Cargando…

Lucy's Flat Feet: The Relationship between the Ankle and Rearfoot Arching in Early Hominins

BACKGROUND: In the Plio-Pleistocene, the hominin foot evolved from a grasping appendage to a stiff, propulsive lever. Central to this transition was the development of the longitudinal arch, a structure that helps store elastic energy and stiffen the foot during bipedal locomotion. Direct evidence f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DeSilva, Jeremy M., Throckmorton, Zachary J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3010983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21203433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014432
_version_ 1782194862187085824
author DeSilva, Jeremy M.
Throckmorton, Zachary J.
author_facet DeSilva, Jeremy M.
Throckmorton, Zachary J.
author_sort DeSilva, Jeremy M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the Plio-Pleistocene, the hominin foot evolved from a grasping appendage to a stiff, propulsive lever. Central to this transition was the development of the longitudinal arch, a structure that helps store elastic energy and stiffen the foot during bipedal locomotion. Direct evidence for arch evolution, however, has been somewhat elusive given the failure of soft-tissue to fossilize. Paleoanthropologists have relied on footprints and bony correlates of arch development, though little consensus has emerged as to when the arch evolved. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here, we present evidence from radiographs of modern humans (n = 261) that the set of the distal tibia in the sagittal plane, henceforth referred to as the tibial arch angle, is related to rearfoot arching. Non-human primates have a posteriorly directed tibial arch angle, while most humans have an anteriorly directed tibial arch angle. Those humans with a posteriorly directed tibial arch angle (8%) have significantly lower talocalcaneal and talar declination angles, both measures of an asymptomatic flatfoot. Application of these results to the hominin fossil record reveals that a well developed rearfoot arch had evolved in Australopithecus afarensis. However, as in humans today, Australopithecus populations exhibited individual variation in foot morphology and arch development, and “Lucy” (A.L. 288-1), a 3.18 Myr-old female Australopithecus, likely possessed asymptomatic flat feet. Additional distal tibiae from the Plio-Pleistocene show variation in tibial arch angles, including two early Homo tibiae that also have slightly posteriorly directed tibial arch angles. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study finds that the rearfoot arch was present in the genus Australopithecus. However, the female Australopithecus afarensis “Lucy” has an ankle morphology consistent with non-pathological flat-footedness. This study suggests that, as in humans today, there was variation in arch development in Plio-Pleistocene hominins.
format Text
id pubmed-3010983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30109832011-01-03 Lucy's Flat Feet: The Relationship between the Ankle and Rearfoot Arching in Early Hominins DeSilva, Jeremy M. Throckmorton, Zachary J. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In the Plio-Pleistocene, the hominin foot evolved from a grasping appendage to a stiff, propulsive lever. Central to this transition was the development of the longitudinal arch, a structure that helps store elastic energy and stiffen the foot during bipedal locomotion. Direct evidence for arch evolution, however, has been somewhat elusive given the failure of soft-tissue to fossilize. Paleoanthropologists have relied on footprints and bony correlates of arch development, though little consensus has emerged as to when the arch evolved. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here, we present evidence from radiographs of modern humans (n = 261) that the set of the distal tibia in the sagittal plane, henceforth referred to as the tibial arch angle, is related to rearfoot arching. Non-human primates have a posteriorly directed tibial arch angle, while most humans have an anteriorly directed tibial arch angle. Those humans with a posteriorly directed tibial arch angle (8%) have significantly lower talocalcaneal and talar declination angles, both measures of an asymptomatic flatfoot. Application of these results to the hominin fossil record reveals that a well developed rearfoot arch had evolved in Australopithecus afarensis. However, as in humans today, Australopithecus populations exhibited individual variation in foot morphology and arch development, and “Lucy” (A.L. 288-1), a 3.18 Myr-old female Australopithecus, likely possessed asymptomatic flat feet. Additional distal tibiae from the Plio-Pleistocene show variation in tibial arch angles, including two early Homo tibiae that also have slightly posteriorly directed tibial arch angles. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study finds that the rearfoot arch was present in the genus Australopithecus. However, the female Australopithecus afarensis “Lucy” has an ankle morphology consistent with non-pathological flat-footedness. This study suggests that, as in humans today, there was variation in arch development in Plio-Pleistocene hominins. Public Library of Science 2010-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3010983/ /pubmed/21203433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014432 Text en DeSilva, Throckmorton. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
DeSilva, Jeremy M.
Throckmorton, Zachary J.
Lucy's Flat Feet: The Relationship between the Ankle and Rearfoot Arching in Early Hominins
title Lucy's Flat Feet: The Relationship between the Ankle and Rearfoot Arching in Early Hominins
title_full Lucy's Flat Feet: The Relationship between the Ankle and Rearfoot Arching in Early Hominins
title_fullStr Lucy's Flat Feet: The Relationship between the Ankle and Rearfoot Arching in Early Hominins
title_full_unstemmed Lucy's Flat Feet: The Relationship between the Ankle and Rearfoot Arching in Early Hominins
title_short Lucy's Flat Feet: The Relationship between the Ankle and Rearfoot Arching in Early Hominins
title_sort lucy's flat feet: the relationship between the ankle and rearfoot arching in early hominins
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3010983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21203433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014432
work_keys_str_mv AT desilvajeremym lucysflatfeettherelationshipbetweentheankleandrearfootarchinginearlyhominins
AT throckmortonzacharyj lucysflatfeettherelationshipbetweentheankleandrearfootarchinginearlyhominins