Cargando…

Diurnal IOP-lowering efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% compared with tafluprost 0.0015% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

PURPOSE: To compare the diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% and tafluprost 0.0015% administered to patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, crossover design tri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Schnober, Dietmar, Hofmann, Günter, Maier, Hubert, Scherzer, Maria-Luise, Ogundele, Abayomi B, Jasek, Mark C
Formato:	Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:	Original Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3009992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21191441 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S13720

Ejemplares similares

Efficacy and safety of fixed-combination travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% in patients transitioning from bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% combination therapy
por: Schnober, Dietmar, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Efficacy and tolerability of preservative-free tafluprost 0.0015% in Korean patients with glaucoma
por: Hwang, Young Hoon
Publicado: (2014)

A randomized crossover study comparing tafluprost 0.005% with travoprost 0.004% in patients with normal-tension glaucoma
por: Mizoguchi, Takanori, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Efficacy and safety of tafluprost 0.0015% – retrospective analysis of real-world data from the Philippines
por: Tumbocon, Joseph Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Pooled results of two randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% in fixed combination versus concomitant travoprost 0.004% and timolol 0.5%
por: Gross, Ronald L, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Efficacy and tolerability of preservative-free 0.0015% tafluprost in glaucoma patients: a prospective crossover study
por: Lee, Wonseok, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

First experience with BAK-free travoprost 0.004% in topical glaucoma medication
por: Gado, Ahmed Salah, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Efficacy of the travoprost/timolol fixed combination versus the concomitant use of travoprost 0.004% and timolol 0.1% gel formulation
por: Kozobolis, Vassilios, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Sustained intraocular pressure reduction throughout the day with travoprost ophthalmic solution 0.004%
por: Dubiner, Harvey B, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Crossover randomized study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of preservative-free Tafluprost 0.0015% to Latanoprost 0.005% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma
por: Hagras, Sherein M, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of travoprost 0.004% BAK-free versus prior treatment with latanoprost 0.005% in Japanese patients
por: Miyashiro, Michael J, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Prospective Observational Post-marketing Study of Tafluprost 0.0015%/Timolol 0.5% Combination Ophthalmic Solution for Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: Short-Term Efficacy and Safety
por: Takagi, Yasutaka, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Preservative-free fixed combination of tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: results of an open-label observational study
por: Pillunat, Lutz E, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Comparing the Efficacy of Latanoprost (0.005%), Bimatoprost (0.03%), Travoprost (0.004%), and Timolol (0.5%) in the Treatment of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
por: Mishra, Deepak, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination as transition therapy in patients previously on prostaglandin analog monotherapy
por: Costa, Vital Paulino, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

A comfort comparison of travoprost BAK-free 0.004% versus latanoprost 0.005% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
por: Godfrey, David A, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Long term safety and tolerability of Tafluprost 0.0015% vs Timolol 0.1% preservative-free in ocular hypertensive and in primary open-angle glaucoma patients: a cross sectional study
por: Rolle, Teresa, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A 6-Month Study Comparing Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of the Preservative-free Fixed Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% and Timolol 0.5% versus Each of Its Individual Preservative-Free Components
por: Pfeiffer, Norbert, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Ocular surface status in glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients with existing corneal disorders switched from latanoprost 0.005% to tafluprost 0.0015%: comparison of two prostaglandin analogues with different concentrations of benzalkonium chloride
por: Wong, Tina T, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Patient adherence and persistence with topical ocular hypotensive therapy in real-world practice: a comparison of bimatoprost 0.01% and travoprost Z 0.004% ophthalmic solutions
por: Campbell, Joanna H, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Ocular hypotensive effect and safety of travoprost 0.004%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination after change of treatment regimen from β-blockers and prostaglandin analogs
por: Inoue, Kenji, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Late-day intraocular pressure–lowering efficacy and tolerability of travoprost 0.004% versus bimatoprost 0.01% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a randomized trial
por: DuBiner, Harvey B, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Efficacy and Tolerability of Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% Fixed-Dose Combination for the Treatment of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Inadequately Controlled with Beta-Blocker Monotherapy
por: Lerner, Simon Fabian, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A study of the safety and efficacy of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution compared to latanoprost 0.005% and timolol 0.5% dosed concomitantly in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
por: Rhee, Douglas J, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Aqueous humor penetration of topical bimatoprost 0.01% and bimatoprost 0.03% in rabbits
por: Ogundele, Abayomi B, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Dielectric and Electric Properties of Ba(0.996)La(0.004)Ti(0.999)O(3) Ceramics Doped with Europium and Hafnium Ions
por: Adamczyk-Habrajska, Małgorzata, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Analysis of the Responsiveness of Latanoprost, Travoprost, Bimatoprost, and Tafluprost in the Treatment of OAG/OHT Patients
por: Cai, Ziyan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

DRAFT ATLAS ATRECON manual (Version 0.015)
por: Offline Software Group
Publicado: (1994)

The diurnal and nocturnal effects of travoprost in normal-tension glaucoma
por: Seibold, Leonard K, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of Efficacy and Ocular Surface Disease Index Score between Bimatoprost, Latanoprost, Travoprost, and Tafluprost in Glaucoma Patients
por: El Hajj Moussa, Wissam Georges, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Safety and efficacy of changing to the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (DuoTrav) from prior mono- or adjunctive therapy
por: Pfeiffer, Norbert, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Clinical appraisal of tafluprost in the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension
por: Aihara, Makoto
Publicado: (2010)

Cosmology, Gravity, and the WMAP ratio 0.73:0.23:0.04
por: Smith, F D T
Publicado: (2004)

Impact of topical bimatoprost 0.01% and bimatoprost 0.03% on conjunctival irritation in rabbits
por: Ogundele, Abayomi B, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Two Cycles of Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.015%
por: Jung, Yu Seok, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Nodular basal cell carcinoma of the face successfully treated with ingenol mebutate 0.015% gel
por: Iannazzone, Silvia S., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Safety and efficacy of fixed-combination travoprost/timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension not controlled with timolol monotherapy
por: Jordão, Marcelo Lopes da Silva, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Diurnal Variation of IOP in Angle Closure Disease: Are We Doing Enough?
por: Bhartiya, Shibal, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Preclinical Efficacy Comparison of Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution 0.09% vs Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.05% vs Ciclosporin Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.1% in a NOD Mouse Model of Dry Eye Disease
por: Burade, Vinod, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Projected 24-hour post-dose ocular itching scores post-treatment with olopatadine 0.7% versus 0.2%
por: Fidler, Matthew L., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_pkku1n5vb5ptnb5380ob9kcfqf