Cargando…

Comparison of PGH(2 )binding site in prostaglandin synthases

BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin H(2 )(PGH(2)) is a common precursor for the synthesis of five different Prostanoids via specific Prostanoid Synthases. The binding of this substrate with these Synthases is not properly understood. Moreover, currently no crystal structure of complexes bound with PGH(2 )has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paragi-Vedanthi, Padmapriya, Doble, Mukesh
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3009524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20122226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S1-S51
_version_ 1782194698721427456
author Paragi-Vedanthi, Padmapriya
Doble, Mukesh
author_facet Paragi-Vedanthi, Padmapriya
Doble, Mukesh
author_sort Paragi-Vedanthi, Padmapriya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin H(2 )(PGH(2)) is a common precursor for the synthesis of five different Prostanoids via specific Prostanoid Synthases. The binding of this substrate with these Synthases is not properly understood. Moreover, currently no crystal structure of complexes bound with PGH(2 )has been reported. Hence, understanding the interactions of PGH(2 )and characterizing its binding sites in these synthases is crucial for developing novel therapeutics based on these proteins as targets. RESULTS: Shape and physico-chemical properties of the PGH(2 )binding sites of the four prostanoid synthases were analyzed and compared in order to understand the molecular basis of the specificity. This study provides models with predicted pockets for the binding of PGH(2 )with PGD, PGE, PGF and PGI Synthases. The results closely match with available experimental data. The comparison showed seven physico-chemical features that are common to the four PGH(2 )binding sites. However this common pattern is not statistically unique and is not specific enough to distinguish between proteins that can or cannot bind PGH(2). A large scale search in ASTRAL data bank, a non redundant Protein Data Bank, for a similar pattern showed the uniqueness of each of the PGH(2 )binding site in these Synthases. CONCLUSION: The binding pockets in PGDS, PGES, PGFS and PGIS are unique and do not share significant commonality which can be characterized as a PGH(2 )binding site. Local comparison of these protein structures highlights a case of convergent evolution in analogous functional sites
format Text
id pubmed-3009524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30095242010-12-23 Comparison of PGH(2 )binding site in prostaglandin synthases Paragi-Vedanthi, Padmapriya Doble, Mukesh BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin H(2 )(PGH(2)) is a common precursor for the synthesis of five different Prostanoids via specific Prostanoid Synthases. The binding of this substrate with these Synthases is not properly understood. Moreover, currently no crystal structure of complexes bound with PGH(2 )has been reported. Hence, understanding the interactions of PGH(2 )and characterizing its binding sites in these synthases is crucial for developing novel therapeutics based on these proteins as targets. RESULTS: Shape and physico-chemical properties of the PGH(2 )binding sites of the four prostanoid synthases were analyzed and compared in order to understand the molecular basis of the specificity. This study provides models with predicted pockets for the binding of PGH(2 )with PGD, PGE, PGF and PGI Synthases. The results closely match with available experimental data. The comparison showed seven physico-chemical features that are common to the four PGH(2 )binding sites. However this common pattern is not statistically unique and is not specific enough to distinguish between proteins that can or cannot bind PGH(2). A large scale search in ASTRAL data bank, a non redundant Protein Data Bank, for a similar pattern showed the uniqueness of each of the PGH(2 )binding site in these Synthases. CONCLUSION: The binding pockets in PGDS, PGES, PGFS and PGIS are unique and do not share significant commonality which can be characterized as a PGH(2 )binding site. Local comparison of these protein structures highlights a case of convergent evolution in analogous functional sites BioMed Central 2010-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3009524/ /pubmed/20122226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S1-S51 Text en Copyright ©2010 Paragi-Vedanthi and Doble; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Paragi-Vedanthi, Padmapriya
Doble, Mukesh
Comparison of PGH(2 )binding site in prostaglandin synthases
title Comparison of PGH(2 )binding site in prostaglandin synthases
title_full Comparison of PGH(2 )binding site in prostaglandin synthases
title_fullStr Comparison of PGH(2 )binding site in prostaglandin synthases
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of PGH(2 )binding site in prostaglandin synthases
title_short Comparison of PGH(2 )binding site in prostaglandin synthases
title_sort comparison of pgh(2 )binding site in prostaglandin synthases
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3009524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20122226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-S1-S51
work_keys_str_mv AT paragivedanthipadmapriya comparisonofpgh2bindingsiteinprostaglandinsynthases
AT doblemukesh comparisonofpgh2bindingsiteinprostaglandinsynthases