Cargando…

Pylorus Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Peri-Ampullary Carcinoma, Is It a Good Option?

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard surgical treatment for resectable peri-ampullary tumors. It can be performed with or without pylorus preservation. Many surgeons have a negative opinion of pylorus preserving PD (PPPD) and consider it an inferior operation, especially from an oncological...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Alsaif, Faisal
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20339174
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.61231
_version_ 1782195760682500096
author Alsaif, Faisal
author_facet Alsaif, Faisal
author_sort Alsaif, Faisal
collection PubMed
description Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard surgical treatment for resectable peri-ampullary tumors. It can be performed with or without pylorus preservation. Many surgeons have a negative opinion of pylorus preserving PD (PPPD) and consider it an inferior operation, especially from an oncological point of view. This article reviews the various aspects of PD in the context of operative factors like blood loss and operation time, complications such as delayed gastric emptying and anastomotic leaks, and the impact on quality of life and survival. We aim to show that PPPD is at least as good as classic PD, if not better in some aspects.
format Text
id pubmed-3016509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30165092011-01-13 Pylorus Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Peri-Ampullary Carcinoma, Is It a Good Option? Alsaif, Faisal Saudi J Gastroenterol Review Article Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard surgical treatment for resectable peri-ampullary tumors. It can be performed with or without pylorus preservation. Many surgeons have a negative opinion of pylorus preserving PD (PPPD) and consider it an inferior operation, especially from an oncological point of view. This article reviews the various aspects of PD in the context of operative factors like blood loss and operation time, complications such as delayed gastric emptying and anastomotic leaks, and the impact on quality of life and survival. We aim to show that PPPD is at least as good as classic PD, if not better in some aspects. Medknow Publications 2010-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3016509/ /pubmed/20339174 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.61231 Text en © Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Alsaif, Faisal
Pylorus Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Peri-Ampullary Carcinoma, Is It a Good Option?
title Pylorus Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Peri-Ampullary Carcinoma, Is It a Good Option?
title_full Pylorus Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Peri-Ampullary Carcinoma, Is It a Good Option?
title_fullStr Pylorus Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Peri-Ampullary Carcinoma, Is It a Good Option?
title_full_unstemmed Pylorus Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Peri-Ampullary Carcinoma, Is It a Good Option?
title_short Pylorus Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Peri-Ampullary Carcinoma, Is It a Good Option?
title_sort pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary carcinoma, is it a good option?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20339174
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.61231
work_keys_str_mv AT alsaiffaisal pyloruspreservingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullarycarcinomaisitagoodoption