Cargando…

Results of Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal and Incisional Hernia Repair

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is a frequent complication of abdominal surgery. The object of this study was to confirm the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of laparoscopic treatment of abdominal wall defects. METHODS: Fifty consecutive laparoscopic abdominal and incisional hernia repairs from Septe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olmi, Stefano, Magnone, Stefano, Erba, Luigi, Bertolini, Aimone, Croce, Enrico
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15984708
_version_ 1782195546020118528
author Olmi, Stefano
Magnone, Stefano
Erba, Luigi
Bertolini, Aimone
Croce, Enrico
author_facet Olmi, Stefano
Magnone, Stefano
Erba, Luigi
Bertolini, Aimone
Croce, Enrico
author_sort Olmi, Stefano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is a frequent complication of abdominal surgery. The object of this study was to confirm the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of laparoscopic treatment of abdominal wall defects. METHODS: Fifty consecutive laparoscopic abdominal and incisional hernia repairs from September 2001 to May 2003 were compared with 50 open anterior repairs. RESULTS: The 2 groups were not different for age, body mass index, or American Society of Anaesthesiologists scores. Mean operative time was 59 minutes for the laparoscopic group, 164.5 minutes for the open group. Mean hernia diameter was 10.6 cm for the laparoscopic group, 10.5 cm for the open group. Mean length of stay was 2.1 days for the laparoscopic group, 8.1 days for the open group. Complications occurred in 16% of the laparoscopic and 50% of open group. Median follow-up was 9.0 months for the laparoscopic group, 24.5 months for the open group. Recurrence rates were 2% for laparoscopic group and 0% for the open group. CONCLUSION: Results for laparoscopic abdominal and incisional hernia repair seem to be superior to results for open repair in terms of operative time, length of stay, wound infection, major complications, and overall hospital reimbursement.
format Text
id pubmed-3015567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30155672011-02-17 Results of Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal and Incisional Hernia Repair Olmi, Stefano Magnone, Stefano Erba, Luigi Bertolini, Aimone Croce, Enrico JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia is a frequent complication of abdominal surgery. The object of this study was to confirm the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of laparoscopic treatment of abdominal wall defects. METHODS: Fifty consecutive laparoscopic abdominal and incisional hernia repairs from September 2001 to May 2003 were compared with 50 open anterior repairs. RESULTS: The 2 groups were not different for age, body mass index, or American Society of Anaesthesiologists scores. Mean operative time was 59 minutes for the laparoscopic group, 164.5 minutes for the open group. Mean hernia diameter was 10.6 cm for the laparoscopic group, 10.5 cm for the open group. Mean length of stay was 2.1 days for the laparoscopic group, 8.1 days for the open group. Complications occurred in 16% of the laparoscopic and 50% of open group. Median follow-up was 9.0 months for the laparoscopic group, 24.5 months for the open group. Recurrence rates were 2% for laparoscopic group and 0% for the open group. CONCLUSION: Results for laparoscopic abdominal and incisional hernia repair seem to be superior to results for open repair in terms of operative time, length of stay, wound infection, major complications, and overall hospital reimbursement. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2005 /pmc/articles/PMC3015567/ /pubmed/15984708 Text en © 2005 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Olmi, Stefano
Magnone, Stefano
Erba, Luigi
Bertolini, Aimone
Croce, Enrico
Results of Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal and Incisional Hernia Repair
title Results of Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal and Incisional Hernia Repair
title_full Results of Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal and Incisional Hernia Repair
title_fullStr Results of Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal and Incisional Hernia Repair
title_full_unstemmed Results of Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal and Incisional Hernia Repair
title_short Results of Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominal and Incisional Hernia Repair
title_sort results of laparoscopic versus open abdominal and incisional hernia repair
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15984708
work_keys_str_mv AT olmistefano resultsoflaparoscopicversusopenabdominalandincisionalherniarepair
AT magnonestefano resultsoflaparoscopicversusopenabdominalandincisionalherniarepair
AT erbaluigi resultsoflaparoscopicversusopenabdominalandincisionalherniarepair
AT bertoliniaimone resultsoflaparoscopicversusopenabdominalandincisionalherniarepair
AT croceenrico resultsoflaparoscopicversusopenabdominalandincisionalherniarepair