Cargando…

Laparoscopic-assisted Colon Resections: Long-term Results and Survival

OBJECTIVE: We reviewed the long-term results and patient survival for laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies. The place of laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal carcinomas is controversial. The techniques and expected surgical outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic and lap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehta, Paayal Pinky, Griffin, John, Ganta, Sashidhar, Rangraj, Madhu, Steichen, Felicien
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15984707
_version_ 1782195547428356096
author Mehta, Paayal Pinky
Griffin, John
Ganta, Sashidhar
Rangraj, Madhu
Steichen, Felicien
author_facet Mehta, Paayal Pinky
Griffin, John
Ganta, Sashidhar
Rangraj, Madhu
Steichen, Felicien
author_sort Mehta, Paayal Pinky
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We reviewed the long-term results and patient survival for laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies. The place of laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal carcinomas is controversial. The techniques and expected surgical outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted colectomies are being defined as these procedures become more acceptable and reach parity with, or even surpass, results of traditional operations. Anecdotal reports in the literature describe port-site and incisional tumor implantation in patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted colectomies for colorectal malignancies. This raises concerns about whether these incisional tumor sites are more common in these patients and whether their survival is compromised by the laparoscopic technique. METHODS: The authors reviewed data from 110 patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted colectomies for colorectal cancer to determine the long-term results and survival and to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy to the safety and efficacy of open colectomy. Between July 1991 and June 1999, 350 patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Of these, 110 patients had colorectal malignancies. Survival rates and patterns of recurrence were compared within the various TNM stages and compared with conventional data after open surgery. The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for colorectal carcinomas and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to determine the survival curves. RESULTS: Laparoscopic-assisted colon resections for colorectal malignancies were performed in 110 patients. Fifty-one percent of the patients were women, and 49% percent were men, with a mean age of 78.17 years. The mean follow-up was 43 months. Thirteen patients were converted to open operation due to various difficulties encountered during the procedure. Mean operative time was 128.16 minutes, and mean hospital stay was 6.91 days. Perioperative mortality was 2.77%. There were 4 local recurrences. The ten-year survival rates for the various stages were 78% for stage I, 33% for stage II, 30% for stage III, and 0% for stage IV. No port-site implantations occurred. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-assisted colon resection of colorectal carcinomas is technically feasible and safe. It allows earlier postoperative recovery and a shorter hospital stay. The long-term survival is also satisfactory. The incidence of port-site implants is no more than that with the conventional open technique. Determination of any benefits over the conventional open technique, however, still await prospective randomized trials.
format Text
id pubmed-3015573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30155732011-02-17 Laparoscopic-assisted Colon Resections: Long-term Results and Survival Mehta, Paayal Pinky Griffin, John Ganta, Sashidhar Rangraj, Madhu Steichen, Felicien JSLS Scientific Papers OBJECTIVE: We reviewed the long-term results and patient survival for laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies. The place of laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal carcinomas is controversial. The techniques and expected surgical outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted colectomies are being defined as these procedures become more acceptable and reach parity with, or even surpass, results of traditional operations. Anecdotal reports in the literature describe port-site and incisional tumor implantation in patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted colectomies for colorectal malignancies. This raises concerns about whether these incisional tumor sites are more common in these patients and whether their survival is compromised by the laparoscopic technique. METHODS: The authors reviewed data from 110 patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted colectomies for colorectal cancer to determine the long-term results and survival and to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy to the safety and efficacy of open colectomy. Between July 1991 and June 1999, 350 patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Of these, 110 patients had colorectal malignancies. Survival rates and patterns of recurrence were compared within the various TNM stages and compared with conventional data after open surgery. The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for colorectal carcinomas and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to determine the survival curves. RESULTS: Laparoscopic-assisted colon resections for colorectal malignancies were performed in 110 patients. Fifty-one percent of the patients were women, and 49% percent were men, with a mean age of 78.17 years. The mean follow-up was 43 months. Thirteen patients were converted to open operation due to various difficulties encountered during the procedure. Mean operative time was 128.16 minutes, and mean hospital stay was 6.91 days. Perioperative mortality was 2.77%. There were 4 local recurrences. The ten-year survival rates for the various stages were 78% for stage I, 33% for stage II, 30% for stage III, and 0% for stage IV. No port-site implantations occurred. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-assisted colon resection of colorectal carcinomas is technically feasible and safe. It allows earlier postoperative recovery and a shorter hospital stay. The long-term survival is also satisfactory. The incidence of port-site implants is no more than that with the conventional open technique. Determination of any benefits over the conventional open technique, however, still await prospective randomized trials. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2005 /pmc/articles/PMC3015573/ /pubmed/15984707 Text en © 2005 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Mehta, Paayal Pinky
Griffin, John
Ganta, Sashidhar
Rangraj, Madhu
Steichen, Felicien
Laparoscopic-assisted Colon Resections: Long-term Results and Survival
title Laparoscopic-assisted Colon Resections: Long-term Results and Survival
title_full Laparoscopic-assisted Colon Resections: Long-term Results and Survival
title_fullStr Laparoscopic-assisted Colon Resections: Long-term Results and Survival
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic-assisted Colon Resections: Long-term Results and Survival
title_short Laparoscopic-assisted Colon Resections: Long-term Results and Survival
title_sort laparoscopic-assisted colon resections: long-term results and survival
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15984707
work_keys_str_mv AT mehtapaayalpinky laparoscopicassistedcolonresectionslongtermresultsandsurvival
AT griffinjohn laparoscopicassistedcolonresectionslongtermresultsandsurvival
AT gantasashidhar laparoscopicassistedcolonresectionslongtermresultsandsurvival
AT rangrajmadhu laparoscopicassistedcolonresectionslongtermresultsandsurvival
AT steichenfelicien laparoscopicassistedcolonresectionslongtermresultsandsurvival