Cargando…

Comparative Quality of Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy in the Elderly Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis

The safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients ≥65 years of age requires further investigation of postoperative outcomes before it becomes more widely accepted as a safe technique. The advantages of using LC versus open cholecystectomy (OC) in elderly patients were analyzed using propen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuwabara, Kazuaki, Matsuda, Shinya, Ishikawa, Koichi Benjamin, Horiguchi, Hiromasa, Fujimori, Kenji
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21234395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/490147
_version_ 1782195370489544704
author Kuwabara, Kazuaki
Matsuda, Shinya
Ishikawa, Koichi Benjamin
Horiguchi, Hiromasa
Fujimori, Kenji
author_facet Kuwabara, Kazuaki
Matsuda, Shinya
Ishikawa, Koichi Benjamin
Horiguchi, Hiromasa
Fujimori, Kenji
author_sort Kuwabara, Kazuaki
collection PubMed
description The safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients ≥65 years of age requires further investigation of postoperative outcomes before it becomes more widely accepted as a safe technique. The advantages of using LC versus open cholecystectomy (OC) in elderly patients were analyzed using propensity score matching. The demographics, cholecystitis severity, comorbidities, complications, and admission and discharge Barthel Index (BI) scores of patients with benign gallbladder diseases were analyzed. Outcomes were analyzed by age, length of stay (LOS), total charges (TCs), BI improvement, and postoperative complications. OC, which was indicated in severe disease cases, increased hospital resource use and caused more complications than LC, but did not improve BI. Advanced age and OC resulted in greater LOS and TCs and was the best indicator of BI deterioration. Whenever possible, surgeons should use LC in elderly patients to minimize postoperative complications and allow them to regain a good quality of life.
format Text
id pubmed-3014686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30146862011-01-13 Comparative Quality of Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy in the Elderly Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis Kuwabara, Kazuaki Matsuda, Shinya Ishikawa, Koichi Benjamin Horiguchi, Hiromasa Fujimori, Kenji Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article The safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients ≥65 years of age requires further investigation of postoperative outcomes before it becomes more widely accepted as a safe technique. The advantages of using LC versus open cholecystectomy (OC) in elderly patients were analyzed using propensity score matching. The demographics, cholecystitis severity, comorbidities, complications, and admission and discharge Barthel Index (BI) scores of patients with benign gallbladder diseases were analyzed. Outcomes were analyzed by age, length of stay (LOS), total charges (TCs), BI improvement, and postoperative complications. OC, which was indicated in severe disease cases, increased hospital resource use and caused more complications than LC, but did not improve BI. Advanced age and OC resulted in greater LOS and TCs and was the best indicator of BI deterioration. Whenever possible, surgeons should use LC in elderly patients to minimize postoperative complications and allow them to regain a good quality of life. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2010 2010-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3014686/ /pubmed/21234395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/490147 Text en Copyright © 2010 Kazuaki Kuwabara et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kuwabara, Kazuaki
Matsuda, Shinya
Ishikawa, Koichi Benjamin
Horiguchi, Hiromasa
Fujimori, Kenji
Comparative Quality of Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy in the Elderly Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title Comparative Quality of Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy in the Elderly Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_full Comparative Quality of Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy in the Elderly Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_fullStr Comparative Quality of Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy in the Elderly Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Quality of Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy in the Elderly Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_short Comparative Quality of Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy in the Elderly Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_sort comparative quality of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in the elderly using propensity score matching analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21234395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/490147
work_keys_str_mv AT kuwabarakazuaki comparativequalityoflaparoscopicandopencholecystectomyintheelderlyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT matsudashinya comparativequalityoflaparoscopicandopencholecystectomyintheelderlyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT ishikawakoichibenjamin comparativequalityoflaparoscopicandopencholecystectomyintheelderlyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT horiguchihiromasa comparativequalityoflaparoscopicandopencholecystectomyintheelderlyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT fujimorikenji comparativequalityoflaparoscopicandopencholecystectomyintheelderlyusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis