Cargando…
Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the role of primary repair and to investigate the possibility of expanding indications for primary repair of colon injuries using nonselective approach. METHODS: Two groups of patients were analyzed. Retrospective (RS) group included 30 patients manag...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21126337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-141 |
_version_ | 1782195411292782592 |
---|---|
author | Lazovic, Ranko G Barisic, Goran I Krivokapic, Zoran V |
author_facet | Lazovic, Ranko G Barisic, Goran I Krivokapic, Zoran V |
author_sort | Lazovic, Ranko G |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the role of primary repair and to investigate the possibility of expanding indications for primary repair of colon injuries using nonselective approach. METHODS: Two groups of patients were analyzed. Retrospective (RS) group included 30 patients managed by primary repair or two stage surgical procedure according to criteria published by Stone (S/F) and Flint (Fl). In this group 18 patients were managed by primary repair. Prospective (PR) group included 33 patients with primary repair as a first choice procedure. In this group, primary repair was performed in 30 cases. RESULTS: Groups were comparable regarding age, sex, and indexes of trauma severity. Time between injury and surgery was shorter in PR group, (1.3 vs. 3.1 hours). Stab wounds were more frequent in PR group (9:2), and iatrogenic lesions in RS group (6:2). Associated injuries were similar, as well as segmental distribution of colon injuries. S/F criteria and Flint grading were similar. In RS group 15 primary repairs were successful, while in two cases relaparotomy and colostomy was performed due to anastomotic leakage. One patient died. In PR group, 25 primary repairs were successful, with 2 immediate and 3 postoperative (7-10 days) deaths, with no evidence of anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study justify more liberal use of primary repair in early management of colon injuries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN94682396 |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3014882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30148822011-01-05 Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach Lazovic, Ranko G Barisic, Goran I Krivokapic, Zoran V BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the role of primary repair and to investigate the possibility of expanding indications for primary repair of colon injuries using nonselective approach. METHODS: Two groups of patients were analyzed. Retrospective (RS) group included 30 patients managed by primary repair or two stage surgical procedure according to criteria published by Stone (S/F) and Flint (Fl). In this group 18 patients were managed by primary repair. Prospective (PR) group included 33 patients with primary repair as a first choice procedure. In this group, primary repair was performed in 30 cases. RESULTS: Groups were comparable regarding age, sex, and indexes of trauma severity. Time between injury and surgery was shorter in PR group, (1.3 vs. 3.1 hours). Stab wounds were more frequent in PR group (9:2), and iatrogenic lesions in RS group (6:2). Associated injuries were similar, as well as segmental distribution of colon injuries. S/F criteria and Flint grading were similar. In RS group 15 primary repairs were successful, while in two cases relaparotomy and colostomy was performed due to anastomotic leakage. One patient died. In PR group, 25 primary repairs were successful, with 2 immediate and 3 postoperative (7-10 days) deaths, with no evidence of anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study justify more liberal use of primary repair in early management of colon injuries. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN94682396 BioMed Central 2010-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3014882/ /pubmed/21126337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-141 Text en Copyright ©2010 Lazovic et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lazovic, Ranko G Barisic, Goran I Krivokapic, Zoran V Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach |
title | Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach |
title_full | Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach |
title_fullStr | Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach |
title_short | Primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach |
title_sort | primary repair of colon injuries: clinical study of nonselective approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21126337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-10-141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lazovicrankog primaryrepairofcoloninjuriesclinicalstudyofnonselectiveapproach AT barisicgorani primaryrepairofcoloninjuriesclinicalstudyofnonselectiveapproach AT krivokapiczoranv primaryrepairofcoloninjuriesclinicalstudyofnonselectiveapproach |