Cargando…

Laparoscopy in Patients with Prior Surgery: Results of the Blind Approach

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the complication rate due to blind access laparoscopy between patients with or without a prior history of laparotomy. METHODS: We examined a prospective record of data on laparoscopic surgeries performed from 1992 to 1998. Only cases in which the Veress needle a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lécuru, Fabrice, Leonard, Franck, Jais, Jean Philippe, Rizk, Elie, Robin, François, Taurelle, Roland
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11303989
_version_ 1782195505555570688
author Lécuru, Fabrice
Leonard, Franck
Jais, Jean Philippe
Rizk, Elie
Robin, François
Taurelle, Roland
author_facet Lécuru, Fabrice
Leonard, Franck
Jais, Jean Philippe
Rizk, Elie
Robin, François
Taurelle, Roland
author_sort Lécuru, Fabrice
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the complication rate due to blind access laparoscopy between patients with or without a prior history of laparotomy. METHODS: We examined a prospective record of data on laparoscopic surgeries performed from 1992 to 1998. Only cases in which the Veress needle and the first trocar were inserted through the umbilicus were included in this study. Results issued from patients without previous abdominal surgery (Group I) were compared with those arising from women with prior laparotomy (Group II). A statistical analysis was performed using the Chisquare test or Fisher exact test when appropriate. RESULTS: One thousand thirty-three laparoscopies were carried out during the study period, 881 of which began with a blind access through the umbilicus. Two hundred two women (19.3% ) had an history of abdominal or pelvic surgery. Eight hundred forty-two patients were included in Group I and 39 in Group II. Failure to penetrate into the peritoneal cavity occurred significantly more frequently in Group II (4/39) than in Group I (1/842, P < 0.0001). The insertion of the Veress needle gave rise to 2 complications in Group I and 0 in Group II (P = 1.0). Transumbilical trocar insertion gave rise to 1 complication in each group (1/841 vs. 1/35, P = 0.11). When all events were considered, incidents or accidents were significantly more frequent in Group II (5/39) than in Group I (4/842)(P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We recorded a higher rate of incidents/complications due to the Veress needle and trocar insertion in patients with a previous history of laparotomy. An adapted approach should be recommended for these patients.
format Text
id pubmed-3015404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30154042011-02-17 Laparoscopy in Patients with Prior Surgery: Results of the Blind Approach Lécuru, Fabrice Leonard, Franck Jais, Jean Philippe Rizk, Elie Robin, François Taurelle, Roland JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the complication rate due to blind access laparoscopy between patients with or without a prior history of laparotomy. METHODS: We examined a prospective record of data on laparoscopic surgeries performed from 1992 to 1998. Only cases in which the Veress needle and the first trocar were inserted through the umbilicus were included in this study. Results issued from patients without previous abdominal surgery (Group I) were compared with those arising from women with prior laparotomy (Group II). A statistical analysis was performed using the Chisquare test or Fisher exact test when appropriate. RESULTS: One thousand thirty-three laparoscopies were carried out during the study period, 881 of which began with a blind access through the umbilicus. Two hundred two women (19.3% ) had an history of abdominal or pelvic surgery. Eight hundred forty-two patients were included in Group I and 39 in Group II. Failure to penetrate into the peritoneal cavity occurred significantly more frequently in Group II (4/39) than in Group I (1/842, P < 0.0001). The insertion of the Veress needle gave rise to 2 complications in Group I and 0 in Group II (P = 1.0). Transumbilical trocar insertion gave rise to 1 complication in each group (1/841 vs. 1/35, P = 0.11). When all events were considered, incidents or accidents were significantly more frequent in Group II (5/39) than in Group I (4/842)(P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We recorded a higher rate of incidents/complications due to the Veress needle and trocar insertion in patients with a previous history of laparotomy. An adapted approach should be recommended for these patients. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2001 /pmc/articles/PMC3015404/ /pubmed/11303989 Text en © 2001 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Lécuru, Fabrice
Leonard, Franck
Jais, Jean Philippe
Rizk, Elie
Robin, François
Taurelle, Roland
Laparoscopy in Patients with Prior Surgery: Results of the Blind Approach
title Laparoscopy in Patients with Prior Surgery: Results of the Blind Approach
title_full Laparoscopy in Patients with Prior Surgery: Results of the Blind Approach
title_fullStr Laparoscopy in Patients with Prior Surgery: Results of the Blind Approach
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopy in Patients with Prior Surgery: Results of the Blind Approach
title_short Laparoscopy in Patients with Prior Surgery: Results of the Blind Approach
title_sort laparoscopy in patients with prior surgery: results of the blind approach
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11303989
work_keys_str_mv AT lecurufabrice laparoscopyinpatientswithpriorsurgeryresultsoftheblindapproach
AT leonardfranck laparoscopyinpatientswithpriorsurgeryresultsoftheblindapproach
AT jaisjeanphilippe laparoscopyinpatientswithpriorsurgeryresultsoftheblindapproach
AT rizkelie laparoscopyinpatientswithpriorsurgeryresultsoftheblindapproach
AT robinfrancois laparoscopyinpatientswithpriorsurgeryresultsoftheblindapproach
AT taurelleroland laparoscopyinpatientswithpriorsurgeryresultsoftheblindapproach