Cargando…
Laparoscopic Doppler Technology in Laparoscopic Renal Surgery
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic Doppler technology has previously been reported to help identify vasculature during laparoscopy. Recently, we published our initial experience with this technology during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, laparoscopic partial n...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19793484 |
_version_ | 1782195653260083200 |
---|---|
author | Perlmutter, Mark A. Hyams, Elias S. Stifelman, Michael D. |
author_facet | Perlmutter, Mark A. Hyams, Elias S. Stifelman, Michael D. |
author_sort | Perlmutter, Mark A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic Doppler technology has previously been reported to help identify vasculature during laparoscopy. Recently, we published our initial experience with this technology during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. We now present a prospective, pilot evaluation of the Doppler probe for these procedures. METHODS: A laparoscopic Doppler probe was used in the above laparoscopic renal surgeries in 50 patients. Anatomic findings, Doppler survey time, dissection time, operative time, estimated blood loss, changes in management, subjective time saved/utility, technical difficulties, clinical complications, and ease of use were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Mean Doppler survey time was 1.77 minutes. Mean hilar dissection time was 9.25 minutes. Eight accessory vessels were not seen on preoperative imaging in 7 patients (17%). In 3 cases of RALP, Doppler rectified preoperative imaging in detecting a crossing vessel. The probe altered management in 16% of patients, subjectively saved time in 78% of patients, and had 100% concordance with dissection. There were no complications but 2 technical failures. CONCLUSION: The probe is quick, safe, easy to use, and has perfect concordance with surgical dissection. Randomized comparison with and without Doppler assistance is necessary to confirm the utility of this technology. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3015969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30159692011-02-17 Laparoscopic Doppler Technology in Laparoscopic Renal Surgery Perlmutter, Mark A. Hyams, Elias S. Stifelman, Michael D. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic Doppler technology has previously been reported to help identify vasculature during laparoscopy. Recently, we published our initial experience with this technology during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. We now present a prospective, pilot evaluation of the Doppler probe for these procedures. METHODS: A laparoscopic Doppler probe was used in the above laparoscopic renal surgeries in 50 patients. Anatomic findings, Doppler survey time, dissection time, operative time, estimated blood loss, changes in management, subjective time saved/utility, technical difficulties, clinical complications, and ease of use were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Mean Doppler survey time was 1.77 minutes. Mean hilar dissection time was 9.25 minutes. Eight accessory vessels were not seen on preoperative imaging in 7 patients (17%). In 3 cases of RALP, Doppler rectified preoperative imaging in detecting a crossing vessel. The probe altered management in 16% of patients, subjectively saved time in 78% of patients, and had 100% concordance with dissection. There were no complications but 2 technical failures. CONCLUSION: The probe is quick, safe, easy to use, and has perfect concordance with surgical dissection. Randomized comparison with and without Doppler assistance is necessary to confirm the utility of this technology. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC3015969/ /pubmed/19793484 Text en © 2009 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Perlmutter, Mark A. Hyams, Elias S. Stifelman, Michael D. Laparoscopic Doppler Technology in Laparoscopic Renal Surgery |
title | Laparoscopic Doppler Technology in Laparoscopic Renal Surgery |
title_full | Laparoscopic Doppler Technology in Laparoscopic Renal Surgery |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Doppler Technology in Laparoscopic Renal Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Doppler Technology in Laparoscopic Renal Surgery |
title_short | Laparoscopic Doppler Technology in Laparoscopic Renal Surgery |
title_sort | laparoscopic doppler technology in laparoscopic renal surgery |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19793484 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perlmuttermarka laparoscopicdopplertechnologyinlaparoscopicrenalsurgery AT hyamseliass laparoscopicdopplertechnologyinlaparoscopicrenalsurgery AT stifelmanmichaeld laparoscopicdopplertechnologyinlaparoscopicrenalsurgery |