Cargando…

L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated our experience with laparoscopic L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). METHODS: This represents a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent L5-S1 laparoscopic ALIF between February 1998 and August 2003. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent L5-S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frantzides, Constantine T., Zeni, Tallal M., Phillips, Frank M., Mathur, Sameer, Zografakis, John G., Moore, Ronald M., Laguna, Luis E.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17575763
_version_ 1782195591504199680
author Frantzides, Constantine T.
Zeni, Tallal M.
Phillips, Frank M.
Mathur, Sameer
Zografakis, John G.
Moore, Ronald M.
Laguna, Luis E.
author_facet Frantzides, Constantine T.
Zeni, Tallal M.
Phillips, Frank M.
Mathur, Sameer
Zografakis, John G.
Moore, Ronald M.
Laguna, Luis E.
author_sort Frantzides, Constantine T.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We evaluated our experience with laparoscopic L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). METHODS: This represents a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent L5-S1 laparoscopic ALIF between February 1998 and August 2003. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent L5-S1 LAIF (15 males and 13 females). The mean age was 43 years (range, 26 to 67). Mean operative time was 225 minutes (range, 137 to 309 minutes). No conversions to an open procedure were necessary. Twenty-four (85.7%) patients underwent successful bilateral cage placement. Four patients (14.3%) in whom only a single cage could be placed underwent supplementary posterior pedicle screw placement. Mean length of stay (LOS) was 4.1 days (range, 2 to 15). Two patients underwent reoperation subacutely secondary to symptomatic lateral displacement of the cage. One patient developed radiculopathy 6 months postoperatively and required reoperation. One patient developed a small bowel obstruction secondary to adhesions to the cage requiring laparoscopic reoperation. Fusion was achieved in all patients. Visual analogue scale scores for back pain were significantly improved from 8.6±0.8 to 2.8±0.8 (P<0.0001) at 1 year. CONCLUSION: L5-S1 LAIF is feasible and safe with all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Fusion rates and pain improvement were comparable to those with an open repair.
format Text
id pubmed-3015738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30157382011-02-17 L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion Frantzides, Constantine T. Zeni, Tallal M. Phillips, Frank M. Mathur, Sameer Zografakis, John G. Moore, Ronald M. Laguna, Luis E. JSLS Scientific Papers OBJECTIVE: We evaluated our experience with laparoscopic L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). METHODS: This represents a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent L5-S1 laparoscopic ALIF between February 1998 and August 2003. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent L5-S1 LAIF (15 males and 13 females). The mean age was 43 years (range, 26 to 67). Mean operative time was 225 minutes (range, 137 to 309 minutes). No conversions to an open procedure were necessary. Twenty-four (85.7%) patients underwent successful bilateral cage placement. Four patients (14.3%) in whom only a single cage could be placed underwent supplementary posterior pedicle screw placement. Mean length of stay (LOS) was 4.1 days (range, 2 to 15). Two patients underwent reoperation subacutely secondary to symptomatic lateral displacement of the cage. One patient developed radiculopathy 6 months postoperatively and required reoperation. One patient developed a small bowel obstruction secondary to adhesions to the cage requiring laparoscopic reoperation. Fusion was achieved in all patients. Visual analogue scale scores for back pain were significantly improved from 8.6±0.8 to 2.8±0.8 (P<0.0001) at 1 year. CONCLUSION: L5-S1 LAIF is feasible and safe with all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Fusion rates and pain improvement were comparable to those with an open repair. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2006 /pmc/articles/PMC3015738/ /pubmed/17575763 Text en © 2006 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Frantzides, Constantine T.
Zeni, Tallal M.
Phillips, Frank M.
Mathur, Sameer
Zografakis, John G.
Moore, Ronald M.
Laguna, Luis E.
L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion
title L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion
title_full L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion
title_fullStr L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion
title_full_unstemmed L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion
title_short L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion
title_sort l5-s1 laparoscopic anterior interbody fusion
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17575763
work_keys_str_mv AT frantzidesconstantinet l5s1laparoscopicanteriorinterbodyfusion
AT zenitallalm l5s1laparoscopicanteriorinterbodyfusion
AT phillipsfrankm l5s1laparoscopicanteriorinterbodyfusion
AT mathursameer l5s1laparoscopicanteriorinterbodyfusion
AT zografakisjohng l5s1laparoscopicanteriorinterbodyfusion
AT mooreronaldm l5s1laparoscopicanteriorinterbodyfusion
AT lagunaluise l5s1laparoscopicanteriorinterbodyfusion