Cargando…

Genome-wide SNPs and re-sequencing of growth habit and inflorescence genes in barley: implications for association mapping in germplasm arrays varying in size and structure

BACKGROUND: Considerations in applying association mapping (AM) to plant breeding are population structure and size: not accounting for structure and/or using small populations can lead to elevated false-positive rates. The principal determinants of population structure in cultivated barley are grow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuesta-Marcos, Alfonso, Szűcs, Péter, Close, Timothy J, Filichkin, Tanya, Muehlbauer, Gary J, Smith, Kevin P, Hayes, Patrick M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3018479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21159198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-707
_version_ 1782196077381812224
author Cuesta-Marcos, Alfonso
Szűcs, Péter
Close, Timothy J
Filichkin, Tanya
Muehlbauer, Gary J
Smith, Kevin P
Hayes, Patrick M
author_facet Cuesta-Marcos, Alfonso
Szűcs, Péter
Close, Timothy J
Filichkin, Tanya
Muehlbauer, Gary J
Smith, Kevin P
Hayes, Patrick M
author_sort Cuesta-Marcos, Alfonso
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Considerations in applying association mapping (AM) to plant breeding are population structure and size: not accounting for structure and/or using small populations can lead to elevated false-positive rates. The principal determinants of population structure in cultivated barley are growth habit and inflorescence type. Both are under complex genetic control: growth habit is controlled by the epistatic interactions of several genes. For inflorescence type, multiple loss-of-function alleles in one gene lead to the same phenotype. We used these two traits as models for assessing the effectiveness of AM. This research was initiated using the CAP Core germplasm array (n = 102) assembled at the start of the Barley Coordinated Agricultural Project (CAP). This array was genotyped with 4,608 SNPs and we re-sequenced genes involved in morphology, growth and development. Larger arrays of breeding germplasm were subsequently genotyped and phenotyped under the auspices of the CAP project. This provided sets of 247 accessions phenotyped for growth habit and 2,473 accessions phenotyped for inflorescence type. Each of the larger populations was genotyped with 3,072 SNPs derived from the original set of 4,608. RESULTS: Significant associations with SNPs located in the vicinity of the loci involved in growth habit and inflorescence type were found in the CAP Core. Differentiation of true and spurious associations was not possible without a priori knowledge of the candidate genes, based on re-sequencing. The re-sequencing data were used to define allele types of the determinant genes based on functional polymorphisms. In a second round of association mapping, these synthetic markers based on allele types gave the most significant associations. When the synthetic markers were used as anchor points for analysis of interactions, we detected other known-function genes and candidate loci involved in the control of growth habit and inflorescence type. We then conducted association analyses - with SNP data only - in the larger germplasm arrays. For both vernalization sensitivity and inflorescence type, the most significant associations in the larger data sets were found with SNPs coincident with the synthetic markers used in the CAP Core and with SNPs detected via interaction analysis in the CAP Core. CONCLUSIONS: Small and highly structured collections of germplasm, such as the CAP Core, are cost-effectively phenotyped and genotyped with high-throughput markers. They are also useful for characterizing allelic diversity at loci in germplasm of interest. Our results suggest that discovery-oriented exercises in AM in such small arrays may generate a large number of false-positives. However, if haplotypes in candidate genes are available, they may be used as anchors in an analysis of interactions to identify other candidate regions harboring genes determining target traits. Using larger germplasm arrays, genome regions where the principal genes determining vernalization sensitivity and row type are located were identified.
