Cargando…

Quantitative analysis of regulatory flexibility under changing environmental conditions

The circadian clock controls 24-h rhythms in many biological processes, allowing appropriate timing of biological rhythms relative to dawn and dusk. Known clock circuits include multiple, interlocked feedback loops. Theory suggested that multiple loops contribute the flexibility for molecular rhythm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edwards, Kieron D, Akman, Ozgur E, Knox, Kirsten, Lumsden, Peter J, Thomson, Adrian W, Brown, Paul E, Pokhilko, Alexandra, Kozma-Bognar, Laszlo, Nagy, Ferenc, Rand, David A, Millar, Andrew J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Molecular Biology Organization 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3010117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21045818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2010.81
_version_ 1782194781831561216
author Edwards, Kieron D
Akman, Ozgur E
Knox, Kirsten
Lumsden, Peter J
Thomson, Adrian W
Brown, Paul E
Pokhilko, Alexandra
Kozma-Bognar, Laszlo
Nagy, Ferenc
Rand, David A
Millar, Andrew J
author_facet Edwards, Kieron D
Akman, Ozgur E
Knox, Kirsten
Lumsden, Peter J
Thomson, Adrian W
Brown, Paul E
Pokhilko, Alexandra
Kozma-Bognar, Laszlo
Nagy, Ferenc
Rand, David A
Millar, Andrew J
author_sort Edwards, Kieron D
collection PubMed
description The circadian clock controls 24-h rhythms in many biological processes, allowing appropriate timing of biological rhythms relative to dawn and dusk. Known clock circuits include multiple, interlocked feedback loops. Theory suggested that multiple loops contribute the flexibility for molecular rhythms to track multiple phases of the external cycle. Clear dawn- and dusk-tracking rhythms illustrate the flexibility of timing in Ipomoea nil. Molecular clock components in Arabidopsis thaliana showed complex, photoperiod-dependent regulation, which was analysed by comparison with three contrasting models. A simple, quantitative measure, Dusk Sensitivity, was introduced to compare the behaviour of clock models with varying loop complexity. Evening-expressed clock genes showed photoperiod-dependent dusk sensitivity, as predicted by the three-loop model, whereas the one- and two-loop models tracked dawn and dusk, respectively. Output genes for starch degradation achieved dusk-tracking expression through light regulation, rather than a dusk-tracking rhythm. Model analysis predicted which biochemical processes could be manipulated to extend dusk tracking. Our results reveal how an operating principle of biological regulators applies specifically to the plant circadian clock.
format Text
id pubmed-3010117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher European Molecular Biology Organization
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30101172010-12-27 Quantitative analysis of regulatory flexibility under changing environmental conditions Edwards, Kieron D Akman, Ozgur E Knox, Kirsten Lumsden, Peter J Thomson, Adrian W Brown, Paul E Pokhilko, Alexandra Kozma-Bognar, Laszlo Nagy, Ferenc Rand, David A Millar, Andrew J Mol Syst Biol Article The circadian clock controls 24-h rhythms in many biological processes, allowing appropriate timing of biological rhythms relative to dawn and dusk. Known clock circuits include multiple, interlocked feedback loops. Theory suggested that multiple loops contribute the flexibility for molecular rhythms to track multiple phases of the external cycle. Clear dawn- and dusk-tracking rhythms illustrate the flexibility of timing in Ipomoea nil. Molecular clock components in Arabidopsis thaliana showed complex, photoperiod-dependent regulation, which was analysed by comparison with three contrasting models. A simple, quantitative measure, Dusk Sensitivity, was introduced to compare the behaviour of clock models with varying loop complexity. Evening-expressed clock genes showed photoperiod-dependent dusk sensitivity, as predicted by the three-loop model, whereas the one- and two-loop models tracked dawn and dusk, respectively. Output genes for starch degradation achieved dusk-tracking expression through light regulation, rather than a dusk-tracking rhythm. Model analysis predicted which biochemical processes could be manipulated to extend dusk tracking. Our results reveal how an operating principle of biological regulators applies specifically to the plant circadian clock. European Molecular Biology Organization 2010-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3010117/ /pubmed/21045818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2010.81 Text en Copyright © 2010, EMBO and Macmillan Publishers Limited https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial Share Alike 3.0 Unported License, which allows readers to alter, transform, or build upon the article and then distribute the resulting work under the same or similar license to this one. The work must be attributed back to the original author and commercial use is not permitted without specific permission.
spellingShingle Article
Edwards, Kieron D
Akman, Ozgur E
Knox, Kirsten
Lumsden, Peter J
Thomson, Adrian W
Brown, Paul E
Pokhilko, Alexandra
Kozma-Bognar, Laszlo
Nagy, Ferenc
Rand, David A
Millar, Andrew J
Quantitative analysis of regulatory flexibility under changing environmental conditions
title Quantitative analysis of regulatory flexibility under changing environmental conditions
title_full Quantitative analysis of regulatory flexibility under changing environmental conditions
title_fullStr Quantitative analysis of regulatory flexibility under changing environmental conditions
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative analysis of regulatory flexibility under changing environmental conditions
title_short Quantitative analysis of regulatory flexibility under changing environmental conditions
title_sort quantitative analysis of regulatory flexibility under changing environmental conditions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3010117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21045818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2010.81
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardskierond quantitativeanalysisofregulatoryflexibilityunderchangingenvironmentalconditions
AT akmanozgure quantitativeanalysisofregulatoryflexibilityunderchangingenvironmentalconditions
AT knoxkirsten quantitativeanalysisofregulatoryflexibilityunderchangingenvironmentalconditions
AT lumsdenpeterj quantitativeanalysisofregulatoryflexibilityunderchangingenvironmentalconditions
AT thomsonadrianw quantitativeanalysisofregulatoryflexibilityunderchangingenvironmentalconditions
AT brownpaule quantitativeanalysisofregulatoryflexibilityunderchangingenvironmentalconditions
AT pokhilkoalexandra quantitativeanalysisofregulatoryflexibilityunderchangingenvironmentalconditions
AT kozmabognarlaszlo quantitativeanalysisofregulatoryflexibilityunderchangingenvironmentalconditions
AT nagyferenc quantitativeanalysisofregulatoryflexibilityunderchangingenvironmentalconditions
AT randdavida quantitativeanalysisofregulatoryflexibilityunderchangingenvironmentalconditions
AT millarandrewj quantitativeanalysisofregulatoryflexibilityunderchangingenvironmentalconditions