Cargando…
What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review
PURPOSE: Female athletes have a significantly higher risk of sustaining an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury than male athletes. Biomechanical and neuromuscular factors have been reported as the main cause. The purpose of this review was to critically review results of the published literature...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20734027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1233-y |
_version_ | 1782195695128674304 |
---|---|
author | Benjaminse, Anne Gokeler, Alli Fleisig, Glenn S. Sell, Timothy C. Otten, Bert |
author_facet | Benjaminse, Anne Gokeler, Alli Fleisig, Glenn S. Sell, Timothy C. Otten, Bert |
author_sort | Benjaminse, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Female athletes have a significantly higher risk of sustaining an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury than male athletes. Biomechanical and neuromuscular factors have been reported as the main cause. The purpose of this review was to critically review results of the published literature on gender differences regarding biomechanical and neuromuscular movement patterns during plant and cutting maneuvers. METHODS: MEDLINE (1966 to December 2008), EMBASE (1947 to December 2008) and CINAHL (1981 to December 2008) searches were performed. The seven studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. RESULTS: Biomechanical gender differences were of questionable clinical relevance. Quadriceps dominance was not found in women. CONCLUSION: The question raises whether ACL injuries during plant and cutting maneuvers are purely gender related and whether women do have to move like men in order to reduce injury risk? Caution is warranted in making inferences as studies were heterogeneous in terms of subject and study characteristics and had low statistical power as a result of insufficient number of subjects. It is advised that future research moves beyond the isolated gender comparison and that larger sample sizes will be included. This review may aid in improving experiments to draw valid conclusions, in order to direct future ACL injury prevention programs, which might need to be more individualized. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3016229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30162292011-02-04 What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review Benjaminse, Anne Gokeler, Alli Fleisig, Glenn S. Sell, Timothy C. Otten, Bert Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Sports Medicine PURPOSE: Female athletes have a significantly higher risk of sustaining an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury than male athletes. Biomechanical and neuromuscular factors have been reported as the main cause. The purpose of this review was to critically review results of the published literature on gender differences regarding biomechanical and neuromuscular movement patterns during plant and cutting maneuvers. METHODS: MEDLINE (1966 to December 2008), EMBASE (1947 to December 2008) and CINAHL (1981 to December 2008) searches were performed. The seven studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. RESULTS: Biomechanical gender differences were of questionable clinical relevance. Quadriceps dominance was not found in women. CONCLUSION: The question raises whether ACL injuries during plant and cutting maneuvers are purely gender related and whether women do have to move like men in order to reduce injury risk? Caution is warranted in making inferences as studies were heterogeneous in terms of subject and study characteristics and had low statistical power as a result of insufficient number of subjects. It is advised that future research moves beyond the isolated gender comparison and that larger sample sizes will be included. This review may aid in improving experiments to draw valid conclusions, in order to direct future ACL injury prevention programs, which might need to be more individualized. Springer-Verlag 2010-08-24 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3016229/ /pubmed/20734027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1233-y Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Sports Medicine Benjaminse, Anne Gokeler, Alli Fleisig, Glenn S. Sell, Timothy C. Otten, Bert What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review |
title | What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review |
title_full | What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review |
title_fullStr | What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review |
title_short | What is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? A systematic review |
title_sort | what is the true evidence for gender-related differences during plant and cut maneuvers? a systematic review |
topic | Sports Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20734027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1233-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benjaminseanne whatisthetrueevidenceforgenderrelateddifferencesduringplantandcutmaneuversasystematicreview AT gokeleralli whatisthetrueevidenceforgenderrelateddifferencesduringplantandcutmaneuversasystematicreview AT fleisigglenns whatisthetrueevidenceforgenderrelateddifferencesduringplantandcutmaneuversasystematicreview AT selltimothyc whatisthetrueevidenceforgenderrelateddifferencesduringplantandcutmaneuversasystematicreview AT ottenbert whatisthetrueevidenceforgenderrelateddifferencesduringplantandcutmaneuversasystematicreview |