Cargando…

What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review

PURPOSE: Female athletes have a significantly higher risk of sustaining an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury than male athletes. Biomechanical and neuromuscular factors have been reported as the main cause. The purpose of this review was to critically review results of the published literature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benjaminse, Anne, Gokeler, Alli, Fleisig, Glenn S., Sell, Timothy C., Otten, Bert
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20734027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1233-y
_version_ 1782195695128674304
author Benjaminse, Anne
Gokeler, Alli
Fleisig, Glenn S.
Sell, Timothy C.
Otten, Bert
author_facet Benjaminse, Anne
Gokeler, Alli
Fleisig, Glenn S.
Sell, Timothy C.
Otten, Bert
author_sort Benjaminse, Anne
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Female athletes have a significantly higher risk of sustaining an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury than male athletes. Biomechanical and neuromuscular factors have been reported as the main cause. The purpose of this review was to critically review results of the published literature on gender differences regarding biomechanical and neuromuscular movement patterns during plant and cutting maneuvers. METHODS: MEDLINE (1966 to December 2008), EMBASE (1947 to December 2008) and CINAHL (1981 to December 2008) searches were performed. The seven studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. RESULTS: Biomechanical gender differences were of questionable clinical relevance. Quadriceps dominance was not found in women. CONCLUSION: The question raises whether ACL injuries during plant and cutting maneuvers are purely gender related and whether women do have to move like men in order to reduce injury risk? Caution is warranted in making inferences as studies were heterogeneous in terms of subject and study characteristics and had low statistical power as a result of insufficient number of subjects. It is advised that future research moves beyond the isolated gender comparison and that larger sample sizes will be included. This review may aid in improving experiments to draw valid conclusions, in order to direct future ACL injury prevention programs, which might need to be more individualized.
format Text
id pubmed-3016229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30162292011-02-04 What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review Benjaminse, Anne Gokeler, Alli Fleisig, Glenn S. Sell, Timothy C. Otten, Bert Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Sports Medicine PURPOSE: Female athletes have a significantly higher risk of sustaining an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury than male athletes. Biomechanical and neuromuscular factors have been reported as the main cause. The purpose of this review was to critically review results of the published literature on gender differences regarding biomechanical and neuromuscular movement patterns during plant and cutting maneuvers. METHODS: MEDLINE (1966 to December 2008), EMBASE (1947 to December 2008) and CINAHL (1981 to December 2008) searches were performed. The seven studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. RESULTS: Biomechanical gender differences were of questionable clinical relevance. Quadriceps dominance was not found in women. CONCLUSION: The question raises whether ACL injuries during plant and cutting maneuvers are purely gender related and whether women do have to move like men in order to reduce injury risk? Caution is warranted in making inferences as studies were heterogeneous in terms of subject and study characteristics and had low statistical power as a result of insufficient number of subjects. It is advised that future research moves beyond the isolated gender comparison and that larger sample sizes will be included. This review may aid in improving experiments to draw valid conclusions, in order to direct future ACL injury prevention programs, which might need to be more individualized. Springer-Verlag 2010-08-24 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3016229/ /pubmed/20734027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1233-y Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Sports Medicine
Benjaminse, Anne
Gokeler, Alli
Fleisig, Glenn S.
Sell, Timothy C.
Otten, Bert
What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review
title What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review
title_full What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review
title_fullStr What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review
title_short What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review
title_sort what is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? a systematic review
topic Sports Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20734027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1233-y
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminseanne whatisthetrueevidenceforgenderrelateddifferencesduringplantandcutmaneuversasystematicreview
AT gokeleralli whatisthetrueevidenceforgenderrelateddifferencesduringplantandcutmaneuversasystematicreview
AT fleisigglenns whatisthetrueevidenceforgenderrelateddifferencesduringplantandcutmaneuversasystematicreview
AT selltimothyc whatisthetrueevidenceforgenderrelateddifferencesduringplantandcutmaneuversasystematicreview
AT ottenbert whatisthetrueevidenceforgenderrelateddifferencesduringplantandcutmaneuversasystematicreview