Cargando…

Optimized point dose measurement: An effective tool for QA in intensity-modulated radiotherapy

In some cases of Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) point dose measurement, there exists significant deviation between calculated and measured dose at isocenter, sometimes greater than ±3%. This may be because IMRT fields generate complex profiles at the reference point. The deviation arises du...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Alok, Mukherjee, Gautam, Yadav, Girigesh, Pandey, Vinod, Bhattacharya, Kalyan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21224925
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.37480
_version_ 1782195342047969280
author Kumar, Alok
Mukherjee, Gautam
Yadav, Girigesh
Pandey, Vinod
Bhattacharya, Kalyan
author_facet Kumar, Alok
Mukherjee, Gautam
Yadav, Girigesh
Pandey, Vinod
Bhattacharya, Kalyan
author_sort Kumar, Alok
collection PubMed
description In some cases of Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) point dose measurement, there exists significant deviation between calculated and measured dose at isocenter, sometimes greater than ±3%. This may be because IMRT fields generate complex profiles at the reference point. The deviation arises due to lack of lateral electronic equilibrium for small fields, and other factors such as leakage and scatter contribution. Measurements were done using 0.125-cc ion chamber and Universal IMRT phantom (both from PTW-Freiburg). The aim is to find a suitable point of measurement for the chamber to avoid discrepancy between calculated and measured dose. Various beam profiles were generated in the plane of the chamber for each field by implementing patient plan on the IMRT phantom. The profiles show that for the fields which are showing deviation, the ion chamber lies in the steep-gradient region. To rectify the problem, the TPS (Treatment Planning System) calculated dose is found out at various points in the measurement plane of the chamber at isocenter. The necessary displacement to the chamber, as noted from the TPS, was given to obtain the optimum result. Twenty cases were studied for optimization, whose percentage deviation was more than ±3%. The results were well within tolerance criteria of ±3% after optimization. The mean percentage deviation value for the 20 cases studied, with standard deviation of 2.33 under 95% confidence interval, was found out to be 2.10% ± 1.14. Those cases that have significant variation even after optimization are further studied with film dosimetry.
format Text
id pubmed-3014100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30141002011-01-11 Optimized point dose measurement: An effective tool for QA in intensity-modulated radiotherapy Kumar, Alok Mukherjee, Gautam Yadav, Girigesh Pandey, Vinod Bhattacharya, Kalyan J Med Phys Original Article In some cases of Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) point dose measurement, there exists significant deviation between calculated and measured dose at isocenter, sometimes greater than ±3%. This may be because IMRT fields generate complex profiles at the reference point. The deviation arises due to lack of lateral electronic equilibrium for small fields, and other factors such as leakage and scatter contribution. Measurements were done using 0.125-cc ion chamber and Universal IMRT phantom (both from PTW-Freiburg). The aim is to find a suitable point of measurement for the chamber to avoid discrepancy between calculated and measured dose. Various beam profiles were generated in the plane of the chamber for each field by implementing patient plan on the IMRT phantom. The profiles show that for the fields which are showing deviation, the ion chamber lies in the steep-gradient region. To rectify the problem, the TPS (Treatment Planning System) calculated dose is found out at various points in the measurement plane of the chamber at isocenter. The necessary displacement to the chamber, as noted from the TPS, was given to obtain the optimum result. Twenty cases were studied for optimization, whose percentage deviation was more than ±3%. The results were well within tolerance criteria of ±3% after optimization. The mean percentage deviation value for the 20 cases studied, with standard deviation of 2.33 under 95% confidence interval, was found out to be 2.10% ± 1.14. Those cases that have significant variation even after optimization are further studied with film dosimetry. Medknow Publications 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC3014100/ /pubmed/21224925 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.37480 Text en © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, Alok
Mukherjee, Gautam
Yadav, Girigesh
Pandey, Vinod
Bhattacharya, Kalyan
Optimized point dose measurement: An effective tool for QA in intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title Optimized point dose measurement: An effective tool for QA in intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_full Optimized point dose measurement: An effective tool for QA in intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_fullStr Optimized point dose measurement: An effective tool for QA in intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Optimized point dose measurement: An effective tool for QA in intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_short Optimized point dose measurement: An effective tool for QA in intensity-modulated radiotherapy
title_sort optimized point dose measurement: an effective tool for qa in intensity-modulated radiotherapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21224925
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.37480
work_keys_str_mv AT kumaralok optimizedpointdosemeasurementaneffectivetoolforqainintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT mukherjeegautam optimizedpointdosemeasurementaneffectivetoolforqainintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT yadavgirigesh optimizedpointdosemeasurementaneffectivetoolforqainintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT pandeyvinod optimizedpointdosemeasurementaneffectivetoolforqainintensitymodulatedradiotherapy
AT bhattacharyakalyan optimizedpointdosemeasurementaneffectivetoolforqainintensitymodulatedradiotherapy