Cargando…

Expanding the Indications for Laparoscopic Gastric Resection for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic resection of large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has been controversial. This generally has been limited to small lesions. We hypothesize that laparoscopic mobilization and resection using, in some cases, extracorporeal anastomosis of the gastrointestinal (GI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sokolich, Julio, Galanopoulos, Christos, Dunn, Ernest, Linder, Jeffrey D., Jeyarajah, D. Rohan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19660210
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic resection of large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has been controversial. This generally has been limited to small lesions. We hypothesize that laparoscopic mobilization and resection using, in some cases, extracorporeal anastomosis of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is an oncologically safe alternative to open surgery even when tumors are large. METHODS: Four patients underwent a laparoscopic approach for gastric GIST tumors >2 cm at Methodist Dallas Medical Center over a 6-month period. Patient demographics, operative findings, postoperative course, and pathologic characteristics were examined. RESULTS: The mean age in this patient group was 58 years (range, 36 to 77). Gastrointestinal bleeding and dyspepsia were the most common symptoms. Seventy-five percent of the patients were females. Mean tumor size was 10 cm (range, 2.5 to 20) with distribution in the stomach as follows: 75% greater curvature and 25% antrum. Tumors were removed by wedge, sleeve, and partial gastrectomies. Two of these tumors showed a high grade and the other 2 a moderate grade of differentiation. The number of mitoses was <5/50 HPF in all the tumors. No intraoperative spillage occurred in any patients, even with the largest tumor (20 cm). Importantly, all tumors were excised with a negative gross and microscopic margin. Average length of stay was 4 days. No patients required reoperation, and there were no complications postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive assisted approaches may be an option to treat large GIST tumors. Obeying principles of minimal touch, no spillage, and obtaining a negative margin, a safe operation with a laparoscopic approach is feasible, even in giant tumors. The large size of diagnosed GIST tumors should not preclude a minimally invasive approach.