Cargando…

Feasibility and impact of providing feedback to vaccinating medical clinics: evaluating a public health intervention

BACKGROUND: Vaccine coverage (VC) at a given age is a widely-used indicator for measuring the performance of vaccination programs. However, there is increasing data suggesting that measuring delays in administering vaccines complements the measure of VC. Providing feedback to vaccinators is recogniz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brousseau, Nicholas, Sauvageau, Chantal, Ouakki, Manale, Audet, Diane, Kiely, Marilou, Couture, Colette, Paré, Alain, Deceuninck, Geneviève
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3017028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21129216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-750
_version_ 1782195864704385024
author Brousseau, Nicholas
Sauvageau, Chantal
Ouakki, Manale
Audet, Diane
Kiely, Marilou
Couture, Colette
Paré, Alain
Deceuninck, Geneviève
author_facet Brousseau, Nicholas
Sauvageau, Chantal
Ouakki, Manale
Audet, Diane
Kiely, Marilou
Couture, Colette
Paré, Alain
Deceuninck, Geneviève
author_sort Brousseau, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vaccine coverage (VC) at a given age is a widely-used indicator for measuring the performance of vaccination programs. However, there is increasing data suggesting that measuring delays in administering vaccines complements the measure of VC. Providing feedback to vaccinators is recognized as an effective strategy for improving vaccine coverage, but its implementation has not been widely documented in Canada. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of providing personalized feedback to vaccinators and its impact on vaccination delays (VD). METHODS: In April and May 2008, a one-hour personalized feedback session was provided to health professionals in vaccinating medical clinics in the Quebec City region. VD for vaccines administered at two and twelve months of age were presented. Data from the regional vaccination registry were analysed for participating clinics. Two 12-month periods before and after the intervention were compared, namely from April 1(st), 2007 to March 31(st), 2008 and from June 1(st), 2008 to May 31(st), 2009. RESULTS: Ten medical clinics out of the twelve approached (83%), representing more than 2500 vaccinated children, participated in the project. Preparing and conducting the feedback involved 20 hours of work and expenses of $1000 per clinic. Based on a delay of one month, 94% of first doses of DTaP-Polio-Hib and 77% of meningococcal vaccine doses respected the vaccination schedule both before and after the intervention. Following the feedback, respect of the vaccination schedule increased for vaccines planned at 12 months for the four clinics that had modified their vaccination practices related to multiple injections (depending on the clinic, VD decreased by 24.4%, 32.0%, 40.2% and 44.6% respectively, p < 0.001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that it is feasible to provide personalized feedback to vaccinating clinics. While it may have encouraged positive changes in practice concerning multiple injections, this intervention on its own did not impact vaccination delays of the clinics visited. It is possible that feedback integrated into other types of effective interventions and sustained over time may have more impact on VD.
format Text
id pubmed-3017028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30170282011-01-07 Feasibility and impact of providing feedback to vaccinating medical clinics: evaluating a public health intervention Brousseau, Nicholas Sauvageau, Chantal Ouakki, Manale Audet, Diane Kiely, Marilou Couture, Colette Paré, Alain Deceuninck, Geneviève BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Vaccine coverage (VC) at a given age is a widely-used indicator for measuring the performance of vaccination programs. However, there is increasing data suggesting that measuring delays in administering vaccines complements the measure of VC. Providing feedback to vaccinators is recognized as an effective strategy for improving vaccine coverage, but its implementation has not been widely documented in Canada. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of providing personalized feedback to vaccinators and its impact on vaccination delays (VD). METHODS: In April and May 2008, a one-hour personalized feedback session was provided to health professionals in vaccinating medical clinics in the Quebec City region. VD for vaccines administered at two and twelve months of age were presented. Data from the regional vaccination registry were analysed for participating clinics. Two 12-month periods before and after the intervention were compared, namely from April 1(st), 2007 to March 31(st), 2008 and from June 1(st), 2008 to May 31(st), 2009. RESULTS: Ten medical clinics out of the twelve approached (83%), representing more than 2500 vaccinated children, participated in the project. Preparing and conducting the feedback involved 20 hours of work and expenses of $1000 per clinic. Based on a delay of one month, 94% of first doses of DTaP-Polio-Hib and 77% of meningococcal vaccine doses respected the vaccination schedule both before and after the intervention. Following the feedback, respect of the vaccination schedule increased for vaccines planned at 12 months for the four clinics that had modified their vaccination practices related to multiple injections (depending on the clinic, VD decreased by 24.4%, 32.0%, 40.2% and 44.6% respectively, p < 0.001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that it is feasible to provide personalized feedback to vaccinating clinics. While it may have encouraged positive changes in practice concerning multiple injections, this intervention on its own did not impact vaccination delays of the clinics visited. It is possible that feedback integrated into other types of effective interventions and sustained over time may have more impact on VD. BioMed Central 2010-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3017028/ /pubmed/21129216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-750 Text en Copyright ©2010 Brousseau et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brousseau, Nicholas
Sauvageau, Chantal
Ouakki, Manale
Audet, Diane
Kiely, Marilou
Couture, Colette
Paré, Alain
Deceuninck, Geneviève
Feasibility and impact of providing feedback to vaccinating medical clinics: evaluating a public health intervention
title Feasibility and impact of providing feedback to vaccinating medical clinics: evaluating a public health intervention
title_full Feasibility and impact of providing feedback to vaccinating medical clinics: evaluating a public health intervention
title_fullStr Feasibility and impact of providing feedback to vaccinating medical clinics: evaluating a public health intervention
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and impact of providing feedback to vaccinating medical clinics: evaluating a public health intervention
title_short Feasibility and impact of providing feedback to vaccinating medical clinics: evaluating a public health intervention
title_sort feasibility and impact of providing feedback to vaccinating medical clinics: evaluating a public health intervention
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3017028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21129216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-750
work_keys_str_mv AT brousseaunicholas feasibilityandimpactofprovidingfeedbacktovaccinatingmedicalclinicsevaluatingapublichealthintervention
AT sauvageauchantal feasibilityandimpactofprovidingfeedbacktovaccinatingmedicalclinicsevaluatingapublichealthintervention
AT ouakkimanale feasibilityandimpactofprovidingfeedbacktovaccinatingmedicalclinicsevaluatingapublichealthintervention
AT audetdiane feasibilityandimpactofprovidingfeedbacktovaccinatingmedicalclinicsevaluatingapublichealthintervention
AT kielymarilou feasibilityandimpactofprovidingfeedbacktovaccinatingmedicalclinicsevaluatingapublichealthintervention
AT couturecolette feasibilityandimpactofprovidingfeedbacktovaccinatingmedicalclinicsevaluatingapublichealthintervention
AT parealain feasibilityandimpactofprovidingfeedbacktovaccinatingmedicalclinicsevaluatingapublichealthintervention
AT deceuninckgenevieve feasibilityandimpactofprovidingfeedbacktovaccinatingmedicalclinicsevaluatingapublichealthintervention