Cargando…

Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate a new electrosurgical instrument (Lap Loop device) that amputates the uterine corpus from the cervix during a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) and to compare the time required for cervical amputation with traditional methods. METHODS: This comparative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pasic, Resad, Abdelmonem, Allam, Levine, Ronald
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882425
_version_ 1782195670326706176
author Pasic, Resad
Abdelmonem, Allam
Levine, Ronald
author_facet Pasic, Resad
Abdelmonem, Allam
Levine, Ronald
author_sort Pasic, Resad
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate a new electrosurgical instrument (Lap Loop device) that amputates the uterine corpus from the cervix during a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) and to compare the time required for cervical amputation with traditional methods. METHODS: This comparative trial was conducted at the University of Louisville and Norton Healthcare Hospitals, Louisville, KY. The patients comprised 29 women scheduled for hysterectomy for benign conditions. All patients underwent laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. The Lap Loop device was used in 17 patients to section the cervix. Conventional methods with either laparoscopic monopolar scissors or Harmonic scalpel were used in 12 patients. RESULTS: In the control group, the mean cervical cutting time with laparoscopic scissors or Harmonic scalpel was 14.4 minutes. The mean time for the application of the loop electrode and cutting time was 6.6 minutes and was significantly shorter than the cutting time of conventional methods. Two minor complications (7.4% of cases) and one relatively major complication (3.7%), an incisional hernia, occurred in the study patients. None of the complications were related to the new device. CONCLUSION: An electrosurgical loop decreased the time required for resection of the uterine cervix during LSH for benign uterine conditions. This device facilitates and increases the safety of this procedure.
format Text
id pubmed-3016112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30161122011-02-17 Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy Pasic, Resad Abdelmonem, Allam Levine, Ronald JSLS Scientific Papers OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate a new electrosurgical instrument (Lap Loop device) that amputates the uterine corpus from the cervix during a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) and to compare the time required for cervical amputation with traditional methods. METHODS: This comparative trial was conducted at the University of Louisville and Norton Healthcare Hospitals, Louisville, KY. The patients comprised 29 women scheduled for hysterectomy for benign conditions. All patients underwent laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. The Lap Loop device was used in 17 patients to section the cervix. Conventional methods with either laparoscopic monopolar scissors or Harmonic scalpel were used in 12 patients. RESULTS: In the control group, the mean cervical cutting time with laparoscopic scissors or Harmonic scalpel was 14.4 minutes. The mean time for the application of the loop electrode and cutting time was 6.6 minutes and was significantly shorter than the cutting time of conventional methods. Two minor complications (7.4% of cases) and one relatively major complication (3.7%), an incisional hernia, occurred in the study patients. None of the complications were related to the new device. CONCLUSION: An electrosurgical loop decreased the time required for resection of the uterine cervix during LSH for benign uterine conditions. This device facilitates and increases the safety of this procedure. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2006 /pmc/articles/PMC3016112/ /pubmed/16882425 Text en © 2006 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Pasic, Resad
Abdelmonem, Allam
Levine, Ronald
Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy
title Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy
title_full Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy
title_fullStr Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy
title_short Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy
title_sort comparison of cervical detachment using monopolar lap loop ligature and conventional methods in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882425
work_keys_str_mv AT pasicresad comparisonofcervicaldetachmentusingmonopolarlaploopligatureandconventionalmethodsinlaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomy
AT abdelmonemallam comparisonofcervicaldetachmentusingmonopolarlaploopligatureandconventionalmethodsinlaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomy
AT levineronald comparisonofcervicaldetachmentusingmonopolarlaploopligatureandconventionalmethodsinlaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomy