Cargando…
Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
PURPOSE: In some patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), multiple episodes of electrical storm (ES) can occur. We assessed the prevalence, features, and predictors of ES in patients with ICD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-five patients with an ICD were analyzed. ES was defined...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Yonsei University College of Medicine
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3017704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21155031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2011.52.1.26 |
_version_ | 1782195937048788992 |
---|---|
author | Song, Pil Sang Kim, June Soo Shin, Dae-Hee Park, Jung Wae Bae, Ki In Lee, Chang Hee Jung, Dong Chae Ryu, Dong Ryeol On, Young Keun |
author_facet | Song, Pil Sang Kim, June Soo Shin, Dae-Hee Park, Jung Wae Bae, Ki In Lee, Chang Hee Jung, Dong Chae Ryu, Dong Ryeol On, Young Keun |
author_sort | Song, Pil Sang |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: In some patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), multiple episodes of electrical storm (ES) can occur. We assessed the prevalence, features, and predictors of ES in patients with ICD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-five patients with an ICD were analyzed. ES was defined as the occurrence of two or more ventricular tachyarrhythmias within 24 hours. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients experienced at least one ES episode, and 16 patients experienced two or more ES episodes. The first ES occurred 209 ± 277 days after ICD implantation. In most ES cases, the index arrhythmia was ventricular tachycardia (65%). There were no obvious etiologic factors at the onset of most ES episodes (57%). More patients with a structurally normal heart (p = 0.043) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the index arrhythmia (p = 0.017) were in the ES-free group. Kaplan-Meier estimates and a log-rank test showed that patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMP) (log-rank test, p = 0.016) or with left ventricular ejection fraction < 35% (p = 0.032) were more likely to experience ES, and that patients with VF (p = 0.047) were less affected by ES. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that nonischemic DCMP correlated with a greater probability of ES (hazard ratio, 3.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-11.85; p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: ES is a common and recurrent event in patients with an ICD. Nonischemic DCMP is an independent predictor of ES. Patients with VF or with a structurally normal heart are less likely to experience ES. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-3017704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Yonsei University College of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-30177042011-01-10 Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Song, Pil Sang Kim, June Soo Shin, Dae-Hee Park, Jung Wae Bae, Ki In Lee, Chang Hee Jung, Dong Chae Ryu, Dong Ryeol On, Young Keun Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: In some patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), multiple episodes of electrical storm (ES) can occur. We assessed the prevalence, features, and predictors of ES in patients with ICD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-five patients with an ICD were analyzed. ES was defined as the occurrence of two or more ventricular tachyarrhythmias within 24 hours. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients experienced at least one ES episode, and 16 patients experienced two or more ES episodes. The first ES occurred 209 ± 277 days after ICD implantation. In most ES cases, the index arrhythmia was ventricular tachycardia (65%). There were no obvious etiologic factors at the onset of most ES episodes (57%). More patients with a structurally normal heart (p = 0.043) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the index arrhythmia (p = 0.017) were in the ES-free group. Kaplan-Meier estimates and a log-rank test showed that patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMP) (log-rank test, p = 0.016) or with left ventricular ejection fraction < 35% (p = 0.032) were more likely to experience ES, and that patients with VF (p = 0.047) were less affected by ES. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that nonischemic DCMP correlated with a greater probability of ES (hazard ratio, 3.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-11.85; p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: ES is a common and recurrent event in patients with an ICD. Nonischemic DCMP is an independent predictor of ES. Patients with VF or with a structurally normal heart are less likely to experience ES. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2011-01-01 2010-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3017704/ /pubmed/21155031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2011.52.1.26 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2011 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Song, Pil Sang Kim, June Soo Shin, Dae-Hee Park, Jung Wae Bae, Ki In Lee, Chang Hee Jung, Dong Chae Ryu, Dong Ryeol On, Young Keun Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator |
title | Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator |
title_full | Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator |
title_fullStr | Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator |
title_full_unstemmed | Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator |
title_short | Electrical Storms in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator |
title_sort | electrical storms in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3017704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21155031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2011.52.1.26 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songpilsang electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT kimjunesoo electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT shindaehee electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT parkjungwae electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT baekiin electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT leechanghee electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT jungdongchae electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT ryudongryeol electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator AT onyoungkeun electricalstormsinpatientswithanimplantablecardioverterdefibrillator |