Cargando…

Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task

Deviations in both haptic and visual spatial experiments are thought to be caused by a biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The strength of this influence is strongly participant-dependent. By using a parallelity test, it is studied whether this strength is modality-independent. In bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kappers, Astrid M. L., Schakel, Wouter B.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3018272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21132493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2500-3
_version_ 1782196044330696704
author Kappers, Astrid M. L.
Schakel, Wouter B.
author_facet Kappers, Astrid M. L.
Schakel, Wouter B.
author_sort Kappers, Astrid M. L.
collection PubMed
description Deviations in both haptic and visual spatial experiments are thought to be caused by a biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The strength of this influence is strongly participant-dependent. By using a parallelity test, it is studied whether this strength is modality-independent. In both haptic and visual conditions, large, systematic and participant-dependent deviations were found. However, although the correlation between the haptic and visual deviations was significant, the explained variance due to a common factor was only 20%. Therefore, the degree to which a participant is “egocentric” depends on modality and possibly even more generally, on experimental condition.
format Text
id pubmed-3018272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30182722011-02-04 Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task Kappers, Astrid M. L. Schakel, Wouter B. Exp Brain Res Research Note Deviations in both haptic and visual spatial experiments are thought to be caused by a biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The strength of this influence is strongly participant-dependent. By using a parallelity test, it is studied whether this strength is modality-independent. In both haptic and visual conditions, large, systematic and participant-dependent deviations were found. However, although the correlation between the haptic and visual deviations was significant, the explained variance due to a common factor was only 20%. Therefore, the degree to which a participant is “egocentric” depends on modality and possibly even more generally, on experimental condition. Springer-Verlag 2010-12-05 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3018272/ /pubmed/21132493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2500-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2010 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Note
Kappers, Astrid M. L.
Schakel, Wouter B.
Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task
title Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task
title_full Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task
title_fullStr Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task
title_short Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task
title_sort comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3018272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21132493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2500-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kappersastridml comparisonofthehapticandvisualdeviationsinaparallelitytask
AT schakelwouterb comparisonofthehapticandvisualdeviationsinaparallelitytask