Cargando…

Elective Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy for Sigmoid Diverticulitis

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis and to assess its postoperative advantages. METHODS: From 1999 to 2001, 5 patients were selectively operated on with a laparoscopic-assisted procedure for unco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neri, Vincenzo, Ambrosi, Antonio, Di Lauro, Giuseppe, Valentino, Tiziano Pio
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16709361
_version_ 1782195570342887424
author Neri, Vincenzo
Ambrosi, Antonio
Di Lauro, Giuseppe
Valentino, Tiziano Pio
author_facet Neri, Vincenzo
Ambrosi, Antonio
Di Lauro, Giuseppe
Valentino, Tiziano Pio
author_sort Neri, Vincenzo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis and to assess its postoperative advantages. METHODS: From 1999 to 2001, 5 patients were selectively operated on with a laparoscopic-assisted procedure for uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis. In the preceding period (September 1997 through December 1998), 4 patients underwent open procedures for the same pathology. The surgical indication with the same criteria was restrictive: at least 2 acute episodes had occurred that were treated with hospital admission and that were separated by an adequate period (2 months) of medical therapy. RESULTS: No conversions of laparoscopy to an open procedure were necessary. Age, sex, weight, morbidity, and mortality were similar between the 2 groups. Operative time was 180 minutes for laparoscopy and 120 minutes for laparotomy. Postoperative resumption of peristalsis was 24 hours versus 4 days, resumption of alimentation was on the second postoperative day versus the fifth postoperative day, and hospital stay was 7 days versus 12 days for laparoscopy and laparotomy, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows the feasibility and the advantages of elective laparoscopic-assisted colonic re-section for uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis. The advantages of the laparoscopic approach are the lower need for analgesics and the more precocious ambulation, canalization, resumption of alimentation, and the shorter hospital stay.
format Text
id pubmed-3015656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30156562011-02-17 Elective Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy for Sigmoid Diverticulitis Neri, Vincenzo Ambrosi, Antonio Di Lauro, Giuseppe Valentino, Tiziano Pio JSLS Scientific Papers OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis and to assess its postoperative advantages. METHODS: From 1999 to 2001, 5 patients were selectively operated on with a laparoscopic-assisted procedure for uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis. In the preceding period (September 1997 through December 1998), 4 patients underwent open procedures for the same pathology. The surgical indication with the same criteria was restrictive: at least 2 acute episodes had occurred that were treated with hospital admission and that were separated by an adequate period (2 months) of medical therapy. RESULTS: No conversions of laparoscopy to an open procedure were necessary. Age, sex, weight, morbidity, and mortality were similar between the 2 groups. Operative time was 180 minutes for laparoscopy and 120 minutes for laparotomy. Postoperative resumption of peristalsis was 24 hours versus 4 days, resumption of alimentation was on the second postoperative day versus the fifth postoperative day, and hospital stay was 7 days versus 12 days for laparoscopy and laparotomy, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows the feasibility and the advantages of elective laparoscopic-assisted colonic re-section for uncomplicated sigmoid diverticulitis. The advantages of the laparoscopic approach are the lower need for analgesics and the more precocious ambulation, canalization, resumption of alimentation, and the shorter hospital stay. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2006 /pmc/articles/PMC3015656/ /pubmed/16709361 Text en © 2006 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Neri, Vincenzo
Ambrosi, Antonio
Di Lauro, Giuseppe
Valentino, Tiziano Pio
Elective Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy for Sigmoid Diverticulitis
title Elective Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy for Sigmoid Diverticulitis
title_full Elective Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy for Sigmoid Diverticulitis
title_fullStr Elective Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy for Sigmoid Diverticulitis
title_full_unstemmed Elective Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy for Sigmoid Diverticulitis
title_short Elective Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy for Sigmoid Diverticulitis
title_sort elective laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16709361
work_keys_str_mv AT nerivincenzo electivelaparoscopicassistedcolectomyforsigmoiddiverticulitis
AT ambrosiantonio electivelaparoscopicassistedcolectomyforsigmoiddiverticulitis
AT dilaurogiuseppe electivelaparoscopicassistedcolectomyforsigmoiddiverticulitis
AT valentinotizianopio electivelaparoscopicassistedcolectomyforsigmoiddiverticulitis