Cargando…
A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the outcomes of routine laparoscopy and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in patients with suspected appendicitis. This is a retrospective study of the outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy compared with outcomes for patients undergoing open appendectomy (OA)...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882418 |
_version_ | 1782195676145254400 |
---|---|
author | Yong, Jamy L. Law, Wai Lun Lo, Chung Yau Lam, Chi Ming |
author_facet | Yong, Jamy L. Law, Wai Lun Lo, Chung Yau Lam, Chi Ming |
author_sort | Yong, Jamy L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the outcomes of routine laparoscopy and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in patients with suspected appendicitis. This is a retrospective study of the outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy compared with outcomes for patients undergoing open appendectomy (OA) during the time that LA came into use. METHOD: Results of patients managed with routine laparoscopy and LA for suspected acute appendicitis were reviewed and analyzed. The preoperative and intraoperative findings were recorded. The clinical outcomes were compared with those of patients undergoing OA in the preceding 10 months. RESULTS: During the LA study period, 97 patients (47 men) with the median age of 34 years (range, 18 to 79) presented with clinical features of acute appendicitis. With the exclusion of 5 patients with open operations and 10 patients with other pathologies, 82 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (Group A) for appendicitis. Thirty-one (37.8%) patients had complicated appendicitis (perforated or gangrenous appendicitis). Conversions were required in 6 patients (7.3%). During the OA period, 125 patients (57 men) with the median age of 42 (range, 19 to 79) years were operated on. With the exclusion of 6 patients with other pathologies, 119 underwent OA for acute appendicitis (Group B). Fifty-one (42.9%) had either perforated or gangrenous appendicitis. The median durations of surgery in Group A and Group B were 80 minutes (range, 40 to 195) and 60 minutes (range, 25 to 260), respectively (P<0.005). Postoperative complication rates were comparable between the 2 groups (13.4% in Group A versus 15.8% in Group B). The median hospital stay for patients in Group A and Group B were 3.0 days (range, 1 to 47) and 4.0 days (range, 1 to 47), respectively (P=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that routine laparoscopy and LA for suspected acute appendicitis is safe and is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay. Other intra-abdominal pathologies can also be diagnosed more accurately with the laparoscopic approach. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3016135 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30161352011-02-17 A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy Yong, Jamy L. Law, Wai Lun Lo, Chung Yau Lam, Chi Ming JSLS Scientific Papers OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the outcomes of routine laparoscopy and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in patients with suspected appendicitis. This is a retrospective study of the outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy compared with outcomes for patients undergoing open appendectomy (OA) during the time that LA came into use. METHOD: Results of patients managed with routine laparoscopy and LA for suspected acute appendicitis were reviewed and analyzed. The preoperative and intraoperative findings were recorded. The clinical outcomes were compared with those of patients undergoing OA in the preceding 10 months. RESULTS: During the LA study period, 97 patients (47 men) with the median age of 34 years (range, 18 to 79) presented with clinical features of acute appendicitis. With the exclusion of 5 patients with open operations and 10 patients with other pathologies, 82 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (Group A) for appendicitis. Thirty-one (37.8%) patients had complicated appendicitis (perforated or gangrenous appendicitis). Conversions were required in 6 patients (7.3%). During the OA period, 125 patients (57 men) with the median age of 42 (range, 19 to 79) years were operated on. With the exclusion of 6 patients with other pathologies, 119 underwent OA for acute appendicitis (Group B). Fifty-one (42.9%) had either perforated or gangrenous appendicitis. The median durations of surgery in Group A and Group B were 80 minutes (range, 40 to 195) and 60 minutes (range, 25 to 260), respectively (P<0.005). Postoperative complication rates were comparable between the 2 groups (13.4% in Group A versus 15.8% in Group B). The median hospital stay for patients in Group A and Group B were 3.0 days (range, 1 to 47) and 4.0 days (range, 1 to 47), respectively (P=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that routine laparoscopy and LA for suspected acute appendicitis is safe and is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay. Other intra-abdominal pathologies can also be diagnosed more accurately with the laparoscopic approach. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2006 /pmc/articles/PMC3016135/ /pubmed/16882418 Text en © 2006 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Papers Yong, Jamy L. Law, Wai Lun Lo, Chung Yau Lam, Chi Ming A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy |
title | A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy |
title_full | A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy |
title_short | A Comparative Study of Routine Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy |
title_sort | comparative study of routine laparoscopic versus open appendectomy |
topic | Scientific Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882418 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yongjamyl acomparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy AT lawwailun acomparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy AT lochungyau acomparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy AT lamchiming acomparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy AT yongjamyl comparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy AT lawwailun comparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy AT lochungyau comparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy AT lamchiming comparativestudyofroutinelaparoscopicversusopenappendectomy |