Cargando…
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience
OBJECTIVE: To compare robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) with a matched control group of standard laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all RALH was performed. All cases were compared with a matched control group of standard LH. Comparisons were base...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19660202 |
_version_ | 1782195640963432448 |
---|---|
author | Nezhat, Camran Lavie, Ofer Lemyre, Madeleine Gemer, Ofer Bhagan, Lisa Nezhat, Ceana |
author_facet | Nezhat, Camran Lavie, Ofer Lemyre, Madeleine Gemer, Ofer Bhagan, Lisa Nezhat, Ceana |
author_sort | Nezhat, Camran |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) with a matched control group of standard laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all RALH was performed. All cases were compared with a matched control group of standard LH. Comparisons were based on Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, and exact chi-square tests. RESULTS: Between January 2006 and August 2007, 26 consecutive RALH were performed (10 with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy). These were compared with 50 matched control standard LH (22 with bilateral salpingooophorectomy). The 2 groups were matched by age (P=0.49), body mass index (P=0.25), gravidity (P=0.11), previous abdomino-pelvic surgery (P=0.37), and size of the excised uterus (P=0.72). Mean surgical time for RALH was 276 minutes (range, 150 to 440) compared with 206 minutes (range, 110 to 420) for standard LH (P=0.01). Blood loss, hospitalization length, and postoperative complications were not significantly different. No conversion to laparotomy was reported in either group. CONCLUSION: Robotic technology was successfully used for hysterectomy with a similar surgical outcome to that of standard LH. This technology offers exciting potential applications, especially for remote telesurgery, and to facilitate teaching of endoscopic surgery. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3015924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30159242011-02-17 Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience Nezhat, Camran Lavie, Ofer Lemyre, Madeleine Gemer, Ofer Bhagan, Lisa Nezhat, Ceana JSLS Scientific Papers OBJECTIVE: To compare robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) with a matched control group of standard laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all RALH was performed. All cases were compared with a matched control group of standard LH. Comparisons were based on Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, and exact chi-square tests. RESULTS: Between January 2006 and August 2007, 26 consecutive RALH were performed (10 with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy). These were compared with 50 matched control standard LH (22 with bilateral salpingooophorectomy). The 2 groups were matched by age (P=0.49), body mass index (P=0.25), gravidity (P=0.11), previous abdomino-pelvic surgery (P=0.37), and size of the excised uterus (P=0.72). Mean surgical time for RALH was 276 minutes (range, 150 to 440) compared with 206 minutes (range, 110 to 420) for standard LH (P=0.01). Blood loss, hospitalization length, and postoperative complications were not significantly different. No conversion to laparotomy was reported in either group. CONCLUSION: Robotic technology was successfully used for hysterectomy with a similar surgical outcome to that of standard LH. This technology offers exciting potential applications, especially for remote telesurgery, and to facilitate teaching of endoscopic surgery. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC3015924/ /pubmed/19660202 Text en © 2009 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Nezhat, Camran Lavie, Ofer Lemyre, Madeleine Gemer, Ofer Bhagan, Lisa Nezhat, Ceana Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience |
title | Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience |
title_full | Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience |
title_short | Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience |
title_sort | laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without a robot: stanford experience |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19660202 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nezhatcamran laparoscopichysterectomywithandwithoutarobotstanfordexperience AT lavieofer laparoscopichysterectomywithandwithoutarobotstanfordexperience AT lemyremadeleine laparoscopichysterectomywithandwithoutarobotstanfordexperience AT gemerofer laparoscopichysterectomywithandwithoutarobotstanfordexperience AT bhaganlisa laparoscopichysterectomywithandwithoutarobotstanfordexperience AT nezhatceana laparoscopichysterectomywithandwithoutarobotstanfordexperience |