Cargando…
Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device
BACKGROUND: Suturing and knot tying are basic skills for surgeons. Performing these tasks laparoscopically can be a tedious, time-consuming endeavor associated with much frustration. We evaluated a mechanically assisted suture and pretied knot device (Quik-Stitch) for performing the basic tasks of s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15119668 |
_version_ | 1782195537264508928 |
---|---|
author | Bermas, Honnie Fenoglio, Michael Haun, William Moore, John T. |
author_facet | Bermas, Honnie Fenoglio, Michael Haun, William Moore, John T. |
author_sort | Bermas, Honnie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Suturing and knot tying are basic skills for surgeons. Performing these tasks laparoscopically can be a tedious, time-consuming endeavor associated with much frustration. We evaluated a mechanically assisted suture and pretied knot device (Quik-Stitch) for performing the basic tasks of suturing and knot tying. METHODS: We performed a time study using 1) intracorporeal suturing and knot tying, 2) intracorporeal suturing and extracorporeal knot tying, and 3) a mechanically assisted suture and pretied knot device (Quik-Stitch). From September 2000 through March 2001, time trials were conducted using each of the different techniques. Three attending surgeons, one with much experience and 2 with less experience, and 2 chief residents, with the least experience, participated in the study. RESULTS: For the experienced surgeon, the average times for intracorporeal knot tying, extracorporeal knot tying, and knot tying with Quik-Stitch were 97.3, 103.9, and 67.7 seconds, respectively. For the less experienced surgeons, the times were 237.2, 224.3, and 92.5 seconds, respectively. For the least experienced group, the times were 265.3, 263.0, and 128.7 seconds, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanically assisted suture device and pretied knot (Quik-Stitch by PARE Surgical, Inc, Englewood, CO, USA) provides significant time-saving to surgeons regardless of experience and thus reduces operating room costs. Less experienced surgeons and surgeons in training benefited the most by the use of this device. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3015531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30155312011-02-17 Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device Bermas, Honnie Fenoglio, Michael Haun, William Moore, John T. JSLS Case Reports BACKGROUND: Suturing and knot tying are basic skills for surgeons. Performing these tasks laparoscopically can be a tedious, time-consuming endeavor associated with much frustration. We evaluated a mechanically assisted suture and pretied knot device (Quik-Stitch) for performing the basic tasks of suturing and knot tying. METHODS: We performed a time study using 1) intracorporeal suturing and knot tying, 2) intracorporeal suturing and extracorporeal knot tying, and 3) a mechanically assisted suture and pretied knot device (Quik-Stitch). From September 2000 through March 2001, time trials were conducted using each of the different techniques. Three attending surgeons, one with much experience and 2 with less experience, and 2 chief residents, with the least experience, participated in the study. RESULTS: For the experienced surgeon, the average times for intracorporeal knot tying, extracorporeal knot tying, and knot tying with Quik-Stitch were 97.3, 103.9, and 67.7 seconds, respectively. For the less experienced surgeons, the times were 237.2, 224.3, and 92.5 seconds, respectively. For the least experienced group, the times were 265.3, 263.0, and 128.7 seconds, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanically assisted suture device and pretied knot (Quik-Stitch by PARE Surgical, Inc, Englewood, CO, USA) provides significant time-saving to surgeons regardless of experience and thus reduces operating room costs. Less experienced surgeons and surgeons in training benefited the most by the use of this device. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2004 /pmc/articles/PMC3015531/ /pubmed/15119668 Text en © 2004 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Case Reports Bermas, Honnie Fenoglio, Michael Haun, William Moore, John T. Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device |
title | Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device |
title_full | Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device |
title_short | Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying: A Comparison of Standard Techniques to a Mechanical Assist Device |
title_sort | laparoscopic suturing and knot tying: a comparison of standard techniques to a mechanical assist device |
topic | Case Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15119668 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bermashonnie laparoscopicsuturingandknottyingacomparisonofstandardtechniquestoamechanicalassistdevice AT fenogliomichael laparoscopicsuturingandknottyingacomparisonofstandardtechniquestoamechanicalassistdevice AT haunwilliam laparoscopicsuturingandknottyingacomparisonofstandardtechniquestoamechanicalassistdevice AT moorejohnt laparoscopicsuturingandknottyingacomparisonofstandardtechniquestoamechanicalassistdevice |