Cargando…

Office Single Puncture Laparoscopy Sterilization with Local Anesthesia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently there has been a renewed interest in office based laparoscopy sterilization utilizing local anesthesia with conscious intravenous sedation. The safety of performing the procedure outside of a hospital environment has been questioned. The author attempts to determi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Miller, George H.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9876648
_version_ 1782195465178054656
author Miller, George H.
author_facet Miller, George H.
author_sort Miller, George H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently there has been a renewed interest in office based laparoscopy sterilization utilizing local anesthesia with conscious intravenous sedation. The safety of performing the procedure outside of a hospital environment has been questioned. The author attempts to determine the incidence of major complications with a review of the literature and a retrospective chart review of his personal cases. METHODS: During the period from 1971 to 1995, the author performed 1,753 laparoscopic procedures, utilizing local anesthesia in 1,562 cases and general anesthesia in the remainder. The focus of this chart study is the 1,190 laparoscopy sterilization cases performed in an office exam room setting, utilizing local anesthesia and conscious intravenous analgesia. Conventional 10 mm single puncture laparoscopy equipment was used. Major complications were defined as requiring laparotomy, blood transfusion, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or emergency transfer to the hospital. RESULTS: The author's series contained one major complication, which was easily handled in the office environment. A review of the literature, including the author's series, revealed a major complication incidence of 5 out of 20,568 cases reviewed. None of these five complications would have required immediate laparotomy or blood transfusion to prevent a fatality. CONCLUSION: The author proposes that there is no documented evidence that office laparoscopy places the patient at increased risk for a life-threatening complication and should be considered by experienced gynecologic laparoscopists who are interested in cost containment.
format Text
id pubmed-3015231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1997
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30152312011-02-17 Office Single Puncture Laparoscopy Sterilization with Local Anesthesia Miller, George H. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently there has been a renewed interest in office based laparoscopy sterilization utilizing local anesthesia with conscious intravenous sedation. The safety of performing the procedure outside of a hospital environment has been questioned. The author attempts to determine the incidence of major complications with a review of the literature and a retrospective chart review of his personal cases. METHODS: During the period from 1971 to 1995, the author performed 1,753 laparoscopic procedures, utilizing local anesthesia in 1,562 cases and general anesthesia in the remainder. The focus of this chart study is the 1,190 laparoscopy sterilization cases performed in an office exam room setting, utilizing local anesthesia and conscious intravenous analgesia. Conventional 10 mm single puncture laparoscopy equipment was used. Major complications were defined as requiring laparotomy, blood transfusion, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or emergency transfer to the hospital. RESULTS: The author's series contained one major complication, which was easily handled in the office environment. A review of the literature, including the author's series, revealed a major complication incidence of 5 out of 20,568 cases reviewed. None of these five complications would have required immediate laparotomy or blood transfusion to prevent a fatality. CONCLUSION: The author proposes that there is no documented evidence that office laparoscopy places the patient at increased risk for a life-threatening complication and should be considered by experienced gynecologic laparoscopists who are interested in cost containment. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 1997 /pmc/articles/PMC3015231/ /pubmed/9876648 Text en © 1997 by the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Miller, George H.
Office Single Puncture Laparoscopy Sterilization with Local Anesthesia
title Office Single Puncture Laparoscopy Sterilization with Local Anesthesia
title_full Office Single Puncture Laparoscopy Sterilization with Local Anesthesia
title_fullStr Office Single Puncture Laparoscopy Sterilization with Local Anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Office Single Puncture Laparoscopy Sterilization with Local Anesthesia
title_short Office Single Puncture Laparoscopy Sterilization with Local Anesthesia
title_sort office single puncture laparoscopy sterilization with local anesthesia
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9876648
work_keys_str_mv AT millergeorgeh officesinglepuncturelaparoscopysterilizationwithlocalanesthesia