Cargando…

Metaplastic Breast Cancer: To Radiate or Not to Radiate?

BACKGROUND: The role of radiation therapy (RT) is unclear for metaplastic breast cancer (MBC). We hypothesized that RT would improve overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tseng, Warren H., Martinez, Steve R.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3018259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20585866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1198-6
_version_ 1782196041705062400
author Tseng, Warren H.
Martinez, Steve R.
author_facet Tseng, Warren H.
Martinez, Steve R.
author_sort Tseng, Warren H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The role of radiation therapy (RT) is unclear for metaplastic breast cancer (MBC). We hypothesized that RT would improve overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify MBC patients diagnosed from1988 to 2006. Univariate analyses of patient, tumor, and treatment-specific factors on OS and DSS were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and differences among survival curves assessed via log rank. Variables assessed included patient age, race/ethnicity, histologic subtype, tumor grade, T stage, N stage, M stage, hormone receptor status, surgery type, and use of RT. Cox proportional hazards models used all univariate covariates. Risks of mortality were reported as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI); significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Among 1501 patients, RT was given to 580 (38.6%). Ten-year OS and DSS were 53.2, and 68.3%, respectively. In the overall analysis, RT provided an OS (HR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51–0.82; P < 0.001) and DSS (HR 0.74; CI, 0.56–0.96; P < 0.03) benefit. When patients were stratified according to type of surgery, RT provided an OS but not a DSS benefit to lumpectomy (HR 0.51; CI, 0.32–0.79, P < 0.01) and mastectomy patients (HR 0.67; CI, 0.49–0.90; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the use of RT for patients with MBC following lumpectomy or mastectomy. These retrospective findings should be confirmed in a prospective clinical trial.
format Text
id pubmed-3018259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30182592011-02-04 Metaplastic Breast Cancer: To Radiate or Not to Radiate? Tseng, Warren H. Martinez, Steve R. Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: The role of radiation therapy (RT) is unclear for metaplastic breast cancer (MBC). We hypothesized that RT would improve overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify MBC patients diagnosed from1988 to 2006. Univariate analyses of patient, tumor, and treatment-specific factors on OS and DSS were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and differences among survival curves assessed via log rank. Variables assessed included patient age, race/ethnicity, histologic subtype, tumor grade, T stage, N stage, M stage, hormone receptor status, surgery type, and use of RT. Cox proportional hazards models used all univariate covariates. Risks of mortality were reported as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI); significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Among 1501 patients, RT was given to 580 (38.6%). Ten-year OS and DSS were 53.2, and 68.3%, respectively. In the overall analysis, RT provided an OS (HR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51–0.82; P < 0.001) and DSS (HR 0.74; CI, 0.56–0.96; P < 0.03) benefit. When patients were stratified according to type of surgery, RT provided an OS but not a DSS benefit to lumpectomy (HR 0.51; CI, 0.32–0.79, P < 0.01) and mastectomy patients (HR 0.67; CI, 0.49–0.90; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the use of RT for patients with MBC following lumpectomy or mastectomy. These retrospective findings should be confirmed in a prospective clinical trial. Springer-Verlag 2010-06-29 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3018259/ /pubmed/20585866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1198-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Breast Oncology
Tseng, Warren H.
Martinez, Steve R.
Metaplastic Breast Cancer: To Radiate or Not to Radiate?
title Metaplastic Breast Cancer: To Radiate or Not to Radiate?
title_full Metaplastic Breast Cancer: To Radiate or Not to Radiate?
title_fullStr Metaplastic Breast Cancer: To Radiate or Not to Radiate?
title_full_unstemmed Metaplastic Breast Cancer: To Radiate or Not to Radiate?
title_short Metaplastic Breast Cancer: To Radiate or Not to Radiate?
title_sort metaplastic breast cancer: to radiate or not to radiate?
topic Breast Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3018259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20585866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1198-6
work_keys_str_mv AT tsengwarrenh metaplasticbreastcancertoradiateornottoradiate
AT martinezstever metaplasticbreastcancertoradiateornottoradiate