Cargando…

Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the role of primary repair and to investigate the possibility of expanding indications for primary repair of colon injuries using nonselective approach. METHODS: Two groups of patients were analyzed. Retrospective (RS) group included 30 patients manag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lazovic, Ranko G, Barisic, Goran I, Krivokapic, Zoran V
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21126337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-141
_version_ 1782195411292782592
author Lazovic, Ranko G
Barisic, Goran I
Krivokapic, Zoran V
author_facet Lazovic, Ranko G
Barisic, Goran I
Krivokapic, Zoran V
author_sort Lazovic, Ranko G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the role of primary repair and to investigate the possibility of expanding indications for primary repair of colon injuries using nonselective approach. METHODS: Two groups of patients were analyzed. Retrospective (RS) group included 30 patients managed by primary repair or two stage surgical procedure according to criteria published by Stone (S/F) and Flint (Fl). In this group 18 patients were managed by primary repair. Prospective (PR) group included 33 patients with primary repair as a first choice procedure. In this group, primary repair was performed in 30 cases. RESULTS: Groups were comparable regarding age, sex, and indexes of trauma severity. Time between injury and surgery was shorter in PR group, (1.3 vs. 3.1 hours). Stab wounds were more frequent in PR group (9:2), and iatrogenic lesions in RS group (6:2). Associated injuries were similar, as well as segmental distribution of colon injuries. S/F criteria and Flint grading were similar. In RS group 15 primary repairs were successful, while in two cases relaparotomy and colostomy was performed due to anastomotic leakage. One patient died. In PR group, 25 primary repairs were successful, with 2 immediate and 3 postoperative (7-10 days) deaths, with no evidence of anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study justify more liberal use of primary repair in early management of colon injuries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN94682396
format Text
id pubmed-3014882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30148822011-01-05 Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach Lazovic, Ranko G Barisic, Goran I Krivokapic, Zoran V BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the role of primary repair and to investigate the possibility of expanding indications for primary repair of colon injuries using nonselective approach. METHODS: Two groups of patients were analyzed. Retrospective (RS) group included 30 patients managed by primary repair or two stage surgical procedure according to criteria published by Stone (S/F) and Flint (Fl). In this group 18 patients were managed by primary repair. Prospective (PR) group included 33 patients with primary repair as a first choice procedure. In this group, primary repair was performed in 30 cases. RESULTS: Groups were comparable regarding age, sex, and indexes of trauma severity. Time between injury and surgery was shorter in PR group, (1.3 vs. 3.1 hours). Stab wounds were more frequent in PR group (9:2), and iatrogenic lesions in RS group (6:2). Associated injuries were similar, as well as segmental distribution of colon injuries. S/F criteria and Flint grading were similar. In RS group 15 primary repairs were successful, while in two cases relaparotomy and colostomy was performed due to anastomotic leakage. One patient died. In PR group, 25 primary repairs were successful, with 2 immediate and 3 postoperative (7-10 days) deaths, with no evidence of anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study justify more liberal use of primary repair in early management of colon injuries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN94682396 BioMed Central 2010-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3014882/ /pubmed/21126337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-141 Text en Copyright ©2010 Lazovic et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lazovic, Ranko G
Barisic, Goran I
Krivokapic, Zoran V
Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach
title Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach
title_full Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach
title_fullStr Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach
title_full_unstemmed Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach
title_short Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach
title_sort primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21126337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-141
work_keys_str_mv AT lazovicrankog primaryrepairofcoloninjuriesclinicalstudyofnonselectiveapproach
AT barisicgorani primaryrepairofcoloninjuriesclinicalstudyofnonselectiveapproach
AT krivokapiczoranv primaryrepairofcoloninjuriesclinicalstudyofnonselectiveapproach