Cargando…

Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

PURPOSE: In some patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), multiple episodes of electrical storm (ES) can occur. We assessed the prevalence, features, and predictors of ES in patients with ICD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-five patients with an ICD were analyzed. ES was defined...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Pil Sang, Kim, June Soo, Shin, Dae-Hee, Park, Jung Wae, Bae, Ki In, Lee, Chang Hee, Jung, Dong Chae, Ryu, Dong Ryeol, On, Young Keun
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3017704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21155031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2011.52.1.26
_version_ 1782195937048788992
author Song, Pil Sang
Kim, June Soo
Shin, Dae-Hee
Park, Jung Wae
Bae, Ki In
Lee, Chang Hee
Jung, Dong Chae
Ryu, Dong Ryeol
On, Young Keun
author_facet Song, Pil Sang
Kim, June Soo
Shin, Dae-Hee
Park, Jung Wae
Bae, Ki In
Lee, Chang Hee
Jung, Dong Chae
Ryu, Dong Ryeol
On, Young Keun
author_sort Song, Pil Sang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In some patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), multiple episodes of electrical storm (ES) can occur. We assessed the prevalence, features, and predictors of ES in patients with ICD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-five patients with an ICD were analyzed. ES was defined as the occurrence of two or more ventricular tachyarrhythmias within 24 hours. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients experienced at least one ES episode, and 16 patients experienced two or more ES episodes. The first ES occurred 209 ± 277 days after ICD implantation. In most ES cases, the index arrhythmia was ventricular tachycardia (65%). There were no obvious etiologic factors at the onset of most ES episodes (57%). More patients with a structurally normal heart (p = 0.043) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the index arrhythmia (p = 0.017) were in the ES-free group. Kaplan-Meier estimates and a log-rank test showed that patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMP) (log-rank test, p = 0.016) or with left ventricular ejection fraction < 35% (p = 0.032) were more likely to experience ES, and that patients with VF (p = 0.047) were less affected by ES. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that nonischemic DCMP correlated with a greater probability of ES (hazard ratio, 3.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-11.85; p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: ES is a common and recurrent event in patients with an ICD. Nonischemic DCMP is an independent predictor of ES. Patients with VF or with a structurally normal heart are less likely to experience ES.
format Text
id pubmed-3017704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30177042011-01-10 Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Song, Pil Sang Kim, June Soo Shin, Dae-Hee Park, Jung Wae Bae, Ki In Lee, Chang Hee Jung, Dong Chae Ryu, Dong Ryeol On, Young Keun Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: In some patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), multiple episodes of electrical storm (ES) can occur. We assessed the prevalence, features, and predictors of ES in patients with ICD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-five patients with an ICD were analyzed. ES was defined as the occurrence of two or more ventricular tachyarrhythmias within 24 hours. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients experienced at least one ES episode, and 16 patients experienced two or more ES episodes. The first ES occurred 209 ± 277 days after ICD implantation. In most ES cases, the index arrhythmia was ventricular tachycardia (65%). There were no obvious etiologic factors at the onset of most ES episodes (57%). More patients with a structurally normal heart (p = 0.043) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the index arrhythmia (p = 0.017) were in the ES-free group. Kaplan-Meier estimates and a log-rank test showed that patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMP) (log-rank test, p = 0.016) or with left ventricular ejection fraction < 35% (p = 0.032) were more likely to experience ES, and that patients with VF (p = 0.047) were less affected by ES. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that nonischemic DCMP correlated with a greater probability of ES (hazard ratio, 3.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-11.85; p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: ES is a common and recurrent event in patients with an ICD. Nonischemic DCMP is an independent predictor of ES. Patients with VF or with a structurally normal heart are less likely to experience ES. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2011-01-01 2010-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3017704/ /pubmed/21155031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2011.52.1.26 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2011 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Song, Pil Sang
Kim, June Soo
Shin, Dae-Hee
Park, Jung Wae
Bae, Ki In
Lee, Chang Hee
Jung, Dong Chae
Ryu, Dong Ryeol
On, Young Keun
Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
title Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
title_full Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
title_fullStr Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
title_full_unstemmed Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
title_short Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
title_sort electrical storms in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3017704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21155031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2011.52.1.26
work_keys_str_mv AT songpilsang electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT kimjunesoo electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT shindaehee electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT parkjungwae electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT baekiin electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT leechanghee electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT jungdongchae electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT ryudongryeol electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator
AT onyoungkeun electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator