Cargando…

Adaptive auditory risk assessment in the dogbane tiger moth when pursued by bats

Moths and butterflies flying in search of mates risk detection by numerous aerial predators; under the cover of night, the greatest threat will often be from insectivorous bats. During such encounters, the toxic dogbane tiger moth, Cycnia tenera uses the received intensity, duration and emission pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ratcliffe, John M., Fullard, James H., Arthur, Benjamin J., Hoy, Ronald R.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3013417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20719772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1488
_version_ 1782195278858682368
author Ratcliffe, John M.
Fullard, James H.
Arthur, Benjamin J.
Hoy, Ronald R.
author_facet Ratcliffe, John M.
Fullard, James H.
Arthur, Benjamin J.
Hoy, Ronald R.
author_sort Ratcliffe, John M.
collection PubMed
description Moths and butterflies flying in search of mates risk detection by numerous aerial predators; under the cover of night, the greatest threat will often be from insectivorous bats. During such encounters, the toxic dogbane tiger moth, Cycnia tenera uses the received intensity, duration and emission pattern of the bat's echolocation calls to determine when, and how many, defensive ultrasonic clicks to produce in return. These clicks, which constitute an acoustic startle response, act as warning signals against bats in flight. Using an integrated test of stimulus generalization and dishabituation, here we show that C. tenera is able to discriminate between the echolocation calls characteristic of a bat that has only just detected it versus those of a bat actively in pursuit of it. We also show that C. tenera habituates more profoundly to the former stimulus train (‘early attack’) than to the latter (‘late attack’), even though it was initially equally responsive to both stimuli. Matched sensory and behavioural data indicate that reduced responsiveness reflects habituation and is not merely attributable to sensory adaptation or motor fatigue. In search of mates in the face of bats, C. tenera's ability to discriminate between attacking bats representing different levels of risk, and to habituate less so to those most dangerous, should function as an adaptive cost–benefit trade-off mechanism in nature.
format Text
id pubmed-3013417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30134172011-01-13 Adaptive auditory risk assessment in the dogbane tiger moth when pursued by bats Ratcliffe, John M. Fullard, James H. Arthur, Benjamin J. Hoy, Ronald R. Proc Biol Sci Research Articles Moths and butterflies flying in search of mates risk detection by numerous aerial predators; under the cover of night, the greatest threat will often be from insectivorous bats. During such encounters, the toxic dogbane tiger moth, Cycnia tenera uses the received intensity, duration and emission pattern of the bat's echolocation calls to determine when, and how many, defensive ultrasonic clicks to produce in return. These clicks, which constitute an acoustic startle response, act as warning signals against bats in flight. Using an integrated test of stimulus generalization and dishabituation, here we show that C. tenera is able to discriminate between the echolocation calls characteristic of a bat that has only just detected it versus those of a bat actively in pursuit of it. We also show that C. tenera habituates more profoundly to the former stimulus train (‘early attack’) than to the latter (‘late attack’), even though it was initially equally responsive to both stimuli. Matched sensory and behavioural data indicate that reduced responsiveness reflects habituation and is not merely attributable to sensory adaptation or motor fatigue. In search of mates in the face of bats, C. tenera's ability to discriminate between attacking bats representing different levels of risk, and to habituate less so to those most dangerous, should function as an adaptive cost–benefit trade-off mechanism in nature. The Royal Society 2011-02-07 2010-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3013417/ /pubmed/20719772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1488 Text en This journal is © 2010 The Royal Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Ratcliffe, John M.
Fullard, James H.
Arthur, Benjamin J.
Hoy, Ronald R.
Adaptive auditory risk assessment in the dogbane tiger moth when pursued by bats
title Adaptive auditory risk assessment in the dogbane tiger moth when pursued by bats
title_full Adaptive auditory risk assessment in the dogbane tiger moth when pursued by bats
title_fullStr Adaptive auditory risk assessment in the dogbane tiger moth when pursued by bats
title_full_unstemmed Adaptive auditory risk assessment in the dogbane tiger moth when pursued by bats
title_short Adaptive auditory risk assessment in the dogbane tiger moth when pursued by bats
title_sort adaptive auditory risk assessment in the dogbane tiger moth when pursued by bats
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3013417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20719772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1488
work_keys_str_mv AT ratcliffejohnm adaptiveauditoryriskassessmentinthedogbanetigermothwhenpursuedbybats
AT fullardjamesh adaptiveauditoryriskassessmentinthedogbanetigermothwhenpursuedbybats
AT arthurbenjaminj adaptiveauditoryriskassessmentinthedogbanetigermothwhenpursuedbybats
AT hoyronaldr adaptiveauditoryriskassessmentinthedogbanetigermothwhenpursuedbybats