Cargando…
Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgical reconstruction is performed with the use of an autogenic, allogenic or synthetic graft. The document issued by the Italian National Guidelines System (SNLG, Sistema Nazionale Linee Guida) at the National Institute of Health aims to guide orthopae...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21181226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-010-0124-9 |
_version_ | 1782195356948234240 |
---|---|
author | Romanini, Emilio D’Angelo, Franca De Masi, Salvatore Adriani, Ezio Magaletti, Massimiliano Lacorte, Eleonora Laricchiuta, Paola Sagliocca, Luciano Morciano, Cristina Mele, Alfonso |
author_facet | Romanini, Emilio D’Angelo, Franca De Masi, Salvatore Adriani, Ezio Magaletti, Massimiliano Lacorte, Eleonora Laricchiuta, Paola Sagliocca, Luciano Morciano, Cristina Mele, Alfonso |
author_sort | Romanini, Emilio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgical reconstruction is performed with the use of an autogenic, allogenic or synthetic graft. The document issued by the Italian National Guidelines System (SNLG, Sistema Nazionale Linee Guida) at the National Institute of Health aims to guide orthopaedic surgeons in selecting the optimal graft for ACL reconstruction using an evidence-based approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A monodisciplinary panel was formed to define a restricted number of clinical questions, develop specific search strategies and critically appraise the literature using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) method. The final draft was shared by the panel and then sent to four external referees to assess its readability and clarity, its clinical relevance and the feasibility of recommendations. RESULTS: Autograft shows moderate superiority compared with allograft, in relation to the relevant outcomes and the quality of selected evidence, after an appropriate risk–benefit assessment. Allograft shows higher failure rate and higher risk of infection. The panel recommends use of autografts; patellar tendon should be the first choice, due to its higher stability, while use of hamstring is indicated for subjects for whom knee pain can represent a particular problem (e.g., some categories of workers). CONCLUSIONS: Autograft shows better performance compared with allograft and no significant heterogeneity in relation to relevant outcomes. The GRADE method allowed collation of all the information needed to draw up the recommendations, and to highlight the core points for discussion. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3014473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30144732011-02-04 Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Romanini, Emilio D’Angelo, Franca De Masi, Salvatore Adriani, Ezio Magaletti, Massimiliano Lacorte, Eleonora Laricchiuta, Paola Sagliocca, Luciano Morciano, Cristina Mele, Alfonso J Orthop Traumatol Review BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgical reconstruction is performed with the use of an autogenic, allogenic or synthetic graft. The document issued by the Italian National Guidelines System (SNLG, Sistema Nazionale Linee Guida) at the National Institute of Health aims to guide orthopaedic surgeons in selecting the optimal graft for ACL reconstruction using an evidence-based approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A monodisciplinary panel was formed to define a restricted number of clinical questions, develop specific search strategies and critically appraise the literature using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) method. The final draft was shared by the panel and then sent to four external referees to assess its readability and clarity, its clinical relevance and the feasibility of recommendations. RESULTS: Autograft shows moderate superiority compared with allograft, in relation to the relevant outcomes and the quality of selected evidence, after an appropriate risk–benefit assessment. Allograft shows higher failure rate and higher risk of infection. The panel recommends use of autografts; patellar tendon should be the first choice, due to its higher stability, while use of hamstring is indicated for subjects for whom knee pain can represent a particular problem (e.g., some categories of workers). CONCLUSIONS: Autograft shows better performance compared with allograft and no significant heterogeneity in relation to relevant outcomes. The GRADE method allowed collation of all the information needed to draw up the recommendations, and to highlight the core points for discussion. Springer International Publishing 2010-12-23 2010-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3014473/ /pubmed/21181226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-010-0124-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Romanini, Emilio D’Angelo, Franca De Masi, Salvatore Adriani, Ezio Magaletti, Massimiliano Lacorte, Eleonora Laricchiuta, Paola Sagliocca, Luciano Morciano, Cristina Mele, Alfonso Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
title | Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
title_full | Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
title_short | Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
title_sort | graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21181226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-010-0124-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT romaniniemilio graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT dangelofranca graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT demasisalvatore graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT adrianiezio graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT magalettimassimiliano graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT lacorteeleonora graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT laricchiutapaola graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT saglioccaluciano graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT morcianocristina graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT melealfonso graftselectioninarthroscopicanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction |