Cargando…

Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device

BACKGROUND: Suturing and knot tying are basic skills for surgeons. Performing these tasks laparoscopically can be a tedious, time-consuming endeavor associated with much frustration. We evaluated a mechanically assisted suture and pretied knot device (Quik-Stitch) for performing the basic tasks of s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bermas, Honnie, Fenoglio, Michael, Haun, William, Moore, John T.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15119668
_version_ 1782195537264508928
author Bermas, Honnie
Fenoglio, Michael
Haun, William
Moore, John T.
author_facet Bermas, Honnie
Fenoglio, Michael
Haun, William
Moore, John T.
author_sort Bermas, Honnie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Suturing and knot tying are basic skills for surgeons. Performing these tasks laparoscopically can be a tedious, time-consuming endeavor associated with much frustration. We evaluated a mechanically assisted suture and pretied knot device (Quik-Stitch) for performing the basic tasks of suturing and knot tying. METHODS: We performed a time study using 1) intracorporeal suturing and knot tying, 2) intracorporeal suturing and extracorporeal knot tying, and 3) a mechanically assisted suture and pretied knot device (Quik-Stitch). From September 2000 through March 2001, time trials were conducted using each of the different techniques. Three attending surgeons, one with much experience and 2 with less experience, and 2 chief residents, with the least experience, participated in the study. RESULTS: For the experienced surgeon, the average times for intracorporeal knot tying, extracorporeal knot tying, and knot tying with Quik-Stitch were 97.3, 103.9, and 67.7 seconds, respectively. For the less experienced surgeons, the times were 237.2, 224.3, and 92.5 seconds, respectively. For the least experienced group, the times were 265.3, 263.0, and 128.7 seconds, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanically assisted suture device and pretied knot (Quik-Stitch by PARE Surgical, Inc, Englewood, CO, USA) provides significant time-saving to surgeons regardless of experience and thus reduces operating room costs. Less experienced surgeons and surgeons in training benefited the most by the use of this device.
format Text
id pubmed-3015531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30155312011-02-17 Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device Bermas, Honnie Fenoglio, Michael Haun, William Moore, John T. JSLS Case Reports BACKGROUND: Suturing and knot tying are basic skills for surgeons. Performing these tasks laparoscopically can be a tedious, time-consuming endeavor associated with much frustration. We evaluated a mechanically assisted suture and pretied knot device (Quik-Stitch) for performing the basic tasks of suturing and knot tying. METHODS: We performed a time study using 1) intracorporeal suturing and knot tying, 2) intracorporeal suturing and extracorporeal knot tying, and 3) a mechanically assisted suture and pretied knot device (Quik-Stitch). From September 2000 through March 2001, time trials were conducted using each of the different techniques. Three attending surgeons, one with much experience and 2 with less experience, and 2 chief residents, with the least experience, participated in the study. RESULTS: For the experienced surgeon, the average times for intracorporeal knot tying, extracorporeal knot tying, and knot tying with Quik-Stitch were 97.3, 103.9, and 67.7 seconds, respectively. For the less experienced surgeons, the times were 237.2, 224.3, and 92.5 seconds, respectively. For the least experienced group, the times were 265.3, 263.0, and 128.7 seconds, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanically assisted suture device and pretied knot (Quik-Stitch by PARE Surgical, Inc, Englewood, CO, USA) provides significant time-saving to surgeons regardless of experience and thus reduces operating room costs. Less experienced surgeons and surgeons in training benefited the most by the use of this device. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2004 /pmc/articles/PMC3015531/ /pubmed/15119668 Text en © 2004 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Case Reports
Bermas, Honnie
Fenoglio, Michael
Haun, William
Moore, John T.
Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device
title Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device
title_full Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device
title_short Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device
title_sort laparoscopic suturing and knot tying: a comparison of standard techniques to a mechanical assist device
topic Case Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15119668
work_keys_str_mv AT bermashonnie laparoscopicsuturingandknottyingacomparisonofstandardtechniquestoamechanicalassistdevice
AT fenogliomichael laparoscopicsuturingandknottyingacomparisonofstandardtechniquestoamechanicalassistdevice
AT haunwilliam laparoscopicsuturingandknottyingacomparisonofstandardtechniquestoamechanicalassistdevice
AT moorejohnt laparoscopicsuturingandknottyingacomparisonofstandardtechniquestoamechanicalassistdevice