Cargando…

Sequence Alignment, Mutual Information, and Dissimilarity Measures for Constructing Phylogenies

BACKGROUND: Existing sequence alignment algorithms use heuristic scoring schemes based on biological expertise, which cannot be used as objective distance metrics. As a result one relies on crude measures, like the p- or log-det distances, or makes explicit, and often too simplistic, a priori assump...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penner, Orion, Grassberger, Peter, Paczuski, Maya
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21245917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014373
_version_ 1782195431236698112
author Penner, Orion
Grassberger, Peter
Paczuski, Maya
author_facet Penner, Orion
Grassberger, Peter
Paczuski, Maya
author_sort Penner, Orion
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Existing sequence alignment algorithms use heuristic scoring schemes based on biological expertise, which cannot be used as objective distance metrics. As a result one relies on crude measures, like the p- or log-det distances, or makes explicit, and often too simplistic, a priori assumptions about sequence evolution. Information theory provides an alternative, in the form of mutual information (MI). MI is, in principle, an objective and model independent similarity measure, but it is not widely used in this context and no algorithm for extracting MI from a given alignment (without assuming an evolutionary model) is known. MI can be estimated without alignments, by concatenating and zipping sequences, but so far this has only produced estimates with uncontrolled errors, despite the fact that the normalized compression distance based on it has shown promising results. RESULTS: We describe a simple approach to get robust estimates of MI from global pairwise alignments. Our main result uses algorithmic (Kolmogorov) information theory, but we show that similar results can also be obtained from Shannon theory. For animal mitochondrial DNA our approach uses the alignments made by popular global alignment algorithms to produce MI estimates that are strikingly close to estimates obtained from the alignment free methods mentioned above. We point out that, due to the fact that it is not additive, normalized compression distance is not an optimal metric for phylogenetics but we propose a simple modification that overcomes the issue of additivity. We test several versions of our MI based distance measures on a large number of randomly chosen quartets and demonstrate that they all perform better than traditional measures like the Kimura or log-det (resp. paralinear) distances. CONCLUSIONS: Several versions of MI based distances outperform conventional distances in distance-based phylogeny. Even a simplified version based on single letter Shannon entropies, which can be easily incorporated in existing software packages, gave superior results throughout the entire animal kingdom. But we see the main virtue of our approach in a more general way. For example, it can also help to judge the relative merits of different alignment algorithms, by estimating the significance of specific alignments. It strongly suggests that information theory concepts can be exploited further in sequence analysis.
format Text
id pubmed-3014950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30149502011-01-18 Sequence Alignment, Mutual Information, and Dissimilarity Measures for Constructing Phylogenies Penner, Orion Grassberger, Peter Paczuski, Maya PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Existing sequence alignment algorithms use heuristic scoring schemes based on biological expertise, which cannot be used as objective distance metrics. As a result one relies on crude measures, like the p- or log-det distances, or makes explicit, and often too simplistic, a priori assumptions about sequence evolution. Information theory provides an alternative, in the form of mutual information (MI). MI is, in principle, an objective and model independent similarity measure, but it is not widely used in this context and no algorithm for extracting MI from a given alignment (without assuming an evolutionary model) is known. MI can be estimated without alignments, by concatenating and zipping sequences, but so far this has only produced estimates with uncontrolled errors, despite the fact that the normalized compression distance based on it has shown promising results. RESULTS: We describe a simple approach to get robust estimates of MI from global pairwise alignments. Our main result uses algorithmic (Kolmogorov) information theory, but we show that similar results can also be obtained from Shannon theory. For animal mitochondrial DNA our approach uses the alignments made by popular global alignment algorithms to produce MI estimates that are strikingly close to estimates obtained from the alignment free methods mentioned above. We point out that, due to the fact that it is not additive, normalized compression distance is not an optimal metric for phylogenetics but we propose a simple modification that overcomes the issue of additivity. We test several versions of our MI based distance measures on a large number of randomly chosen quartets and demonstrate that they all perform better than traditional measures like the Kimura or log-det (resp. paralinear) distances. CONCLUSIONS: Several versions of MI based distances outperform conventional distances in distance-based phylogeny. Even a simplified version based on single letter Shannon entropies, which can be easily incorporated in existing software packages, gave superior results throughout the entire animal kingdom. But we see the main virtue of our approach in a more general way. For example, it can also help to judge the relative merits of different alignment algorithms, by estimating the significance of specific alignments. It strongly suggests that information theory concepts can be exploited further in sequence analysis. Public Library of Science 2011-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3014950/ /pubmed/21245917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014373 Text en Penner et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Penner, Orion
Grassberger, Peter
Paczuski, Maya
Sequence Alignment, Mutual Information, and Dissimilarity Measures for Constructing Phylogenies
title Sequence Alignment, Mutual Information, and Dissimilarity Measures for Constructing Phylogenies
title_full Sequence Alignment, Mutual Information, and Dissimilarity Measures for Constructing Phylogenies
title_fullStr Sequence Alignment, Mutual Information, and Dissimilarity Measures for Constructing Phylogenies
title_full_unstemmed Sequence Alignment, Mutual Information, and Dissimilarity Measures for Constructing Phylogenies
title_short Sequence Alignment, Mutual Information, and Dissimilarity Measures for Constructing Phylogenies
title_sort sequence alignment, mutual information, and dissimilarity measures for constructing phylogenies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21245917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014373
work_keys_str_mv AT pennerorion sequencealignmentmutualinformationanddissimilaritymeasuresforconstructingphylogenies
AT grassbergerpeter sequencealignmentmutualinformationanddissimilaritymeasuresforconstructingphylogenies
AT paczuskimaya sequencealignmentmutualinformationanddissimilaritymeasuresforconstructingphylogenies