format Text
id pubmed-3018479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-30184792011-01-11 Genome-wide SNPs and re-sequencing of growth habit and inflorescence genes in barley: implications for association mapping in germplasm arrays varying in size and structure Cuesta-Marcos, Alfonso Szűcs, Péter Close, Timothy J Filichkin, Tanya Muehlbauer, Gary J Smith, Kevin P Hayes, Patrick M BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Considerations in applying association mapping (AM) to plant breeding are population structure and size: not accounting for structure and/or using small populations can lead to elevated false-positive rates. The principal determinants of population structure in cultivated barley are growth habit and inflorescence type. Both are under complex genetic control: growth habit is controlled by the epistatic interactions of several genes. For inflorescence type, multiple loss-of-function alleles in one gene lead to the same phenotype. We used these two traits as models for assessing the effectiveness of AM. This research was initiated using the CAP Core germplasm array (n = 102) assembled at the start of the Barley Coordinated Agricultural Project (CAP). This array was genotyped with 4,608 SNPs and we re-sequenced genes involved in morphology, growth and development. Larger arrays of breeding germplasm were subsequently genotyped and phenotyped under the auspices of the CAP project. This provided sets of 247 accessions phenotyped for growth habit and 2,473 accessions phenotyped for inflorescence type. Each of the larger populations was genotyped with 3,072 SNPs derived from the original set of 4,608. RESULTS: Significant associations with SNPs located in the vicinity of the loci involved in growth habit and inflorescence type were found in the CAP Core. Differentiation of true and spurious associations was not possible without a priori knowledge of the candidate genes, based on re-sequencing. The re-sequencing data were used to define allele types of the determinant genes based on functional polymorphisms. In a second round of association mapping, these synthetic markers based on allele types gave the most significant associations. When the synthetic markers were used as anchor points for analysis of interactions, we detected other known-function genes and candidate loci involved in the control of growth habit and inflorescence type. We then conducted association analyses - with SNP data only - in the larger germplasm arrays. For both vernalization sensitivity and inflorescence type, the most significant associations in the larger data sets were found with SNPs coincident with the synthetic markers used in the CAP Core and with SNPs detected via interaction analysis in the CAP Core. CONCLUSIONS: Small and highly structured collections of germplasm, such as the CAP Core, are cost-effectively phenotyped and genotyped with high-throughput markers. They are also useful for characterizing allelic diversity at loci in germplasm of interest. Our results suggest that discovery-oriented exercises in AM in such small arrays may generate a large number of false-positives. However, if haplotypes in candidate genes are available, they may be used as anchors in an analysis of interactions to identify other candidate regions harboring genes determining target traits. Using larger germplasm arrays, genome regions where the principal genes determining vernalization sensitivity and row type are located were identified. BioMed Central 2010-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3018479/ /pubmed/21159198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-707 Text en Copyright ©2010 Cuesta-Marcos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cuesta-Marcos, Alfonso
Szűcs, Péter
Close, Timothy J
Filichkin, Tanya
Muehlbauer, Gary J
Smith, Kevin P
Hayes, Patrick M
Genome-wide SNPs and re-sequencing of growth habit and inflorescence genes in barley: implications for association mapping in germplasm arrays varying in size and structure
title Genome-wide SNPs and re-sequencing of growth habit and inflorescence genes in barley: implications for association mapping in germplasm arrays varying in size and structure
title_full Genome-wide SNPs and re-sequencing of growth habit and inflorescence genes in barley: implications for association mapping in germplasm arrays varying in size and structure
title_fullStr Genome-wide SNPs and re-sequencing of growth habit and inflorescence genes in barley: implications for association mapping in germplasm arrays varying in size and structure
title_full_unstemmed Genome-wide SNPs and re-sequencing of growth habit and inflorescence genes in barley: implications for association mapping in germplasm arrays varying in size and structure
title_short Genome-wide SNPs and re-sequencing of growth habit and inflorescence genes in barley: implications for association mapping in germplasm arrays varying in size and structure
title_sort genome-wide snps and re-sequencing of growth habit and inflorescence genes in barley: implications for association mapping in germplasm arrays varying in size and structure
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3018479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21159198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-707
work_keys_str_mv AT cuestamarcosalfonso genomewidesnpsandresequencingofgrowthhabitandinflorescencegenesinbarleyimplicationsforassociationmappingingermplasmarraysvaryinginsizeandstructure
AT szucspeter genomewidesnpsandresequencingofgrowthhabitandinflorescencegenesinbarleyimplicationsforassociationmappingingermplasmarraysvaryinginsizeandstructure
AT closetimothyj genomewidesnpsandresequencingofgrowthhabitandinflorescencegenesinbarleyimplicationsforassociationmappingingermplasmarraysvaryinginsizeandstructure
AT filichkintanya genomewidesnpsandresequencingofgrowthhabitandinflorescencegenesinbarleyimplicationsforassociationmappingingermplasmarraysvaryinginsizeandstructure
AT muehlbauergaryj genomewidesnpsandresequencingofgrowthhabitandinflorescencegenesinbarleyimplicationsforassociationmappingingermplasmarraysvaryinginsizeandstructure
AT smithkevinp genomewidesnpsandresequencingofgrowthhabitandinflorescencegenesinbarleyimplicationsforassociationmappingingermplasmarraysvaryinginsizeandstructure
AT hayespatrickm genomewidesnpsandresequencingofgrowthhabitandinflorescencegenesinbarleyimplicationsforassociationmappingingermplasmarraysvaryinginsizeandstructure