Cargando…

The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has a low risk for infectious complications, but many surgeons still use prophylactic antibiotics. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the necessity and test the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics on postoperative in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uludag, Mehmet, Yetkin, Gurkan, Citgez, Bulent
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19793473
_version_ 1782195653496012800
author Uludag, Mehmet
Yetkin, Gurkan
Citgez, Bulent
author_facet Uludag, Mehmet
Yetkin, Gurkan
Citgez, Bulent
author_sort Uludag, Mehmet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has a low risk for infectious complications, but many surgeons still use prophylactic antibiotics. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the necessity and test the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics on postoperative infection complications in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Low-risk patients were randomly placed into 2 groups: 68 patients (group 1) received cefazolin 1g intravenously after induction of anesthesia, and 76 patients (group 2) were not given prophylactic antibiotics. In both groups, septic complications were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Positive bile culture and gallbladder rupture did not significantly increase the rate of surgical site infections. In group 1, there were 3 (4.41%) cases of wound infection, 3 (4.41%) cases of pulmonary infections, and 1 (1.47%) case of urinary tract infection. In group 2, there were 2 (2.63%) cases of wound infection, 2 (2.63%) case of pulmonary infections, and 3 (3.95%) cases of urinary tract infection. No significant difference existed in the complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data, the use of prophylactic antibiotics does not decrease the rate of postoperative infection complications and surgical-site infections and is not necessary in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
format Text
id pubmed-3015970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30159702011-02-17 The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Uludag, Mehmet Yetkin, Gurkan Citgez, Bulent JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy has a low risk for infectious complications, but many surgeons still use prophylactic antibiotics. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the necessity and test the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics on postoperative infection complications in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Low-risk patients were randomly placed into 2 groups: 68 patients (group 1) received cefazolin 1g intravenously after induction of anesthesia, and 76 patients (group 2) were not given prophylactic antibiotics. In both groups, septic complications were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Positive bile culture and gallbladder rupture did not significantly increase the rate of surgical site infections. In group 1, there were 3 (4.41%) cases of wound infection, 3 (4.41%) cases of pulmonary infections, and 1 (1.47%) case of urinary tract infection. In group 2, there were 2 (2.63%) cases of wound infection, 2 (2.63%) case of pulmonary infections, and 3 (3.95%) cases of urinary tract infection. No significant difference existed in the complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data, the use of prophylactic antibiotics does not decrease the rate of postoperative infection complications and surgical-site infections and is not necessary in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC3015970/ /pubmed/19793473 Text en © 2009 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Uludag, Mehmet
Yetkin, Gurkan
Citgez, Bulent
The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_full The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_fullStr The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_short The Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_sort role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3015970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19793473
work_keys_str_mv AT uludagmehmet theroleofprophylacticantibioticsinelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT yetkingurkan theroleofprophylacticantibioticsinelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT citgezbulent theroleofprophylacticantibioticsinelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT uludagmehmet roleofprophylacticantibioticsinelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT yetkingurkan roleofprophylacticantibioticsinelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT citgezbulent roleofprophylacticantibioticsinelectivelaparoscopiccholecystectomy