Cargando…

Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Minilaparoscopic Approach: A Retrospective Review After 8-Years' Experience

BACKGROUND: This is a presentation of our 8-year experience in laparoscopic appendectomy, showing complications and results to determine the advantages and efficacy of laparoscopy. METHODS: We used this technique from December 1990 to December 1998 on 282 consecutive and non-selected patients (169 f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Croce, E., Olmi, S., Azzola, M., Russo, R.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10694075
_version_ 1782195495050936320
author Croce, E.
Olmi, S.
Azzola, M.
Russo, R.
author_facet Croce, E.
Olmi, S.
Azzola, M.
Russo, R.
author_sort Croce, E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This is a presentation of our 8-year experience in laparoscopic appendectomy, showing complications and results to determine the advantages and efficacy of laparoscopy. METHODS: We used this technique from December 1990 to December 1998 on 282 consecutive and non-selected patients (169 females and 113 males) with an average age of 24 years (range 5-86 years). All patients were suffering from sub-acute appendicitis or chronic appendicopathies, except for 84 (29.7%) cases of acute appendicitis and 25 (8.9%) cases of gangrenous appendicitis with peritonitis. All patients with suspected appendicitis were evaluated with a laparoscopic exploration. RESULTS: In 39 patients (13.9%), appendectomy was performed along with 19 enucleated or endocoagulated ovarian cysts, 8 adhesiolyses, 6 transperitoneal hernioplasties (4 right and 2 left), 2 cholecystectomies, 2 excisions of a Meckel diverticulum, 1 aspiration and suture of a right tubal pregnancy and 1 electrodesiccation of pelvic endometriosis. Thirty-five patients (12.5%) revealed the presence of a gynecological-type pathology. We performed 2 (0.7%) conversions to open exploration and experienced 6 (2.1%) complications, of which only 1 (0.35%) was a major complication: a delayed hemoperitoneum (1 liter), re-operated elsewhere, the cause of which was not identified. We performed 4 (1.4%) relaparoscopies for retrocecal abscess (three patients with primary gangrenous appendicitis and peritonitis presenting with an abscess in the right iliac fossa and in one patient with widespread intestinal adhesions with primary acute appendicitis). No patient with a diagnosis of a normal appendix developed an intraperitoneal abscess. Mortality was non-existent. The postoperative course, which was subjectively better than in cases operated in the traditional way, was, on an average, 2 days (range 1-18 days) for appendectomies carried out with the traditional laparoscopic technique and 1 day for appendectomies carried out with the minilaparoscopic technique (6 patients). CONCLUSION: We believe that the laparoscopic technique can handle any type of clinical situation, as it can cure several pathologies during the same session with minimal trauma and maximum benefit for the patient. The advantages of a minilaparoscopy approach are based on its low invasiveness and small surgical wounds.
format Text
id pubmed-3015359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1999
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30153592011-02-17 Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Minilaparoscopic Approach: A Retrospective Review After 8-Years' Experience Croce, E. Olmi, S. Azzola, M. Russo, R. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND: This is a presentation of our 8-year experience in laparoscopic appendectomy, showing complications and results to determine the advantages and efficacy of laparoscopy. METHODS: We used this technique from December 1990 to December 1998 on 282 consecutive and non-selected patients (169 females and 113 males) with an average age of 24 years (range 5-86 years). All patients were suffering from sub-acute appendicitis or chronic appendicopathies, except for 84 (29.7%) cases of acute appendicitis and 25 (8.9%) cases of gangrenous appendicitis with peritonitis. All patients with suspected appendicitis were evaluated with a laparoscopic exploration. RESULTS: In 39 patients (13.9%), appendectomy was performed along with 19 enucleated or endocoagulated ovarian cysts, 8 adhesiolyses, 6 transperitoneal hernioplasties (4 right and 2 left), 2 cholecystectomies, 2 excisions of a Meckel diverticulum, 1 aspiration and suture of a right tubal pregnancy and 1 electrodesiccation of pelvic endometriosis. Thirty-five patients (12.5%) revealed the presence of a gynecological-type pathology. We performed 2 (0.7%) conversions to open exploration and experienced 6 (2.1%) complications, of which only 1 (0.35%) was a major complication: a delayed hemoperitoneum (1 liter), re-operated elsewhere, the cause of which was not identified. We performed 4 (1.4%) relaparoscopies for retrocecal abscess (three patients with primary gangrenous appendicitis and peritonitis presenting with an abscess in the right iliac fossa and in one patient with widespread intestinal adhesions with primary acute appendicitis). No patient with a diagnosis of a normal appendix developed an intraperitoneal abscess. Mortality was non-existent. The postoperative course, which was subjectively better than in cases operated in the traditional way, was, on an average, 2 days (range 1-18 days) for appendectomies carried out with the traditional laparoscopic technique and 1 day for appendectomies carried out with the minilaparoscopic technique (6 patients). CONCLUSION: We believe that the laparoscopic technique can handle any type of clinical situation, as it can cure several pathologies during the same session with minimal trauma and maximum benefit for the patient. The advantages of a minilaparoscopy approach are based on its low invasiveness and small surgical wounds. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 1999 /pmc/articles/PMC3015359/ /pubmed/10694075 Text en © 1999 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Croce, E.
Olmi, S.
Azzola, M.
Russo, R.
Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Minilaparoscopic Approach: A Retrospective Review After 8-Years' Experience
title Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Minilaparoscopic Approach: A Retrospective Review After 8-Years' Experience
title_full Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Minilaparoscopic Approach: A Retrospective Review After 8-Years' Experience
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Minilaparoscopic Approach: A Retrospective Review After 8-Years' Experience
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Minilaparoscopic Approach: A Retrospective Review After 8-Years' Experience
title_short Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Minilaparoscopic Approach: A Retrospective Review After 8-Years' Experience
title_sort laparoscopic appendectomy and minilaparoscopic approach: a retrospective review after 8-years' experience
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10694075
work_keys_str_mv AT crocee laparoscopicappendectomyandminilaparoscopicapproacharetrospectivereviewafter8yearsexperience
AT olmis laparoscopicappendectomyandminilaparoscopicapproacharetrospectivereviewafter8yearsexperience
AT azzolam laparoscopicappendectomyandminilaparoscopicapproacharetrospectivereviewafter8yearsexperience
AT russor laparoscopicappendectomyandminilaparoscopicapproacharetrospectivereviewafter8yearsexperience