Cargando…

The impact of dose calculation algorithms on partial and whole breast radiation treatment plans

BACKGROUND: This paper compares the calculated dose to target and normal tissues when using pencil beam (PBC), superposition/convolution (AAA) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms for whole breast (WBI) and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) treatment plans. METHODS: Plans for 10 patients who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basran, Parminder S, Zavgorodni, Sergei, Berrang, Tanya, Olivotto, Ivo A, Beckham, Wayne
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21162739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-5-120
_version_ 1782195711577686016
author Basran, Parminder S
Zavgorodni, Sergei
Berrang, Tanya
Olivotto, Ivo A
Beckham, Wayne
author_facet Basran, Parminder S
Zavgorodni, Sergei
Berrang, Tanya
Olivotto, Ivo A
Beckham, Wayne
author_sort Basran, Parminder S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper compares the calculated dose to target and normal tissues when using pencil beam (PBC), superposition/convolution (AAA) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms for whole breast (WBI) and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) treatment plans. METHODS: Plans for 10 patients who met all dosimetry constraints on a prospective APBI protocol when using PBC calculations were recomputed with AAA and MC, keeping the monitor units and beam angles fixed. Similar calculations were performed for WBI plans on the same patients. Doses to target and normal tissue volumes were tested for significance using the paired Student's t-test. RESULTS: For WBI plans the average dose to target volumes when using PBC calculations was not significantly different than AAA calculations, the average PBC dose to the ipsilateral breast was 10.5% higher than the AAA calculations and the average MC dose to the ipsilateral breast was 11.8% lower than the PBC calculations. For ABPI plans there were no differences in dose to the planning target volume, ipsilateral breast, heart, ipsilateral lung, or contra-lateral lung. Although not significant, the maximum PBC dose to the contra-lateral breast was 1.9% higher than AAA and the PBC dose to the clinical target volume was 2.1% higher than AAA. When WBI technique is switched to APBI, there was significant reduction in dose to the ipsilateral breast when using PBC, a significant reduction in dose to the ipsilateral lung when using AAA, and a significant reduction in dose to the ipsilateral breast and lung and contra-lateral lung when using MC. CONCLUSIONS: There is very good agreement between PBC, AAA and MC for all target and most normal tissues when treating with APBI and WBI and most of the differences in doses to target and normal tissues are not clinically significant. However, a commonly used dosimetry constraint, as recommended by the ASTRO consensus document for APBI, that no point in the contra-lateral breast volume should receive >3% of the prescribed dose needs to be relaxed to >5%.
format Text
id pubmed-3016285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30162852011-01-06 The impact of dose calculation algorithms on partial and whole breast radiation treatment plans Basran, Parminder S Zavgorodni, Sergei Berrang, Tanya Olivotto, Ivo A Beckham, Wayne Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: This paper compares the calculated dose to target and normal tissues when using pencil beam (PBC), superposition/convolution (AAA) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms for whole breast (WBI) and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) treatment plans. METHODS: Plans for 10 patients who met all dosimetry constraints on a prospective APBI protocol when using PBC calculations were recomputed with AAA and MC, keeping the monitor units and beam angles fixed. Similar calculations were performed for WBI plans on the same patients. Doses to target and normal tissue volumes were tested for significance using the paired Student's t-test. RESULTS: For WBI plans the average dose to target volumes when using PBC calculations was not significantly different than AAA calculations, the average PBC dose to the ipsilateral breast was 10.5% higher than the AAA calculations and the average MC dose to the ipsilateral breast was 11.8% lower than the PBC calculations. For ABPI plans there were no differences in dose to the planning target volume, ipsilateral breast, heart, ipsilateral lung, or contra-lateral lung. Although not significant, the maximum PBC dose to the contra-lateral breast was 1.9% higher than AAA and the PBC dose to the clinical target volume was 2.1% higher than AAA. When WBI technique is switched to APBI, there was significant reduction in dose to the ipsilateral breast when using PBC, a significant reduction in dose to the ipsilateral lung when using AAA, and a significant reduction in dose to the ipsilateral breast and lung and contra-lateral lung when using MC. CONCLUSIONS: There is very good agreement between PBC, AAA and MC for all target and most normal tissues when treating with APBI and WBI and most of the differences in doses to target and normal tissues are not clinically significant. However, a commonly used dosimetry constraint, as recommended by the ASTRO consensus document for APBI, that no point in the contra-lateral breast volume should receive >3% of the prescribed dose needs to be relaxed to >5%. BioMed Central 2010-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3016285/ /pubmed/21162739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-5-120 Text en Copyright ©2010 Basran et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Basran, Parminder S
Zavgorodni, Sergei
Berrang, Tanya
Olivotto, Ivo A
Beckham, Wayne
The impact of dose calculation algorithms on partial and whole breast radiation treatment plans
title The impact of dose calculation algorithms on partial and whole breast radiation treatment plans
title_full The impact of dose calculation algorithms on partial and whole breast radiation treatment plans
title_fullStr The impact of dose calculation algorithms on partial and whole breast radiation treatment plans
title_full_unstemmed The impact of dose calculation algorithms on partial and whole breast radiation treatment plans
title_short The impact of dose calculation algorithms on partial and whole breast radiation treatment plans
title_sort impact of dose calculation algorithms on partial and whole breast radiation treatment plans
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21162739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-5-120
work_keys_str_mv AT basranparminders theimpactofdosecalculationalgorithmsonpartialandwholebreastradiationtreatmentplans
AT zavgorodnisergei theimpactofdosecalculationalgorithmsonpartialandwholebreastradiationtreatmentplans
AT berrangtanya theimpactofdosecalculationalgorithmsonpartialandwholebreastradiationtreatmentplans
AT olivottoivoa theimpactofdosecalculationalgorithmsonpartialandwholebreastradiationtreatmentplans
AT beckhamwayne theimpactofdosecalculationalgorithmsonpartialandwholebreastradiationtreatmentplans
AT basranparminders impactofdosecalculationalgorithmsonpartialandwholebreastradiationtreatmentplans
AT zavgorodnisergei impactofdosecalculationalgorithmsonpartialandwholebreastradiationtreatmentplans
AT berrangtanya impactofdosecalculationalgorithmsonpartialandwholebreastradiationtreatmentplans
AT olivottoivoa impactofdosecalculationalgorithmsonpartialandwholebreastradiationtreatmentplans
AT beckhamwayne impactofdosecalculationalgorithmsonpartialandwholebreastradiationtreatmentplans