Cargando…
Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the last few years many new instruments and devices have been developed and introduced into the operating room (OR). A debate has been ongoing about the optimal ergonomic posture for the operating staff. From practical experience, we have learned that the operating tabl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11303999 |
_version_ | 1782195506274893824 |
---|---|
author | Matern, Ulrich Waller, Peter Giebmeyer, Carsten Rückauer, Klaus D. Farthmann, Eduard H. |
author_facet | Matern, Ulrich Waller, Peter Giebmeyer, Carsten Rückauer, Klaus D. Farthmann, Eduard H. |
author_sort | Matern, Ulrich |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the last few years many new instruments and devices have been developed and introduced into the operating room (OR). A debate has been ongoing about the optimal ergonomic posture for the operating staff. From practical experience, we have learned that the operating tables cannot be adjusted adequately to allow surgeons of different stature to maintain a comfortable posture. The goal of this study was to establish the most ergonomic table height for the particular physique of the surgeon and the different types of laparoscopic instrument handles that he or she uses. METHODS: In a simulated model, two probands of different stature (50th {BS 50} and 95th {BS 95} percentile) used laparoscopic instruments with four different handle designs (shank, pistol, axial, and rod). The instruments were inserted into a board in three different angles ({IA} = 20°, 30°, 40°). Additionally the elbow angles (EA) of the volunteers were fixed to either 90° or 120°. For every variable (size of surgeon and his or her elbow angle, design of handle, insertion angle of the instrument) the height of the board, as a parameter for the level of the abdominal wall of a patient with pneumoperitioneum, was measured from the floor. RESULTS: All parameters had an effect on the optimal operating table height. The lowest required operating table level was 30 cm, the highest was 60.5 cm. In laparoscopic surgery–long shafted instruments and patients with pneumoperitoneum–the tabletops are too high for over 95% of all surgeons. As skin incision and wound suture are performed the conventional way, the operating tabletop must be adjustable up to the common height of 122 cm. The maximal difference between the optimal heights of the ORtable for one volunteer using two different handles with different insertion angles of the instruments (BS 95, EA 90°, IA 20°, rod handle to BS 50, EA 120°, IA 40°, axial handle) was about 27 cm. CONCLUSION: New operating tables with a much lower adjustability are necessary to fulfill ergonomic requirements. The use of differently designed handles can hinder the ergonomic posture of the surgeon, because each handle requires a different working height. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3015407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30154072011-02-17 Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables Matern, Ulrich Waller, Peter Giebmeyer, Carsten Rückauer, Klaus D. Farthmann, Eduard H. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the last few years many new instruments and devices have been developed and introduced into the operating room (OR). A debate has been ongoing about the optimal ergonomic posture for the operating staff. From practical experience, we have learned that the operating tables cannot be adjusted adequately to allow surgeons of different stature to maintain a comfortable posture. The goal of this study was to establish the most ergonomic table height for the particular physique of the surgeon and the different types of laparoscopic instrument handles that he or she uses. METHODS: In a simulated model, two probands of different stature (50th {BS 50} and 95th {BS 95} percentile) used laparoscopic instruments with four different handle designs (shank, pistol, axial, and rod). The instruments were inserted into a board in three different angles ({IA} = 20°, 30°, 40°). Additionally the elbow angles (EA) of the volunteers were fixed to either 90° or 120°. For every variable (size of surgeon and his or her elbow angle, design of handle, insertion angle of the instrument) the height of the board, as a parameter for the level of the abdominal wall of a patient with pneumoperitioneum, was measured from the floor. RESULTS: All parameters had an effect on the optimal operating table height. The lowest required operating table level was 30 cm, the highest was 60.5 cm. In laparoscopic surgery–long shafted instruments and patients with pneumoperitoneum–the tabletops are too high for over 95% of all surgeons. As skin incision and wound suture are performed the conventional way, the operating tabletop must be adjustable up to the common height of 122 cm. The maximal difference between the optimal heights of the ORtable for one volunteer using two different handles with different insertion angles of the instruments (BS 95, EA 90°, IA 20°, rod handle to BS 50, EA 120°, IA 40°, axial handle) was about 27 cm. CONCLUSION: New operating tables with a much lower adjustability are necessary to fulfill ergonomic requirements. The use of differently designed handles can hinder the ergonomic posture of the surgeon, because each handle requires a different working height. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2001 /pmc/articles/PMC3015407/ /pubmed/11303999 Text en © 2001 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Matern, Ulrich Waller, Peter Giebmeyer, Carsten Rückauer, Klaus D. Farthmann, Eduard H. Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables |
title | Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables |
title_full | Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables |
title_fullStr | Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables |
title_full_unstemmed | Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables |
title_short | Ergonomics: Requirements for Adjusting the Height of Laparoscopic Operating Tables |
title_sort | ergonomics: requirements for adjusting the height of laparoscopic operating tables |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11303999 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maternulrich ergonomicsrequirementsforadjustingtheheightoflaparoscopicoperatingtables AT wallerpeter ergonomicsrequirementsforadjustingtheheightoflaparoscopicoperatingtables AT giebmeyercarsten ergonomicsrequirementsforadjustingtheheightoflaparoscopicoperatingtables AT ruckauerklausd ergonomicsrequirementsforadjustingtheheightoflaparoscopicoperatingtables AT farthmanneduardh ergonomicsrequirementsforadjustingtheheightoflaparoscopicoperatingtables |