Cargando…
L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated our experience with laparoscopic L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). METHODS: This represents a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent L5-S1 laparoscopic ALIF between February 1998 and August 2003. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent L5-S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17575763 |
_version_ | 1782195591504199680 |
---|---|
author | Frantzides, Constantine T. Zeni, Tallal M. Phillips, Frank M. Mathur, Sameer Zografakis, John G. Moore, Ronald M. Laguna, Luis E. |
author_facet | Frantzides, Constantine T. Zeni, Tallal M. Phillips, Frank M. Mathur, Sameer Zografakis, John G. Moore, Ronald M. Laguna, Luis E. |
author_sort | Frantzides, Constantine T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We evaluated our experience with laparoscopic L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). METHODS: This represents a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent L5-S1 laparoscopic ALIF between February 1998 and August 2003. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent L5-S1 LAIF (15 males and 13 females). The mean age was 43 years (range, 26 to 67). Mean operative time was 225 minutes (range, 137 to 309 minutes). No conversions to an open procedure were necessary. Twenty-four (85.7%) patients underwent successful bilateral cage placement. Four patients (14.3%) in whom only a single cage could be placed underwent supplementary posterior pedicle screw placement. Mean length of stay (LOS) was 4.1 days (range, 2 to 15). Two patients underwent reoperation subacutely secondary to symptomatic lateral displacement of the cage. One patient developed radiculopathy 6 months postoperatively and required reoperation. One patient developed a small bowel obstruction secondary to adhesions to the cage requiring laparoscopic reoperation. Fusion was achieved in all patients. Visual analogue scale scores for back pain were significantly improved from 8.6±0.8 to 2.8±0.8 (P<0.0001) at 1 year. CONCLUSION: L5-S1 LAIF is feasible and safe with all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Fusion rates and pain improvement were comparable to those with an open repair. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3015738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30157382011-02-17 L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion Frantzides, Constantine T. Zeni, Tallal M. Phillips, Frank M. Mathur, Sameer Zografakis, John G. Moore, Ronald M. Laguna, Luis E. JSLS Scientific Papers OBJECTIVE: We evaluated our experience with laparoscopic L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). METHODS: This represents a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent L5-S1 laparoscopic ALIF between February 1998 and August 2003. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent L5-S1 LAIF (15 males and 13 females). The mean age was 43 years (range, 26 to 67). Mean operative time was 225 minutes (range, 137 to 309 minutes). No conversions to an open procedure were necessary. Twenty-four (85.7%) patients underwent successful bilateral cage placement. Four patients (14.3%) in whom only a single cage could be placed underwent supplementary posterior pedicle screw placement. Mean length of stay (LOS) was 4.1 days (range, 2 to 15). Two patients underwent reoperation subacutely secondary to symptomatic lateral displacement of the cage. One patient developed radiculopathy 6 months postoperatively and required reoperation. One patient developed a small bowel obstruction secondary to adhesions to the cage requiring laparoscopic reoperation. Fusion was achieved in all patients. Visual analogue scale scores for back pain were significantly improved from 8.6±0.8 to 2.8±0.8 (P<0.0001) at 1 year. CONCLUSION: L5-S1 LAIF is feasible and safe with all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Fusion rates and pain improvement were comparable to those with an open repair. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2006 /pmc/articles/PMC3015738/ /pubmed/17575763 Text en © 2006 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Frantzides, Constantine T. Zeni, Tallal M. Phillips, Frank M. Mathur, Sameer Zografakis, John G. Moore, Ronald M. Laguna, Luis E. L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion |
title | L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion |
title_full | L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion |
title_fullStr | L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion |
title_full_unstemmed | L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion |
title_short | L5-S1 Laparoscopic Anterior Interbody Fusion |
title_sort | l5-s1 laparoscopic anterior interbody fusion |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17575763 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frantzidesconstantinet l5s1laparoscopicanteriorinterbodyfusion AT zenitallalm l5s1laparoscopicanteriorinterbodyfusion AT phillipsfrankm l5s1laparoscopicanteriorinterbodyfusion AT mathursameer l5s1laparoscopicanteriorinterbodyfusion AT zografakisjohng l5s1laparoscopicanteriorinterbodyfusion AT mooreronaldm l5s1laparoscopicanteriorinterbodyfusion AT lagunaluise l5s1laparoscopicanteriorinterbodyfusion |