Cargando…

Activities of Rifampin, Rifapentine and Clarithromycin Alone and in Combination against Mycobacterium ulcerans Disease in Mice

BACKGROUND: Treatment of Mycobacterium ulcerans disease, or Buruli ulcer (BU), has shifted from surgery to treatment with streptomycin(STR)+rifampin(RIF) since 2004 based on studies in a mouse model and clinical trials. We tested two entirely oral regimens for BU treatment, rifampin(RIF)+clarithromy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almeida, Deepak, Converse, Paul J., Ahmad, Zahoor, Dooley, Kelly E., Nuermberger, Eric L., Grosset, Jacques H.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21245920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000933
_version_ 1782195438662713344
author Almeida, Deepak
Converse, Paul J.
Ahmad, Zahoor
Dooley, Kelly E.
Nuermberger, Eric L.
Grosset, Jacques H.
author_facet Almeida, Deepak
Converse, Paul J.
Ahmad, Zahoor
Dooley, Kelly E.
Nuermberger, Eric L.
Grosset, Jacques H.
author_sort Almeida, Deepak
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment of Mycobacterium ulcerans disease, or Buruli ulcer (BU), has shifted from surgery to treatment with streptomycin(STR)+rifampin(RIF) since 2004 based on studies in a mouse model and clinical trials. We tested two entirely oral regimens for BU treatment, rifampin(RIF)+clarithromycin(CLR) and rifapentine(RPT)+clarithromycin(CLR) in the mouse model. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: BALB/c mice were infected in the right hind footpad with M. ulcerans strain 1059 and treated daily (5 days/week) for 4 weeks, beginning 11 days after infection. Treatment groups included an untreated control, STR+RIF as a positive control, and test regimens of RIF, RPT, STR and CLR given alone and the RIF+CLR and RPT+CLR combinations. The relative efficacy of the drug treatments was compared on the basis of footpad CFU counts and median time to footpad swelling. Except for CLR, which was bacteriostatic, treatment with all other drugs reduced CFU counts by approximately 2 or 3 log(10). Median time to footpad swelling after infection was 5.5, 16, 17, 23.5 and 36.5 weeks in mice receiving no treatment, CLR alone, RIF+CLR, RIF alone, and STR alone, respectively. At the end of follow-up, 39 weeks after infection, only 48%, 26.4% and 16.3% of mice treated with RPT+CLR, RPT alone and STR+RIF had developed swollen footpads. An in vitro checkerboard assay showed the interaction of CLR and RIF to be indifferent. However, in mice, co-administration with CLR resulted in a roughly 25% decrease in the maximal serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) of each rifamycin. Delaying the administration of CLR by one hour restored Cmax and AUC values of RIF to levels obtained with RIF alone. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that an entirely oral daily regimen of RPT+CLR may be at least as effective as the currently recommended combination of injected STR+oral RIF.
format Text
id pubmed-3014976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30149762011-01-18 Activities of Rifampin, Rifapentine and Clarithromycin Alone and in Combination against Mycobacterium ulcerans Disease in Mice Almeida, Deepak Converse, Paul J. Ahmad, Zahoor Dooley, Kelly E. Nuermberger, Eric L. Grosset, Jacques H. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Treatment of Mycobacterium ulcerans disease, or Buruli ulcer (BU), has shifted from surgery to treatment with streptomycin(STR)+rifampin(RIF) since 2004 based on studies in a mouse model and clinical trials. We tested two entirely oral regimens for BU treatment, rifampin(RIF)+clarithromycin(CLR) and rifapentine(RPT)+clarithromycin(CLR) in the mouse model. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: BALB/c mice were infected in the right hind footpad with M. ulcerans strain 1059 and treated daily (5 days/week) for 4 weeks, beginning 11 days after infection. Treatment groups included an untreated control, STR+RIF as a positive control, and test regimens of RIF, RPT, STR and CLR given alone and the RIF+CLR and RPT+CLR combinations. The relative efficacy of the drug treatments was compared on the basis of footpad CFU counts and median time to footpad swelling. Except for CLR, which was bacteriostatic, treatment with all other drugs reduced CFU counts by approximately 2 or 3 log(10). Median time to footpad swelling after infection was 5.5, 16, 17, 23.5 and 36.5 weeks in mice receiving no treatment, CLR alone, RIF+CLR, RIF alone, and STR alone, respectively. At the end of follow-up, 39 weeks after infection, only 48%, 26.4% and 16.3% of mice treated with RPT+CLR, RPT alone and STR+RIF had developed swollen footpads. An in vitro checkerboard assay showed the interaction of CLR and RIF to be indifferent. However, in mice, co-administration with CLR resulted in a roughly 25% decrease in the maximal serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) of each rifamycin. Delaying the administration of CLR by one hour restored Cmax and AUC values of RIF to levels obtained with RIF alone. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that an entirely oral daily regimen of RPT+CLR may be at least as effective as the currently recommended combination of injected STR+oral RIF. Public Library of Science 2011-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3014976/ /pubmed/21245920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000933 Text en Almeida et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Almeida, Deepak
Converse, Paul J.
Ahmad, Zahoor
Dooley, Kelly E.
Nuermberger, Eric L.
Grosset, Jacques H.
Activities of Rifampin, Rifapentine and Clarithromycin Alone and in Combination against Mycobacterium ulcerans Disease in Mice
title Activities of Rifampin, Rifapentine and Clarithromycin Alone and in Combination against Mycobacterium ulcerans Disease in Mice
title_full Activities of Rifampin, Rifapentine and Clarithromycin Alone and in Combination against Mycobacterium ulcerans Disease in Mice
title_fullStr Activities of Rifampin, Rifapentine and Clarithromycin Alone and in Combination against Mycobacterium ulcerans Disease in Mice
title_full_unstemmed Activities of Rifampin, Rifapentine and Clarithromycin Alone and in Combination against Mycobacterium ulcerans Disease in Mice
title_short Activities of Rifampin, Rifapentine and Clarithromycin Alone and in Combination against Mycobacterium ulcerans Disease in Mice
title_sort activities of rifampin, rifapentine and clarithromycin alone and in combination against mycobacterium ulcerans disease in mice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3014976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21245920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000933
work_keys_str_mv AT almeidadeepak activitiesofrifampinrifapentineandclarithromycinaloneandincombinationagainstmycobacteriumulceransdiseaseinmice
AT conversepaulj activitiesofrifampinrifapentineandclarithromycinaloneandincombinationagainstmycobacteriumulceransdiseaseinmice
AT ahmadzahoor activitiesofrifampinrifapentineandclarithromycinaloneandincombinationagainstmycobacteriumulceransdiseaseinmice
AT dooleykellye activitiesofrifampinrifapentineandclarithromycinaloneandincombinationagainstmycobacteriumulceransdiseaseinmice
AT nuermbergerericl activitiesofrifampinrifapentineandclarithromycinaloneandincombinationagainstmycobacteriumulceransdiseaseinmice
AT grossetjacquesh activitiesofrifampinrifapentineandclarithromycinaloneandincombinationagainstmycobacteriumulceransdiseaseinmice