Cargando…

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience

OBJECTIVE: To compare robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) with a matched control group of standard laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all RALH was performed. All cases were compared with a matched control group of standard LH. Comparisons were base...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nezhat, Camran, Lavie, Ofer, Lemyre, Madeleine, Gemer, Ofer, Bhagan, Lisa, Nezhat, Ceana
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19660202
_version_ 1782195640963432448
author Nezhat, Camran
Lavie, Ofer
Lemyre, Madeleine
Gemer, Ofer
Bhagan, Lisa
Nezhat, Ceana
author_facet Nezhat, Camran
Lavie, Ofer
Lemyre, Madeleine
Gemer, Ofer
Bhagan, Lisa
Nezhat, Ceana
author_sort Nezhat, Camran
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) with a matched control group of standard laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all RALH was performed. All cases were compared with a matched control group of standard LH. Comparisons were based on Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, and exact chi-square tests. RESULTS: Between January 2006 and August 2007, 26 consecutive RALH were performed (10 with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy). These were compared with 50 matched control standard LH (22 with bilateral salpingooophorectomy). The 2 groups were matched by age (P=0.49), body mass index (P=0.25), gravidity (P=0.11), previous abdomino-pelvic surgery (P=0.37), and size of the excised uterus (P=0.72). Mean surgical time for RALH was 276 minutes (range, 150 to 440) compared with 206 minutes (range, 110 to 420) for standard LH (P=0.01). Blood loss, hospitalization length, and postoperative complications were not significantly different. No conversion to laparotomy was reported in either group. CONCLUSION: Robotic technology was successfully used for hysterectomy with a similar surgical outcome to that of standard LH. This technology offers exciting potential applications, especially for remote telesurgery, and to facilitate teaching of endoscopic surgery.
format Text
id pubmed-3015924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30159242011-02-17 Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience Nezhat, Camran Lavie, Ofer Lemyre, Madeleine Gemer, Ofer Bhagan, Lisa Nezhat, Ceana JSLS Scientific Papers OBJECTIVE: To compare robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH) with a matched control group of standard laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all RALH was performed. All cases were compared with a matched control group of standard LH. Comparisons were based on Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, and exact chi-square tests. RESULTS: Between January 2006 and August 2007, 26 consecutive RALH were performed (10 with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy). These were compared with 50 matched control standard LH (22 with bilateral salpingooophorectomy). The 2 groups were matched by age (P=0.49), body mass index (P=0.25), gravidity (P=0.11), previous abdomino-pelvic surgery (P=0.37), and size of the excised uterus (P=0.72). Mean surgical time for RALH was 276 minutes (range, 150 to 440) compared with 206 minutes (range, 110 to 420) for standard LH (P=0.01). Blood loss, hospitalization length, and postoperative complications were not significantly different. No conversion to laparotomy was reported in either group. CONCLUSION: Robotic technology was successfully used for hysterectomy with a similar surgical outcome to that of standard LH. This technology offers exciting potential applications, especially for remote telesurgery, and to facilitate teaching of endoscopic surgery. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC3015924/ /pubmed/19660202 Text en © 2009 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Nezhat, Camran
Lavie, Ofer
Lemyre, Madeleine
Gemer, Ofer
Bhagan, Lisa
Nezhat, Ceana
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience
title Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience
title_full Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience
title_short Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with and without a Robot: Stanford Experience
title_sort laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without a robot: stanford experience
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19660202
work_keys_str_mv AT nezhatcamran laparoscopichysterectomywithandwithoutarobotstanfordexperience
AT lavieofer laparoscopichysterectomywithandwithoutarobotstanfordexperience
AT lemyremadeleine laparoscopichysterectomywithandwithoutarobotstanfordexperience
AT gemerofer laparoscopichysterectomywithandwithoutarobotstanfordexperience
AT bhaganlisa laparoscopichysterectomywithandwithoutarobotstanfordexperience
AT nezhatceana laparoscopichysterectomywithandwithoutarobotstanfordexperience