Cargando…

A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the outcomes of routine laparoscopy and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in patients with suspected appendicitis. This is a retrospective study of the outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy compared with outcomes for patients undergoing open appendectomy (OA)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yong, Jamy L., Law, Wai Lun, Lo, Chung Yau, Lam, Chi Ming
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882418
_version_ 1782195676145254400
author Yong, Jamy L.
Law, Wai Lun
Lo, Chung Yau
Lam, Chi Ming
author_facet Yong, Jamy L.
Law, Wai Lun
Lo, Chung Yau
Lam, Chi Ming
author_sort Yong, Jamy L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the outcomes of routine laparoscopy and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in patients with suspected appendicitis. This is a retrospective study of the outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy compared with outcomes for patients undergoing open appendectomy (OA) during the time that LA came into use. METHOD: Results of patients managed with routine laparoscopy and LA for suspected acute appendicitis were reviewed and analyzed. The preoperative and intraoperative findings were recorded. The clinical outcomes were compared with those of patients undergoing OA in the preceding 10 months. RESULTS: During the LA study period, 97 patients (47 men) with the median age of 34 years (range, 18 to 79) presented with clinical features of acute appendicitis. With the exclusion of 5 patients with open operations and 10 patients with other pathologies, 82 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (Group A) for appendicitis. Thirty-one (37.8%) patients had complicated appendicitis (perforated or gangrenous appendicitis). Conversions were required in 6 patients (7.3%). During the OA period, 125 patients (57 men) with the median age of 42 (range, 19 to 79) years were operated on. With the exclusion of 6 patients with other pathologies, 119 underwent OA for acute appendicitis (Group B). Fifty-one (42.9%) had either perforated or gangrenous appendicitis. The median durations of surgery in Group A and Group B were 80 minutes (range, 40 to 195) and 60 minutes (range, 25 to 260), respectively (P<0.005). Postoperative complication rates were comparable between the 2 groups (13.4% in Group A versus 15.8% in Group B). The median hospital stay for patients in Group A and Group B were 3.0 days (range, 1 to 47) and 4.0 days (range, 1 to 47), respectively (P=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that routine laparoscopy and LA for suspected acute appendicitis is safe and is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay. Other intra-abdominal pathologies can also be diagnosed more accurately with the laparoscopic approach.
format Text
id pubmed-3016135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30161352011-02-17 A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy Yong, Jamy L. Law, Wai Lun Lo, Chung Yau Lam, Chi Ming JSLS Scientific Papers OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the outcomes of routine laparoscopy and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in patients with suspected appendicitis. This is a retrospective study of the outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy compared with outcomes for patients undergoing open appendectomy (OA) during the time that LA came into use. METHOD: Results of patients managed with routine laparoscopy and LA for suspected acute appendicitis were reviewed and analyzed. The preoperative and intraoperative findings were recorded. The clinical outcomes were compared with those of patients undergoing OA in the preceding 10 months. RESULTS: During the LA study period, 97 patients (47 men) with the median age of 34 years (range, 18 to 79) presented with clinical features of acute appendicitis. With the exclusion of 5 patients with open operations and 10 patients with other pathologies, 82 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (Group A) for appendicitis. Thirty-one (37.8%) patients had complicated appendicitis (perforated or gangrenous appendicitis). Conversions were required in 6 patients (7.3%). During the OA period, 125 patients (57 men) with the median age of 42 (range, 19 to 79) years were operated on. With the exclusion of 6 patients with other pathologies, 119 underwent OA for acute appendicitis (Group B). Fifty-one (42.9%) had either perforated or gangrenous appendicitis. The median durations of surgery in Group A and Group B were 80 minutes (range, 40 to 195) and 60 minutes (range, 25 to 260), respectively (P<0.005). Postoperative complication rates were comparable between the 2 groups (13.4% in Group A versus 15.8% in Group B). The median hospital stay for patients in Group A and Group B were 3.0 days (range, 1 to 47) and 4.0 days (range, 1 to 47), respectively (P=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that routine laparoscopy and LA for suspected acute appendicitis is safe and is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay. Other intra-abdominal pathologies can also be diagnosed more accurately with the laparoscopic approach. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2006 /pmc/articles/PMC3016135/ /pubmed/16882418 Text en © 2006 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Yong, Jamy L.
Law, Wai Lun
Lo, Chung Yau
Lam, Chi Ming
A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
title A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
title_full A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
title_short A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
title_sort comparative study of routine laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882418
work_keys_str_mv AT yongjamyl acomparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy
AT lawwailun acomparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy
AT lochungyau acomparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy
AT lamchiming acomparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy
AT yongjamyl comparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy
AT lawwailun comparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy
AT lochungyau comparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy
AT lamchiming comparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy