Cargando…

Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Patients With a Body Mass Index of 25 or Greater: Results of a Double Blind, Prospective, Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND: The reported advantages of the laparoscopic approach to appendectomy are shortened hospital stay, less postoperative pain, and earlier return to usual activities (work). However, a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy in a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ricca, Robert, Schneider, James J., Brar, Harpreet, Lucha, Paul A.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17663093
_version_ 1782195604888223744
author Ricca, Robert
Schneider, James J.
Brar, Harpreet
Lucha, Paul A.
author_facet Ricca, Robert
Schneider, James J.
Brar, Harpreet
Lucha, Paul A.
author_sort Ricca, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The reported advantages of the laparoscopic approach to appendectomy are shortened hospital stay, less postoperative pain, and earlier return to usual activities (work). However, a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy in active-duty males failed to disclose a benefit of laparoscopic appendectomy with regards to postoperative pain and return to work. The aim of our study was to compare open and laparoscopic appendectomy in overweight patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to determine whether laparoscopic appendectomy or the open procedure in overweight patients offers a significant reduction in lost workdays, postoperative pain, or operative time from. Open appendectomy in overweight patients (those with a body mass index ≥25) may be more difficult due to excessive sub-cutaneous adipose tissue. The open incision may be of considerable size, which may result in increased postoperative pain and a prolonged convalescence. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in operative time for laparoscopic appendectomy of 11 minutes. As expected, the aggregate incision length for open appendectomy was twice that of the laparoscopic appendectomy. CONCLUSION: The data from this prospective, randomized, double-blind study failed to demonstrate any significant reduction in lost workdays, postoperative pain, or operative time with laparoscopic appendectomy.
format Text
id pubmed-3015793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30157932011-02-17 Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Patients With a Body Mass Index of 25 or Greater: Results of a Double Blind, Prospective, Randomized Trial Ricca, Robert Schneider, James J. Brar, Harpreet Lucha, Paul A. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND: The reported advantages of the laparoscopic approach to appendectomy are shortened hospital stay, less postoperative pain, and earlier return to usual activities (work). However, a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy in active-duty males failed to disclose a benefit of laparoscopic appendectomy with regards to postoperative pain and return to work. The aim of our study was to compare open and laparoscopic appendectomy in overweight patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to determine whether laparoscopic appendectomy or the open procedure in overweight patients offers a significant reduction in lost workdays, postoperative pain, or operative time from. Open appendectomy in overweight patients (those with a body mass index ≥25) may be more difficult due to excessive sub-cutaneous adipose tissue. The open incision may be of considerable size, which may result in increased postoperative pain and a prolonged convalescence. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in operative time for laparoscopic appendectomy of 11 minutes. As expected, the aggregate incision length for open appendectomy was twice that of the laparoscopic appendectomy. CONCLUSION: The data from this prospective, randomized, double-blind study failed to demonstrate any significant reduction in lost workdays, postoperative pain, or operative time with laparoscopic appendectomy. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC3015793/ /pubmed/17663093 Text en © 2007 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Ricca, Robert
Schneider, James J.
Brar, Harpreet
Lucha, Paul A.
Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Patients With a Body Mass Index of 25 or Greater: Results of a Double Blind, Prospective, Randomized Trial
title Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Patients With a Body Mass Index of 25 or Greater: Results of a Double Blind, Prospective, Randomized Trial
title_full Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Patients With a Body Mass Index of 25 or Greater: Results of a Double Blind, Prospective, Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Patients With a Body Mass Index of 25 or Greater: Results of a Double Blind, Prospective, Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Patients With a Body Mass Index of 25 or Greater: Results of a Double Blind, Prospective, Randomized Trial
title_short Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Patients With a Body Mass Index of 25 or Greater: Results of a Double Blind, Prospective, Randomized Trial
title_sort laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with a body mass index of 25 or greater: results of a double blind, prospective, randomized trial
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17663093
work_keys_str_mv AT riccarobert laparoscopicappendectomyinpatientswithabodymassindexof25orgreaterresultsofadoubleblindprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT schneiderjamesj laparoscopicappendectomyinpatientswithabodymassindexof25orgreaterresultsofadoubleblindprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT brarharpreet laparoscopicappendectomyinpatientswithabodymassindexof25orgreaterresultsofadoubleblindprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT luchapaula laparoscopicappendectomyinpatientswithabodymassindexof25orgreaterresultsofadoubleblindprospectiverandomizedtrial