Cargando…
The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has a low risk for infectious complications, but many surgeons still use prophylactic antibiotics. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the necessity and test the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics on postoperative in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19793473 |
_version_ | 1782195653496012800 |
---|---|
author | Uludag, Mehmet Yetkin, Gurkan Citgez, Bulent |
author_facet | Uludag, Mehmet Yetkin, Gurkan Citgez, Bulent |
author_sort | Uludag, Mehmet |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has a low risk for infectious complications, but many surgeons still use prophylactic antibiotics. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the necessity and test the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics on postoperative infection complications in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Low-risk patients were randomly placed into 2 groups: 68 patients (group 1) received cefazolin 1g intravenously after induction of anesthesia, and 76 patients (group 2) were not given prophylactic antibiotics. In both groups, septic complications were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Positive bile culture and gallbladder rupture did not significantly increase the rate of surgical site infections. In group 1, there were 3 (4.41%) cases of wound infection, 3 (4.41%) cases of pulmonary infections, and 1 (1.47%) case of urinary tract infection. In group 2, there were 2 (2.63%) cases of wound infection, 2 (2.63%) case of pulmonary infections, and 3 (3.95%) cases of urinary tract infection. No significant difference existed in the complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data, the use of prophylactic antibiotics does not decrease the rate of postoperative infection complications and surgical-site infections and is not necessary in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3015970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30159702011-02-17 The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Uludag, Mehmet Yetkin, Gurkan Citgez, Bulent JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has a low risk for infectious complications, but many surgeons still use prophylactic antibiotics. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the necessity and test the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics on postoperative infection complications in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Low-risk patients were randomly placed into 2 groups: 68 patients (group 1) received cefazolin 1g intravenously after induction of anesthesia, and 76 patients (group 2) were not given prophylactic antibiotics. In both groups, septic complications were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Positive bile culture and gallbladder rupture did not significantly increase the rate of surgical site infections. In group 1, there were 3 (4.41%) cases of wound infection, 3 (4.41%) cases of pulmonary infections, and 1 (1.47%) case of urinary tract infection. In group 2, there were 2 (2.63%) cases of wound infection, 2 (2.63%) case of pulmonary infections, and 3 (3.95%) cases of urinary tract infection. No significant difference existed in the complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data, the use of prophylactic antibiotics does not decrease the rate of postoperative infection complications and surgical-site infections and is not necessary in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC3015970/ /pubmed/19793473 Text en © 2009 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Uludag, Mehmet Yetkin, Gurkan Citgez, Bulent The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title | The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_full | The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_fullStr | The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_short | The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_sort | role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19793473 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uludagmehmet theroleofprophylacticantibioticsinelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT yetkingurkan theroleofprophylacticantibioticsinelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT citgezbulent theroleofprophylacticantibioticsinelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT uludagmehmet roleofprophylacticantibioticsinelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT yetkingurkan roleofprophylacticantibioticsinelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT citgezbulent roleofprophylacticantibioticsinelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy |