Cargando…
Morphospecies and Taxonomic Species Comparison for Hymenoptera
The use of morphospecies as surrogates for taxonomic species has been proposed as an alternative to overcome the identification difficulties associated with many invertebrate studies, such as biodiversity surveys. Hymenoptera specimens were collected by beating and pitfall traps, and were separated...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
University of Wisconsin Library
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20874395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.010.10801 |
_version_ | 1782195837234839552 |
---|---|
author | Derraik, José G. B. Early, John W. Closs, Gerard P. Dickinson, Katharine J. M. |
author_facet | Derraik, José G. B. Early, John W. Closs, Gerard P. Dickinson, Katharine J. M. |
author_sort | Derraik, José G. B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of morphospecies as surrogates for taxonomic species has been proposed as an alternative to overcome the identification difficulties associated with many invertebrate studies, such as biodiversity surveys. Hymenoptera specimens were collected by beating and pitfall traps, and were separated into morphospecies by a non-specialist with no prior training, and later identified by an expert taxonomist. The number of Hymenoptera morphospecies and taxonomic species was 37 and 42, respectively, representing an underestimation error of 12%. Different families presented varying levels of difficulty, and although the species estimation provided by the use of morphospecies initially appeared to have a relatively minor error rate, this was actually an artefact. Splitting and lumping errors balanced each other out, wrongly suggesting that morphospecies were reasonable surrogates for taxonomic species in the Hymenoptera. The use of morphospecies should be adopted only for selected target groups, which have been assessed as reliable surrogates for taxonomic species beforehand, and some prior training to the non-specialist is likely to be of primary importance. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3016916 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | University of Wisconsin Library |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30169162012-02-09 Morphospecies and Taxonomic Species Comparison for Hymenoptera Derraik, José G. B. Early, John W. Closs, Gerard P. Dickinson, Katharine J. M. J Insect Sci Article The use of morphospecies as surrogates for taxonomic species has been proposed as an alternative to overcome the identification difficulties associated with many invertebrate studies, such as biodiversity surveys. Hymenoptera specimens were collected by beating and pitfall traps, and were separated into morphospecies by a non-specialist with no prior training, and later identified by an expert taxonomist. The number of Hymenoptera morphospecies and taxonomic species was 37 and 42, respectively, representing an underestimation error of 12%. Different families presented varying levels of difficulty, and although the species estimation provided by the use of morphospecies initially appeared to have a relatively minor error rate, this was actually an artefact. Splitting and lumping errors balanced each other out, wrongly suggesting that morphospecies were reasonable surrogates for taxonomic species in the Hymenoptera. The use of morphospecies should be adopted only for selected target groups, which have been assessed as reliable surrogates for taxonomic species beforehand, and some prior training to the non-specialist is likely to be of primary importance. University of Wisconsin Library 2010-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3016916/ /pubmed/20874395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.010.10801 Text en © 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Derraik, José G. B. Early, John W. Closs, Gerard P. Dickinson, Katharine J. M. Morphospecies and Taxonomic Species Comparison for Hymenoptera |
title | Morphospecies and Taxonomic Species Comparison for Hymenoptera |
title_full | Morphospecies and Taxonomic Species Comparison for Hymenoptera |
title_fullStr | Morphospecies and Taxonomic Species Comparison for Hymenoptera |
title_full_unstemmed | Morphospecies and Taxonomic Species Comparison for Hymenoptera |
title_short | Morphospecies and Taxonomic Species Comparison for Hymenoptera |
title_sort | morphospecies and taxonomic species comparison for hymenoptera |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3016916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20874395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.010.10801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derraikjosegb morphospeciesandtaxonomicspeciescomparisonforhymenoptera AT earlyjohnw morphospeciesandtaxonomicspeciescomparisonforhymenoptera AT clossgerardp morphospeciesandtaxonomicspeciescomparisonforhymenoptera AT dickinsonkatharinejm morphospeciesandtaxonomicspeciescomparisonforhymenoptera |