Cargando…

Expert Videotape Analysis and Critiquing Benefit Laparoscopic Skills Training of Urologists

INTRODUCTION: Teaching laparoscopic skills has become the focus of the latest generation of hands-on laparoscopic courses. METHODS: Thirty-four practicing urologists, ages 31 to 61 years (mean, 46.6 years) with laparoscopic experience (range, 0 to 200, mean, 27.6 cases), 32 of whom had taken prior A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakada, Stephen Y., Hedican, Sean P., Bishoff, Jay T., Shichman, Steven J., Wolf, J. Stuart
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15119667
_version_ 1782195534449082368
author Nakada, Stephen Y.
Hedican, Sean P.
Bishoff, Jay T.
Shichman, Steven J.
Wolf, J. Stuart
author_facet Nakada, Stephen Y.
Hedican, Sean P.
Bishoff, Jay T.
Shichman, Steven J.
Wolf, J. Stuart
author_sort Nakada, Stephen Y.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Teaching laparoscopic skills has become the focus of the latest generation of hands-on laparoscopic courses. METHODS: Thirty-four practicing urologists, ages 31 to 61 years (mean, 46.6 years) with laparoscopic experience (range, 0 to 200, mean, 27.6 cases), 32 of whom had taken prior American Urological Association (AUA) laparoscopy courses, participated in an AUA-sponsored hands-on laparoscopic skills course over a 2-day period in August 2002 or March 2003. They all took a knowledge assessment examination and performed standardized tasks (rope passing, ring placement, and laparoscopic suturing and knot tying) at the beginning and the end of the course with a videotape analysis and critique. Prior to the repeat-skills assessment, each participant was individually critiqued and instructed based on a videotape review of their initial performance. The urologists also participated in a porcine laboratory and a pelvic trainer session totaling 6 hours between skills assessments. None of the participants had performed significant laparoscopic suturing prior to the course. RESULTS: Using Wilcoxon's signed rank test, the participants improved from a mean of 119.32 seconds to 98.36 seconds with the rope pass (P= 0.0001), and with the ring placement from a mean of 9.70/minute to 12.09/minute (P=0.0001). All participants had significantly fewer false passes (mean, 9.35 compared with 5.21) during repeat skills assessments (P=0.0001). Participants improved from 0.54 sutures/minute to 1.22 sutures/ minute following the video critique and practice (P=0.0001). Degree of laparoscopic experience (number of cases), age of the urologist, and precourse knowledge (examination score) had no significant bearing on results in the initial skills assessment or in the improvement of task time (Spearman correlation coefficients). CONCLUSION: Urologists with some laparoscopic experience (mean 27.6 cases) can improve laparoscopic skills using mentored videotape analysis and experience gained from a 2-day hands-on course. Prior knowledge, degree of experience, and urologist age had no significant bearing on performance in this setting.
format Text
id pubmed-3015519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30155192011-02-17 Expert Videotape Analysis and Critiquing Benefit Laparoscopic Skills Training of Urologists Nakada, Stephen Y. Hedican, Sean P. Bishoff, Jay T. Shichman, Steven J. Wolf, J. Stuart JSLS Case Reports INTRODUCTION: Teaching laparoscopic skills has become the focus of the latest generation of hands-on laparoscopic courses. METHODS: Thirty-four practicing urologists, ages 31 to 61 years (mean, 46.6 years) with laparoscopic experience (range, 0 to 200, mean, 27.6 cases), 32 of whom had taken prior American Urological Association (AUA) laparoscopy courses, participated in an AUA-sponsored hands-on laparoscopic skills course over a 2-day period in August 2002 or March 2003. They all took a knowledge assessment examination and performed standardized tasks (rope passing, ring placement, and laparoscopic suturing and knot tying) at the beginning and the end of the course with a videotape analysis and critique. Prior to the repeat-skills assessment, each participant was individually critiqued and instructed based on a videotape review of their initial performance. The urologists also participated in a porcine laboratory and a pelvic trainer session totaling 6 hours between skills assessments. None of the participants had performed significant laparoscopic suturing prior to the course. RESULTS: Using Wilcoxon's signed rank test, the participants improved from a mean of 119.32 seconds to 98.36 seconds with the rope pass (P= 0.0001), and with the ring placement from a mean of 9.70/minute to 12.09/minute (P=0.0001). All participants had significantly fewer false passes (mean, 9.35 compared with 5.21) during repeat skills assessments (P=0.0001). Participants improved from 0.54 sutures/minute to 1.22 sutures/ minute following the video critique and practice (P=0.0001). Degree of laparoscopic experience (number of cases), age of the urologist, and precourse knowledge (examination score) had no significant bearing on results in the initial skills assessment or in the improvement of task time (Spearman correlation coefficients). CONCLUSION: Urologists with some laparoscopic experience (mean 27.6 cases) can improve laparoscopic skills using mentored videotape analysis and experience gained from a 2-day hands-on course. Prior knowledge, degree of experience, and urologist age had no significant bearing on performance in this setting. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2004 /pmc/articles/PMC3015519/ /pubmed/15119667 Text en © 2004 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Case Reports
Nakada, Stephen Y.
Hedican, Sean P.
Bishoff, Jay T.
Shichman, Steven J.
Wolf, J. Stuart
Expert Videotape Analysis and Critiquing Benefit Laparoscopic Skills Training of Urologists
title Expert Videotape Analysis and Critiquing Benefit Laparoscopic Skills Training of Urologists
title_full Expert Videotape Analysis and Critiquing Benefit Laparoscopic Skills Training of Urologists
title_fullStr Expert Videotape Analysis and Critiquing Benefit Laparoscopic Skills Training of Urologists
title_full_unstemmed Expert Videotape Analysis and Critiquing Benefit Laparoscopic Skills Training of Urologists
title_short Expert Videotape Analysis and Critiquing Benefit Laparoscopic Skills Training of Urologists
title_sort expert videotape analysis and critiquing benefit laparoscopic skills training of urologists
topic Case Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15119667
work_keys_str_mv AT nakadastepheny expertvideotapeanalysisandcritiquingbenefitlaparoscopicskillstrainingofurologists
AT hedicanseanp expertvideotapeanalysisandcritiquingbenefitlaparoscopicskillstrainingofurologists
AT bishoffjayt expertvideotapeanalysisandcritiquingbenefitlaparoscopicskillstrainingofurologists
AT shichmanstevenj expertvideotapeanalysisandcritiquingbenefitlaparoscopicskillstrainingofurologists
AT wolfjstuart expertvideotapeanalysisandcritiquingbenefitlaparoscopicskillstrainingofurologists