Cargando…

257 Incidental Appendectomies During Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective observational report analyzes the demographics, blood loss, length of surgical duration, number of days in the hospital, and complications for 821 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy over a 11-year period stratified by incidental appendectomy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Hanlan, Katherine A., Fisher, Deidre T., O'Holleran, Michael S.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18237505
_version_ 1782195623206846464
author O'Hanlan, Katherine A.
Fisher, Deidre T.
O'Holleran, Michael S.
author_facet O'Hanlan, Katherine A.
Fisher, Deidre T.
O'Holleran, Michael S.
author_sort O'Hanlan, Katherine A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This retrospective observational report analyzes the demographics, blood loss, length of surgical duration, number of days in the hospital, and complications for 821 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy over a 11-year period stratified by incidental appendectomy. METHODS: A retrospective chart abstraction was performed. ANOVA and chi-square tests were performed with significance preset at P<0.05. RESULTS: Of 821 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy, 257 underwent elective appendectomy with the ultrasonic scalpel, either as part of their staging, treatment for pelvic pain, or prophylaxis against appendicitis. Comparing the 2 groups, no difference existed in mean age of 50±10 years or mean BMI of 27.6±6.7. Both groups had a similar mean blood loss of 130 mL. Surgery took less time (137 vs 118 minutes, P<0.0012) and the hospital stay was shorter in the appendectomy group (1.5 vs 1.2, P<0.0001) possibly because it was performed incidentally in most cases. No complications were attributable to the appendectomy, and complication types and rates in both groups were similar. Though all appendicies appeared normal, pathology was documented in 9%, including 3 carcinoid tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental appendectomy during total laparoscopic hysterectomy is not associated with significant risk and can be routinely offered to patients planning elective gynecologic laparoscopic procedures, as is standard for open procedures.
format Text
id pubmed-3015857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30158572011-02-17 257 Incidental Appendectomies During Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy O'Hanlan, Katherine A. Fisher, Deidre T. O'Holleran, Michael S. JSLS Scientific Papers OBJECTIVE: This retrospective observational report analyzes the demographics, blood loss, length of surgical duration, number of days in the hospital, and complications for 821 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy over a 11-year period stratified by incidental appendectomy. METHODS: A retrospective chart abstraction was performed. ANOVA and chi-square tests were performed with significance preset at P<0.05. RESULTS: Of 821 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy, 257 underwent elective appendectomy with the ultrasonic scalpel, either as part of their staging, treatment for pelvic pain, or prophylaxis against appendicitis. Comparing the 2 groups, no difference existed in mean age of 50±10 years or mean BMI of 27.6±6.7. Both groups had a similar mean blood loss of 130 mL. Surgery took less time (137 vs 118 minutes, P<0.0012) and the hospital stay was shorter in the appendectomy group (1.5 vs 1.2, P<0.0001) possibly because it was performed incidentally in most cases. No complications were attributable to the appendectomy, and complication types and rates in both groups were similar. Though all appendicies appeared normal, pathology was documented in 9%, including 3 carcinoid tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental appendectomy during total laparoscopic hysterectomy is not associated with significant risk and can be routinely offered to patients planning elective gynecologic laparoscopic procedures, as is standard for open procedures. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC3015857/ /pubmed/18237505 Text en © 2007 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
O'Hanlan, Katherine A.
Fisher, Deidre T.
O'Holleran, Michael S.
257 Incidental Appendectomies During Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
title 257 Incidental Appendectomies During Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
title_full 257 Incidental Appendectomies During Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
title_fullStr 257 Incidental Appendectomies During Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
title_full_unstemmed 257 Incidental Appendectomies During Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
title_short 257 Incidental Appendectomies During Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
title_sort 257 incidental appendectomies during total laparoscopic hysterectomy
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18237505
work_keys_str_mv AT ohanlankatherinea 257incidentalappendectomiesduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy
AT fisherdeidret 257incidentalappendectomiesduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy
AT oholleranmichaels 257incidentalappendectomiesduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy