Cargando…
Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate a new electrosurgical instrument (Lap Loop device) that amputates the uterine corpus from the cervix during a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) and to compare the time required for cervical amputation with traditional methods. METHODS: This comparative...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882425 |
_version_ | 1782195670326706176 |
---|---|
author | Pasic, Resad Abdelmonem, Allam Levine, Ronald |
author_facet | Pasic, Resad Abdelmonem, Allam Levine, Ronald |
author_sort | Pasic, Resad |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate a new electrosurgical instrument (Lap Loop device) that amputates the uterine corpus from the cervix during a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) and to compare the time required for cervical amputation with traditional methods. METHODS: This comparative trial was conducted at the University of Louisville and Norton Healthcare Hospitals, Louisville, KY. The patients comprised 29 women scheduled for hysterectomy for benign conditions. All patients underwent laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. The Lap Loop device was used in 17 patients to section the cervix. Conventional methods with either laparoscopic monopolar scissors or Harmonic scalpel were used in 12 patients. RESULTS: In the control group, the mean cervical cutting time with laparoscopic scissors or Harmonic scalpel was 14.4 minutes. The mean time for the application of the loop electrode and cutting time was 6.6 minutes and was significantly shorter than the cutting time of conventional methods. Two minor complications (7.4% of cases) and one relatively major complication (3.7%), an incisional hernia, occurred in the study patients. None of the complications were related to the new device. CONCLUSION: An electrosurgical loop decreased the time required for resection of the uterine cervix during LSH for benign uterine conditions. This device facilitates and increases the safety of this procedure. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3016112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30161122011-02-17 Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy Pasic, Resad Abdelmonem, Allam Levine, Ronald JSLS Scientific Papers OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate a new electrosurgical instrument (Lap Loop device) that amputates the uterine corpus from the cervix during a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) and to compare the time required for cervical amputation with traditional methods. METHODS: This comparative trial was conducted at the University of Louisville and Norton Healthcare Hospitals, Louisville, KY. The patients comprised 29 women scheduled for hysterectomy for benign conditions. All patients underwent laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. The Lap Loop device was used in 17 patients to section the cervix. Conventional methods with either laparoscopic monopolar scissors or Harmonic scalpel were used in 12 patients. RESULTS: In the control group, the mean cervical cutting time with laparoscopic scissors or Harmonic scalpel was 14.4 minutes. The mean time for the application of the loop electrode and cutting time was 6.6 minutes and was significantly shorter than the cutting time of conventional methods. Two minor complications (7.4% of cases) and one relatively major complication (3.7%), an incisional hernia, occurred in the study patients. None of the complications were related to the new device. CONCLUSION: An electrosurgical loop decreased the time required for resection of the uterine cervix during LSH for benign uterine conditions. This device facilitates and increases the safety of this procedure. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2006 /pmc/articles/PMC3016112/ /pubmed/16882425 Text en © 2006 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Pasic, Resad Abdelmonem, Allam Levine, Ronald Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy |
title | Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy |
title_full | Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy |
title_short | Comparison of Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar Lap Loop Ligature and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy |
title_sort | comparison of cervical detachment using monopolar lap loop ligature and conventional methods in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882425 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pasicresad comparisonofcervicaldetachmentusingmonopolarlaploopligatureandconventionalmethodsinlaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomy AT abdelmonemallam comparisonofcervicaldetachmentusingmonopolarlaploopligatureandconventionalmethodsinlaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomy AT levineronald comparisonofcervicaldetachmentusingmonopolarlaploopligatureandconventionalmethodsinlaparoscopicsupracervicalhysterectomy |