Cargando…

A study of the perceived risks, benefits and barriers to the use of SDD in adult critical care units (The SuDDICU study)

BACKGROUND-: Hospital acquired infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality and markedly increased health care costs. Critically ill patients who require management in an Intensive Care Unit are particularly susceptible to these infections which are associated with a very high mortality....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuthbertson, BH, Francis, J, Campbell, MK, MacIntyre, L, Seppelt, I, Grimshaw, J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3017022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21129208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-117
_version_ 1782195861990670336
author Cuthbertson, BH
Francis, J
Campbell, MK
MacIntyre, L
Seppelt, I
Grimshaw, J
author_facet Cuthbertson, BH
Francis, J
Campbell, MK
MacIntyre, L
Seppelt, I
Grimshaw, J
author_sort Cuthbertson, BH
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND-: Hospital acquired infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality and markedly increased health care costs. Critically ill patients who require management in an Intensive Care Unit are particularly susceptible to these infections which are associated with a very high mortality. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) may reduce these infections and improve mortality but it has not been widely adopted into practice. We aim to 1. Clarify reasons why clinicians have avoided implementing SDD into clinical practice despite the current best-evidence 2. Describe barriers to SDD implementation and 3. Identify what further evidence is required before full scale clinical implementation would be considered appropriate and feasible. METHODS-: We have developed an international 'multi-lens' approach to investigate SDD from several perspectives. In case studies we will identify accounts of implementation of SDD in practice, in terms of the behaviours performed by the full range of individual clinicians, accounts of how SDD was first introduced into the Unit and specific content that may be used to populate the content of behaviour change techniques to be used in an implementation intervention and procedures to consider in order to deliver an implementation trial. In a 4 round Delphi study we will identify the range of stakeholders' beliefs, views and perceived barriers relating to the use of SDD. We will generate hypotheses about key beliefs about SDD and will inform the feasibility of any future randomised controlled trial. In large-scale nationwide postal questionnaire surveys of the state of current practice we will identify the factors predicting acceptability of an effectiveness or implementation trial using, and informed by, the theoretical domains structure. In semi-structured interviews with active international clinical trialists we will assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial and identify challenges and barriers to undertaking research in the field of SDD research. DISCUSSION: We believe these methods will allow us to determine whether clinical implementation trials or further large effectiveness trials are required before full scale implementation into clinical practice.
format Text
id pubmed-3017022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30170222011-01-07 A study of the perceived risks, benefits and barriers to the use of SDD in adult critical care units (The SuDDICU study) Cuthbertson, BH Francis, J Campbell, MK MacIntyre, L Seppelt, I Grimshaw, J Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND-: Hospital acquired infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality and markedly increased health care costs. Critically ill patients who require management in an Intensive Care Unit are particularly susceptible to these infections which are associated with a very high mortality. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) may reduce these infections and improve mortality but it has not been widely adopted into practice. We aim to 1. Clarify reasons why clinicians have avoided implementing SDD into clinical practice despite the current best-evidence 2. Describe barriers to SDD implementation and 3. Identify what further evidence is required before full scale clinical implementation would be considered appropriate and feasible. METHODS-: We have developed an international 'multi-lens' approach to investigate SDD from several perspectives. In case studies we will identify accounts of implementation of SDD in practice, in terms of the behaviours performed by the full range of individual clinicians, accounts of how SDD was first introduced into the Unit and specific content that may be used to populate the content of behaviour change techniques to be used in an implementation intervention and procedures to consider in order to deliver an implementation trial. In a 4 round Delphi study we will identify the range of stakeholders' beliefs, views and perceived barriers relating to the use of SDD. We will generate hypotheses about key beliefs about SDD and will inform the feasibility of any future randomised controlled trial. In large-scale nationwide postal questionnaire surveys of the state of current practice we will identify the factors predicting acceptability of an effectiveness or implementation trial using, and informed by, the theoretical domains structure. In semi-structured interviews with active international clinical trialists we will assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial and identify challenges and barriers to undertaking research in the field of SDD research. DISCUSSION: We believe these methods will allow us to determine whether clinical implementation trials or further large effectiveness trials are required before full scale implementation into clinical practice. BioMed Central 2010-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3017022/ /pubmed/21129208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-117 Text en Copyright ©2010 Cuthbertson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Cuthbertson, BH
Francis, J
Campbell, MK
MacIntyre, L
Seppelt, I
Grimshaw, J
A study of the perceived risks, benefits and barriers to the use of SDD in adult critical care units (The SuDDICU study)
title A study of the perceived risks, benefits and barriers to the use of SDD in adult critical care units (The SuDDICU study)
title_full A study of the perceived risks, benefits and barriers to the use of SDD in adult critical care units (The SuDDICU study)
title_fullStr A study of the perceived risks, benefits and barriers to the use of SDD in adult critical care units (The SuDDICU study)
title_full_unstemmed A study of the perceived risks, benefits and barriers to the use of SDD in adult critical care units (The SuDDICU study)
title_short A study of the perceived risks, benefits and barriers to the use of SDD in adult critical care units (The SuDDICU study)
title_sort study of the perceived risks, benefits and barriers to the use of sdd in adult critical care units (the suddicu study)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3017022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21129208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-117
work_keys_str_mv AT cuthbertsonbh astudyoftheperceivedrisksbenefitsandbarrierstotheuseofsddinadultcriticalcareunitsthesuddicustudy
AT francisj astudyoftheperceivedrisksbenefitsandbarrierstotheuseofsddinadultcriticalcareunitsthesuddicustudy
AT campbellmk astudyoftheperceivedrisksbenefitsandbarrierstotheuseofsddinadultcriticalcareunitsthesuddicustudy
AT macintyrel astudyoftheperceivedrisksbenefitsandbarrierstotheuseofsddinadultcriticalcareunitsthesuddicustudy
AT seppelti astudyoftheperceivedrisksbenefitsandbarrierstotheuseofsddinadultcriticalcareunitsthesuddicustudy
AT grimshawj astudyoftheperceivedrisksbenefitsandbarrierstotheuseofsddinadultcriticalcareunitsthesuddicustudy
AT cuthbertsonbh studyoftheperceivedrisksbenefitsandbarrierstotheuseofsddinadultcriticalcareunitsthesuddicustudy
AT francisj studyoftheperceivedrisksbenefitsandbarrierstotheuseofsddinadultcriticalcareunitsthesuddicustudy
AT campbellmk studyoftheperceivedrisksbenefitsandbarrierstotheuseofsddinadultcriticalcareunitsthesuddicustudy
AT macintyrel studyoftheperceivedrisksbenefitsandbarrierstotheuseofsddinadultcriticalcareunitsthesuddicustudy
AT seppelti studyoftheperceivedrisksbenefitsandbarrierstotheuseofsddinadultcriticalcareunitsthesuddicustudy
AT grimshawj studyoftheperceivedrisksbenefitsandbarrierstotheuseofsddinadultcriticalcareunitsthesuddicustudy