Cargando…

Successful interdisciplinary management of the misdeployment of two self-expanding stents into the internal carotid artery: a case report

INTRODUCTION: With the widespread use of carotid artery stenting, previously unknown technical mistakes of this treatment modality are now being encountered. There are multiple strategies for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. With regard to surgical management, endarterectomy and patch plasty ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jost, Dominik, Meissner, Helfried, von Loewensprung, Henning, Guethe, Thomas, Hupp, Thomas, Henkes, Hans
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21143886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-4-397
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: With the widespread use of carotid artery stenting, previously unknown technical mistakes of this treatment modality are now being encountered. There are multiple strategies for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. With regard to surgical management, endarterectomy and patch plasty are favored. To the best of our knowledge, this report is the first description of a complete stent removal by the eversion technique. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 63-year-old Caucasian man with misdeployment of two stents into his stenotic proximal internal carotid artery, resulting in a high-grade mechanical obstruction of the internal carotid artery lumen. With the contralateral internal carotid artery already occluded and associated stenoses of both proximal and distal vertebral arteries, an interdisciplinary therapeutic concept was applied. Bilateral balloon angioplasty and stenting of the proximal and distal stenotic vertebral arteries were carried out to provide sufficient posterior collateral blood flow, followed by successful surgical stentectomy and carotid endarterectomy using the eversion technique. Duplex scanning and neurological assessments were normal over a 12-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary treatment is a recommended option to protect patients from further impairment. Further evaluation in larger studies is highly recommended.