Cargando…

Enhanced recovery program in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer

INTRODUCTION: Both laparoscopic colectomy and application of enhanced recovery program (ERP) in open colectomy have been demonstrated to enable early recovery and to shorten hospital stay. This study evaluated the impact of ERP on results of laparoscopic colectomy and comparison was made with the ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poon, Jensen T. C., Fan, Joe K. M., Lo, Oswens S. H., Law, Wai Lun
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20938667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1059-6
_version_ 1782195454632525824
author Poon, Jensen T. C.
Fan, Joe K. M.
Lo, Oswens S. H.
Law, Wai Lun
author_facet Poon, Jensen T. C.
Fan, Joe K. M.
Lo, Oswens S. H.
Law, Wai Lun
author_sort Poon, Jensen T. C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Both laparoscopic colectomy and application of enhanced recovery program (ERP) in open colectomy have been demonstrated to enable early recovery and to shorten hospital stay. This study evaluated the impact of ERP on results of laparoscopic colectomy and comparison was made with the outcomes of patients prior to the application of ERP. METHODS: An ERP was implemented in the authors’ center in December 2006. Short-term outcomes of consecutive 84 patients who underwent laparoscopic colonic cancer resection 23 months before (control group) and 96 patients who were operated within 13 months; after application of ERP (ERP group) were compared. RESULTS: Between the ERP and control groups, there was no statistical difference in patient characteristics, pathology, operating time, blood loss, conversion rate or complications. Compared to the control group, patients in the ERP group had earlier passage of flatus [2 (range: 1–5) versus 2 (range: 1–4) days after operation respectively; p = 0.03)] and a lower incidence of prolonged post-operative ileus (6% versus 0 respectively; p = 0.02). There was no difference in the hospital stay between the two groups [4 (range: 2–34) days in control group and 4 (range: 2–23) days in ERP group; p = 0.4)]. The re-admission rate was also similar (7% in control group and 5% in ERP group; p = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: In laparoscopic colectomy for cancer, application of ERP was associated with no increase in complication rate but significant improvement of gastrointestinal function. ERP further hastened patient recovery but resulted in no difference in hospital stay.
format Text
id pubmed-3015174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30151742011-02-04 Enhanced recovery program in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer Poon, Jensen T. C. Fan, Joe K. M. Lo, Oswens S. H. Law, Wai Lun Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article INTRODUCTION: Both laparoscopic colectomy and application of enhanced recovery program (ERP) in open colectomy have been demonstrated to enable early recovery and to shorten hospital stay. This study evaluated the impact of ERP on results of laparoscopic colectomy and comparison was made with the outcomes of patients prior to the application of ERP. METHODS: An ERP was implemented in the authors’ center in December 2006. Short-term outcomes of consecutive 84 patients who underwent laparoscopic colonic cancer resection 23 months before (control group) and 96 patients who were operated within 13 months; after application of ERP (ERP group) were compared. RESULTS: Between the ERP and control groups, there was no statistical difference in patient characteristics, pathology, operating time, blood loss, conversion rate or complications. Compared to the control group, patients in the ERP group had earlier passage of flatus [2 (range: 1–5) versus 2 (range: 1–4) days after operation respectively; p = 0.03)] and a lower incidence of prolonged post-operative ileus (6% versus 0 respectively; p = 0.02). There was no difference in the hospital stay between the two groups [4 (range: 2–34) days in control group and 4 (range: 2–23) days in ERP group; p = 0.4)]. The re-admission rate was also similar (7% in control group and 5% in ERP group; p = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: In laparoscopic colectomy for cancer, application of ERP was associated with no increase in complication rate but significant improvement of gastrointestinal function. ERP further hastened patient recovery but resulted in no difference in hospital stay. Springer-Verlag 2010-10-12 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3015174/ /pubmed/20938667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1059-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Poon, Jensen T. C.
Fan, Joe K. M.
Lo, Oswens S. H.
Law, Wai Lun
Enhanced recovery program in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer
title Enhanced recovery program in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer
title_full Enhanced recovery program in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer
title_fullStr Enhanced recovery program in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced recovery program in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer
title_short Enhanced recovery program in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer
title_sort enhanced recovery program in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20938667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1059-6
work_keys_str_mv AT poonjensentc enhancedrecoveryprograminlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancer
AT fanjoekm enhancedrecoveryprograminlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancer
AT looswenssh enhancedrecoveryprograminlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancer
AT lawwailun enhancedrecoveryprograminlaparoscopiccolectomyforcancer