Cargando…

Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the last few years many new instruments and devices have been developed and introduced into the operating room (OR). A debate has been ongoing about the optimal ergonomic posture for the operating staff. From practical experience, we have learned that the operating tabl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matern, Ulrich, Waller, Peter, Giebmeyer, Carsten, Rückauer, Klaus D., Farthmann, Eduard H.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11303999
_version_ 1782195506274893824
author Matern, Ulrich
Waller, Peter
Giebmeyer, Carsten
Rückauer, Klaus D.
Farthmann, Eduard H.
author_facet Matern, Ulrich
Waller, Peter
Giebmeyer, Carsten
Rückauer, Klaus D.
Farthmann, Eduard H.
author_sort Matern, Ulrich
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the last few years many new instruments and devices have been developed and introduced into the operating room (OR). A debate has been ongoing about the optimal ergonomic posture for the operating staff. From practical experience, we have learned that the operating tables cannot be adjusted adequately to allow surgeons of different stature to maintain a comfortable posture. The goal of this study was to establish the most ergonomic table height for the particular physique of the surgeon and the different types of laparoscopic instrument handles that he or she uses. METHODS: In a simulated model, two probands of different stature (50th {BS 50} and 95th {BS 95} percentile) used laparoscopic instruments with four different handle designs (shank, pistol, axial, and rod). The instruments were inserted into a board in three different angles ({IA} = 20°, 30°, 40°). Additionally the elbow angles (EA) of the volunteers were fixed to either 90° or 120°. For every variable (size of surgeon and his or her elbow angle, design of handle, insertion angle of the instrument) the height of the board, as a parameter for the level of the abdominal wall of a patient with pneumoperitioneum, was measured from the floor. RESULTS: All parameters had an effect on the optimal operating table height. The lowest required operating table level was 30 cm, the highest was 60.5 cm. In laparoscopic surgery–long shafted instruments and patients with pneumoperitoneum–the tabletops are too high for over 95% of all surgeons. As skin incision and wound suture are performed the conventional way, the operating tabletop must be adjustable up to the common height of 122 cm. The maximal difference between the optimal heights of the ORtable for one volunteer using two different handles with different insertion angles of the instruments (BS 95, EA 90°, IA 20°, rod handle to BS 50, EA 120°, IA 40°, axial handle) was about 27 cm. CONCLUSION: New operating tables with a much lower adjustability are necessary to fulfill ergonomic requirements. The use of differently designed handles can hinder the ergonomic posture of the surgeon, because each handle requires a different working height.
format Text
id pubmed-3015407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30154072011-02-17 Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables Matern, Ulrich Waller, Peter Giebmeyer, Carsten Rückauer, Klaus D. Farthmann, Eduard H. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the last few years many new instruments and devices have been developed and introduced into the operating room (OR). A debate has been ongoing about the optimal ergonomic posture for the operating staff. From practical experience, we have learned that the operating tables cannot be adjusted adequately to allow surgeons of different stature to maintain a comfortable posture. The goal of this study was to establish the most ergonomic table height for the particular physique of the surgeon and the different types of laparoscopic instrument handles that he or she uses. METHODS: In a simulated model, two probands of different stature (50th {BS 50} and 95th {BS 95} percentile) used laparoscopic instruments with four different handle designs (shank, pistol, axial, and rod). The instruments were inserted into a board in three different angles ({IA} = 20°, 30°, 40°). Additionally the elbow angles (EA) of the volunteers were fixed to either 90° or 120°. For every variable (size of surgeon and his or her elbow angle, design of handle, insertion angle of the instrument) the height of the board, as a parameter for the level of the abdominal wall of a patient with pneumoperitioneum, was measured from the floor. RESULTS: All parameters had an effect on the optimal operating table height. The lowest required operating table level was 30 cm, the highest was 60.5 cm. In laparoscopic surgery–long shafted instruments and patients with pneumoperitoneum–the tabletops are too high for over 95% of all surgeons. As skin incision and wound suture are performed the conventional way, the operating tabletop must be adjustable up to the common height of 122 cm. The maximal difference between the optimal heights of the ORtable for one volunteer using two different handles with different insertion angles of the instruments (BS 95, EA 90°, IA 20°, rod handle to BS 50, EA 120°, IA 40°, axial handle) was about 27 cm. CONCLUSION: New operating tables with a much lower adjustability are necessary to fulfill ergonomic requirements. The use of differently designed handles can hinder the ergonomic posture of the surgeon, because each handle requires a different working height. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2001 /pmc/articles/PMC3015407/ /pubmed/11303999 Text en © 2001 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Matern, Ulrich
Waller, Peter
Giebmeyer, Carsten
Rückauer, Klaus D.
Farthmann, Eduard H.
Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables
title Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables
title_full Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables
title_fullStr Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables
title_full_unstemmed Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables
title_short Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables
title_sort ergonomics: requirements for adjusting the height of laparoscopic operating tables
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11303999
work_keys_str_mv AT maternulrich ergonomicsrequirementsforadjustingtheheightoflaparoscopicoperatingtables
AT wallerpeter ergonomicsrequirementsforadjustingtheheightoflaparoscopicoperatingtables
AT giebmeyercarsten ergonomicsrequirementsforadjustingtheheightoflaparoscopicoperatingtables
AT ruckauerklausd ergonomicsrequirementsforadjustingtheheightoflaparoscopicoperatingtables
AT farthmanneduardh ergonomicsrequirementsforadjustingtheheightoflaparoscopicoperatingtables