Roche-454 sequencing, as only these technologies provide long enough reads, while Illumina sequencing has not been considered suitable for metagenomic studies due to a short read length of only 35 bp. However, now that reads of length 75 bp can be sequenced in pairs, Illumina sequencing has become a viable option for metagenome studies. RESULTS: This paper addresses the problem of taxonomical analysis of paired reads. We describe a new feature of our metagenome analysis software MEGAN that allows one to process sequencing reads in pairs and makes assignments of such reads based on the combined bit scores of their matches to reference sequences. Using this new software in a simulation study, we investigate the use of Illumina paired-sequencing in taxonomical analysis and compare the performance of single reads, short clones and long clones. In addition, we also compare against simulated Roche-454 sequencing runs. CONCLUSION: This work shows that paired reads perform better than single reads, as expected, but also, perhaps slightly less obviously, that long clones allow more specific assignments than short ones. A new version of the program MEGAN that explicitly takes paired reads into account is available from our website. BioMed Central 2010-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3009484/ /pubmed/20122183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S1-S12 Text en Copyright ©2010 Mitra et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Mitra, Suparna Schubach, Max Huson, Daniel H Short clones or long clones? A simulation study on the use of paired reads in metagenomics |
title | Short clones or long clones? A simulation study on the use of paired reads in metagenomics |
title_full | Short clones or long clones? A simulation study on the use of paired reads in metagenomics |
title_fullStr | Short clones or long clones? A simulation study on the use of paired reads in metagenomics |
title_full_unstemmed | Short clones or long clones? A simulation study on the use of paired reads in metagenomics |
title_short | Short clones or long clones? A simulation study on the use of paired reads in metagenomics |
title_sort | short clones or long clones? a simulation study on the use of paired reads in metagenomics |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3009484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20122183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S1-S12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mitrasuparna shortclonesorlongclonesasimulationstudyontheuseofpairedreadsinmetagenomics AT schubachmax shortclonesorlongclonesasimulationstudyontheuseofpairedreadsinmetagenomics AT husondanielh shortclonesorlongclonesasimulationstudyontheuseofpairedreadsinmetagenomics |