Cargando…
Visual Detection Under Uncertainty Operates Via an Early Static, Not Late Dynamic, Non-Linearity
Signals in the environment are rarely specified exactly: our visual system may know what to look for (e.g., a specific face), but not its exact configuration (e.g., where in the room, or in what orientation). Uncertainty, and the ability to deal with it, is a fundamental aspect of visual processing....
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21212835 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2010.00151 |
_version_ | 1782195361830404096 |
---|---|
author | Neri, Peter |
author_facet | Neri, Peter |
author_sort | Neri, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Signals in the environment are rarely specified exactly: our visual system may know what to look for (e.g., a specific face), but not its exact configuration (e.g., where in the room, or in what orientation). Uncertainty, and the ability to deal with it, is a fundamental aspect of visual processing. The MAX model is the current gold standard for describing how human vision handles uncertainty: of all possible configurations for the signal, the observer chooses the one corresponding to the template associated with the largest response. We propose an alternative model in which the MAX operation, which is a dynamic non-linearity (depends on multiple inputs from several stimulus locations) and happens after the input stimulus has been matched to the possible templates, is replaced by an early static non-linearity (depends only on one input corresponding to one stimulus location) which is applied before template matching. By exploiting an integrated set of analytical and experimental tools, we show that this model is able to account for a number of empirical observations otherwise unaccounted for by the MAX model, and is more robust with respect to the realistic limitations imposed by the available neural hardware. We then discuss how these results, currently restricted to a simple visual detection task, may extend to a wider range of problems in sensory processing. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3014650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30146502011-01-06 Visual Detection Under Uncertainty Operates Via an Early Static, Not Late Dynamic, Non-Linearity Neri, Peter Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience Signals in the environment are rarely specified exactly: our visual system may know what to look for (e.g., a specific face), but not its exact configuration (e.g., where in the room, or in what orientation). Uncertainty, and the ability to deal with it, is a fundamental aspect of visual processing. The MAX model is the current gold standard for describing how human vision handles uncertainty: of all possible configurations for the signal, the observer chooses the one corresponding to the template associated with the largest response. We propose an alternative model in which the MAX operation, which is a dynamic non-linearity (depends on multiple inputs from several stimulus locations) and happens after the input stimulus has been matched to the possible templates, is replaced by an early static non-linearity (depends only on one input corresponding to one stimulus location) which is applied before template matching. By exploiting an integrated set of analytical and experimental tools, we show that this model is able to account for a number of empirical observations otherwise unaccounted for by the MAX model, and is more robust with respect to the realistic limitations imposed by the available neural hardware. We then discuss how these results, currently restricted to a simple visual detection task, may extend to a wider range of problems in sensory processing. Frontiers Research Foundation 2010-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3014650/ /pubmed/21212835 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2010.00151 Text en Copyright © 2010 Neri. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Neri, Peter Visual Detection Under Uncertainty Operates Via an Early Static, Not Late Dynamic, Non-Linearity |
title | Visual Detection Under Uncertainty Operates Via an Early Static, Not Late Dynamic, Non-Linearity |
title_full | Visual Detection Under Uncertainty Operates Via an Early Static, Not Late Dynamic, Non-Linearity |
title_fullStr | Visual Detection Under Uncertainty Operates Via an Early Static, Not Late Dynamic, Non-Linearity |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual Detection Under Uncertainty Operates Via an Early Static, Not Late Dynamic, Non-Linearity |
title_short | Visual Detection Under Uncertainty Operates Via an Early Static, Not Late Dynamic, Non-Linearity |
title_sort | visual detection under uncertainty operates via an early static, not late dynamic, non-linearity |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21212835 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2010.00151 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neripeter visualdetectionunderuncertaintyoperatesviaanearlystaticnotlatedynamicnonlinearity |