Cargando…

Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgical reconstruction is performed with the use of an autogenic, allogenic or synthetic graft. The document issued by the Italian National Guidelines System (SNLG, Sistema Nazionale Linee Guida) at the National Institute of Health aims to guide orthopae...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romanini, Emilio, D’Angelo, Franca, De Masi, Salvatore, Adriani, Ezio, Magaletti, Massimiliano, Lacorte, Eleonora, Laricchiuta, Paola, Sagliocca, Luciano, Morciano, Cristina, Mele, Alfonso
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21181226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-010-0124-9
_version_ 1782195356948234240
author Romanini, Emilio
D’Angelo, Franca
De Masi, Salvatore
Adriani, Ezio
Magaletti, Massimiliano
Lacorte, Eleonora
Laricchiuta, Paola
Sagliocca, Luciano
Morciano, Cristina
Mele, Alfonso
author_facet Romanini, Emilio
D’Angelo, Franca
De Masi, Salvatore
Adriani, Ezio
Magaletti, Massimiliano
Lacorte, Eleonora
Laricchiuta, Paola
Sagliocca, Luciano
Morciano, Cristina
Mele, Alfonso
author_sort Romanini, Emilio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgical reconstruction is performed with the use of an autogenic, allogenic or synthetic graft. The document issued by the Italian National Guidelines System (SNLG, Sistema Nazionale Linee Guida) at the National Institute of Health aims to guide orthopaedic surgeons in selecting the optimal graft for ACL reconstruction using an evidence-based approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A monodisciplinary panel was formed to define a restricted number of clinical questions, develop specific search strategies and critically appraise the literature using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) method. The final draft was shared by the panel and then sent to four external referees to assess its readability and clarity, its clinical relevance and the feasibility of recommendations. RESULTS: Autograft shows moderate superiority compared with allograft, in relation to the relevant outcomes and the quality of selected evidence, after an appropriate risk–benefit assessment. Allograft shows higher failure rate and higher risk of infection. The panel recommends use of autografts; patellar tendon should be the first choice, due to its higher stability, while use of hamstring is indicated for subjects for whom knee pain can represent a particular problem (e.g., some categories of workers). CONCLUSIONS: Autograft shows better performance compared with allograft and no significant heterogeneity in relation to relevant outcomes. The GRADE method allowed collation of all the information needed to draw up the recommendations, and to highlight the core points for discussion.
format Text
id pubmed-3014473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30144732011-02-04 Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Romanini, Emilio D’Angelo, Franca De Masi, Salvatore Adriani, Ezio Magaletti, Massimiliano Lacorte, Eleonora Laricchiuta, Paola Sagliocca, Luciano Morciano, Cristina Mele, Alfonso J Orthop Traumatol Review BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgical reconstruction is performed with the use of an autogenic, allogenic or synthetic graft. The document issued by the Italian National Guidelines System (SNLG, Sistema Nazionale Linee Guida) at the National Institute of Health aims to guide orthopaedic surgeons in selecting the optimal graft for ACL reconstruction using an evidence-based approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A monodisciplinary panel was formed to define a restricted number of clinical questions, develop specific search strategies and critically appraise the literature using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) method. The final draft was shared by the panel and then sent to four external referees to assess its readability and clarity, its clinical relevance and the feasibility of recommendations. RESULTS: Autograft shows moderate superiority compared with allograft, in relation to the relevant outcomes and the quality of selected evidence, after an appropriate risk–benefit assessment. Allograft shows higher failure rate and higher risk of infection. The panel recommends use of autografts; patellar tendon should be the first choice, due to its higher stability, while use of hamstring is indicated for subjects for whom knee pain can represent a particular problem (e.g., some categories of workers). CONCLUSIONS: Autograft shows better performance compared with allograft and no significant heterogeneity in relation to relevant outcomes. The GRADE method allowed collation of all the information needed to draw up the recommendations, and to highlight the core points for discussion. Springer International Publishing 2010-12-23 2010-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3014473/ /pubmed/21181226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-010-0124-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Romanini, Emilio
D’Angelo, Franca
De Masi, Salvatore
Adriani, Ezio
Magaletti, Massimiliano
Lacorte, Eleonora
Laricchiuta, Paola
Sagliocca, Luciano
Morciano, Cristina
Mele, Alfonso
Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_full Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_fullStr Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_short Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_sort graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21181226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-010-0124-9
work_keys_str_mv AT romaniniemilio graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT dangelofranca graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT demasisalvatore graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT adrianiezio graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT magalettimassimiliano graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT lacorteeleonora graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT laricchiutapaola graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT saglioccaluciano graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT morcianocristina graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT melealfonso graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction