Cargando…

Improved Flutter Ablation Outcomes Using a 10mm-tip Ablation Catheter

INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency(RF) ablation has become the first line of therapy for atrial flutter(AFL). Advances in catheter and mapping technologies have led to better understanding and different approaches for treating this arrhythmia. We describe the results of different approaches to ablate this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leiria, Tiago Luiz Luz, Becker, Giuliano, Kus, Teresa, Essebag, Vidal, Hadjis, Tomy, Sturmer, Marcio Lerch
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Indian Heart Rhythm Society 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3009985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21197277
_version_ 1782194756597579776
author Leiria, Tiago Luiz Luz
Becker, Giuliano
Kus, Teresa
Essebag, Vidal
Hadjis, Tomy
Sturmer, Marcio Lerch
author_facet Leiria, Tiago Luiz Luz
Becker, Giuliano
Kus, Teresa
Essebag, Vidal
Hadjis, Tomy
Sturmer, Marcio Lerch
author_sort Leiria, Tiago Luiz Luz
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency(RF) ablation has become the first line of therapy for atrial flutter(AFL). Advances in catheter and mapping technologies have led to better understanding and different approaches for treating this arrhythmia. We describe the results of different approaches to ablate this arrhythmia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 198 patients with isthmus dependent AFL. The techniques used were: 10mm-tip catheter with power set to 100w, 8mm-tip catheter with power set to 60W and irrigated tip catheter. RESULTS: 212 procedures, including redos were done in 198 consecutive patients. We used irrigated tip catheters in 14 procedures, 8mm-tip in 55 procedures, and 10mm-tip in 143 procedures. Bidirectional block was achieved in 97.6% of cases with all techniques, with no difference among them. Procedure time was shorter in the 10mm-tip versus 8mm-tip(69.6±30.6min vs.105±43min) or irrigated tip(180±90min) (P<0.05). Fluoroscopy time was also shorter in the 10mm-tip versus 8mm-tip (24±18min vs. 37±23min) or irrigated tip (110±25min)(P<0.05). The cumulative incidence of failure during follow-up was 1.2%/year in the 10mm, 10.1%year in the 8mm and 6.9%year in the irrigated tip. The survival free of a new procedure was significantly higher among 10mm patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our series we found a high rate of acute success with the use of different techniques for AFL ablation. Procedure and fluoroscopic times were shorter with the use of 10mm-tip as compared with the others techniques. The long-term risk of recurrence was lower when we used the 10mm-tip catheter and the survival free of a second procedure was higher among patients treated with this catheter.
format Text
id pubmed-3009985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Indian Heart Rhythm Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30099852010-12-30 Improved Flutter Ablation Outcomes Using a 10mm-tip Ablation Catheter Leiria, Tiago Luiz Luz Becker, Giuliano Kus, Teresa Essebag, Vidal Hadjis, Tomy Sturmer, Marcio Lerch Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Original Article INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency(RF) ablation has become the first line of therapy for atrial flutter(AFL). Advances in catheter and mapping technologies have led to better understanding and different approaches for treating this arrhythmia. We describe the results of different approaches to ablate this arrhythmia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 198 patients with isthmus dependent AFL. The techniques used were: 10mm-tip catheter with power set to 100w, 8mm-tip catheter with power set to 60W and irrigated tip catheter. RESULTS: 212 procedures, including redos were done in 198 consecutive patients. We used irrigated tip catheters in 14 procedures, 8mm-tip in 55 procedures, and 10mm-tip in 143 procedures. Bidirectional block was achieved in 97.6% of cases with all techniques, with no difference among them. Procedure time was shorter in the 10mm-tip versus 8mm-tip(69.6±30.6min vs.105±43min) or irrigated tip(180±90min) (P<0.05). Fluoroscopy time was also shorter in the 10mm-tip versus 8mm-tip (24±18min vs. 37±23min) or irrigated tip (110±25min)(P<0.05). The cumulative incidence of failure during follow-up was 1.2%/year in the 10mm, 10.1%year in the 8mm and 6.9%year in the irrigated tip. The survival free of a new procedure was significantly higher among 10mm patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our series we found a high rate of acute success with the use of different techniques for AFL ablation. Procedure and fluoroscopic times were shorter with the use of 10mm-tip as compared with the others techniques. The long-term risk of recurrence was lower when we used the 10mm-tip catheter and the survival free of a second procedure was higher among patients treated with this catheter. Indian Heart Rhythm Society 2010-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3009985/ /pubmed/21197277 Text en Copyright: © 2010 Leiria et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Leiria, Tiago Luiz Luz
Becker, Giuliano
Kus, Teresa
Essebag, Vidal
Hadjis, Tomy
Sturmer, Marcio Lerch
Improved Flutter Ablation Outcomes Using a 10mm-tip Ablation Catheter
title Improved Flutter Ablation Outcomes Using a 10mm-tip Ablation Catheter
title_full Improved Flutter Ablation Outcomes Using a 10mm-tip Ablation Catheter
title_fullStr Improved Flutter Ablation Outcomes Using a 10mm-tip Ablation Catheter
title_full_unstemmed Improved Flutter Ablation Outcomes Using a 10mm-tip Ablation Catheter
title_short Improved Flutter Ablation Outcomes Using a 10mm-tip Ablation Catheter
title_sort improved flutter ablation outcomes using a 10mm-tip ablation catheter
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3009985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21197277
work_keys_str_mv AT leiriatiagoluizluz improvedflutterablationoutcomesusinga10mmtipablationcatheter
AT beckergiuliano improvedflutterablationoutcomesusinga10mmtipablationcatheter
AT kusteresa improvedflutterablationoutcomesusinga10mmtipablationcatheter
AT essebagvidal improvedflutterablationoutcomesusinga10mmtipablationcatheter
AT hadjistomy improvedflutterablationoutcomesusinga10mmtipablationcatheter
AT sturmermarciolerch improvedflutterablationoutcomesusinga10mmtipablationcatheter